Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Globalfox

Member
  • Posts

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Globalfox

  1. 485000 a week and yes I do blame the players they are a disgrace and that includes all of them.
  2. The Mclintock episodes was really bad but this current lot may just be edging even that out. This team is spineless, gutless, unfit, over paid, badly led, the whole coaching staff, medical staff, operations staff, are shit. We need a three year recovery in the championship and everyone here at the moment needs to go and be replaced with new blood. And when I say everyone I mean everyone.
  3. Incorrect Top owns more than 75% of the shares in Leicester City Football Club, I suspect he owns 100%. King Power owns nothing in Leicester City Football Club. Other than as a sponsor they have no fiscal risk in the club. What happens at King Pwer has no direct influence on the club. If it stops supplying money to Top as an individual then his ability to spend becomes a problem. As regards financial lines of credit with Macquarie bank they can only be spent on Leicester City Football Club business unless Top makes a loan to KP and records it. Complete irrelevance this topic.
  4. So the individuals who signed the NDA share nothing with other members of the Trust Board is that correct? If they don’t then the Trust is not engaged. If they do those people are not subject to the NDA so can share with Trust Members and the wider fa base?
  5. It does appear to be the case that Top is more immersed in the religion. The lawsuit I would imagine is an automatic given by any large corporation. I shave and continue to be involved in many ‘incident’ driven legal cases and I would have been more shocked if there was not an attempt at compensation. I believe that with the Football Club his personal attributes may be playing a heavier presence.
  6. Do we have a deeper problem here driven by Tops religious beliefs. I recall his time out to become a Buddhist monk. Studying the beliefs of that particular religion would appear to pervade what many of us see as lack of firm control and direction. Does his view of the world preclude making tough business decisions, relieving poor performers of their positions, getting angry at being ripped off. Is he viewing the world through rose colored glasses. Not knocking his beliefs just challenging are they behind what many of us perceive as inaction. Thinking it through it would explain a lot and if so becomes truly worrying as it means nothing will change.
  7. A bigger question is has anyone actually signed an NDA or is it just implicit because it was in the invitation posting. What exactly does the NDA restrict. Mr Bason as I understand it cannot be representing the Foxes Trust on the FAB as he is not an elected official of the Trust and therefore cannot speak on our behalf. When do the Trust Officers actually consult the Trust Membership on what the opinion of the Trust members is on given topics. If they do I as a member never see it. Can any officer legally commit the trust to an NDA was this discussed and agreed by all Board Members? The issue is the Trust acts in a vacuum it seems from its members.
  8. Project reset all of them except Hermansen, Bilal and if he maintains yesterday Coulibally
  9. So two differing topics are being mixed here dialogue with the club is one thing and yes it’s critical for the trust. Opposite to that is the Trust Board claiming to represent views of members when there is little to no engagement plus receiving information that they will not share with the members they represent. You can engage with the club but make it clear that as representatives of the trust they cannot agree to an NDA. I doubt the terms of the NDA were ever negotiated. Also was any document signed that outlines the terms and topics of the NDA. It’s OK for an individual but the board in effect committed the Trust to restrictions without asking the membership. The Everton Trust took a different path and communicate with their members but the club at least according to recent reports ignores the. That’s choice we were never offered it.
  10. The real question is are the Trust Leaders forgetting who they are responsible to and that is the membership not the Football Club. I feel aggrieved that two members of the Trust who have no more importance than me are provided insights that they then keep from me. In fact information is the property of the trust and all its members. This is the key point of why they should have said they cannot agree to the confidentiality clauses of the FAB. They never asked the Trust membership if the members agreed to be muted as an organization. I have spoken to solicitors because as a member I feel that this breaks the basis of a a community benefit society and that two leadership individuals are not acting in the best interests of the members of the community benefit society. Either share or withdraw from the FAB as a member I and many others were never asked if we approve of this secret society under the guise of representing the trust members.
  11. RVN is no good as a coach his whole demeanor exudes apathy and failure. His tactical decisions cost us time and again. What truly scares me is being in the Championship and having him in charge I have zero confidence in him even if he had better players to work with. He is a dabbler full of himself and not the events happening on the pitch I cannot see another win under him the spurs was a fluke given how bad they were. Coaches are supposed to improve players and teams we have gotten marginally worse under his tenure. Let’s see what he does next based on today Coulibally earnt a start will he. Reid did absolutely nothing again so why play him. 75 minutes team did well but taking Wild off was a joke yes recently back but he was the heart and van nistleroy ripped it out. Amateur coach trading on past name.
  12. Interesting question and my observations are that none of the current squad is ‘fighting’ for us. An occasional flash from Vardy. We see Ayew hugging opposition players on the touchline, RVN hugging McGuire at the end of the game. The only thing modern players fight for is their agents milking the game. There is very little association with the club and supporters at the Premier League level. Last night was fun to watch a throwback to the really enjoyable days of football. But they are sadly gone sanitized in a world of corporate good behavior. Sad but true the best days are behind us.
  13. I do not think anyone is suggesting a team full of young professionals but testing some given the complete ineptitude of some of our seniors. I said close season that Ben Nelson was ready based on what we saw last season but no a loan Alves is another that is being left too long to see if he really has what it takes. Monga is possibly too young but who knows. If they are not blooded by 19-20 it’s probably too late. Golding is another who since we spent money should be pushed harder. Experience has failed clearly we cannot do worse and just maybe we find a diamond.
  14. Remember it’s not a football club up for sale it’s a franchise. The average MlS franchise is valued at 720 million. Buying Whitecaps could then be moved to a major US city without a franchise hence increasing the value. On that basis e00 million is a cheap price.
  15. Just not good enough we would have been better off playing with ten men.
  16. PGMOL corruption at work again even Specsavers would not use this as an advert.
  17. Totally done with him hugging McGuire on the pitch after his offside goal just knocked us out. No respect for us as supporters or the club that pays his wages. That on top of his nonsense and complete lack of tactical ability. Leave him in Manchester.
  18. I was here before KP, before Mandaric, before Shipman have watched crap, watched average ridden the highs and the lows. If you think it’s low right now you have not been around long enough. Will I have a season ticket next year almost certainly yes. I did not want to go up this season and it’s been proven correct. I don’t mind the championship so much easier to get tickets, some nice trips. Will miss some grounds but not others. Every supporter attends for different reasons mine will not change.
  19. I expected relegation this season my hope was not to get battered regularly. I did not like cooper and I hoped for RVN. The fact is that I was wrong we were better under cooper. Who knows the truth but it is clear that RVN has marginalized better performing players such as Buanonotto and Okoli. I dislike Choudray but given performances he should have been given a chance given the lack of workrate and tenacity of winks, skipp and Soumare. I see no tactical or coaching capability from RVN. I see no drive from RVN. Him managing in the championship would be a joke.
  20. Just to be pedantic but if the board is sacked as requested Rudkin remains as he is not on the board. In fact the only individual on the board who could be sacked per se is Susan Whelan the rest are Tops Brother and their Chinese friend. So the campaign is to remove the owners if you want to sack the board. Your campaign therefore is really Sack the Owners. Grammatically that is incorrect so the demonstration you want is Top Out. More succinct and more aligned with the true aims. Or is it we want more and additional experienced football staff added to the board? Not such a zingy ring to it. If being charged per letter Top Out will be cheaper to print. Not for or against just saying.
  21. Been saying this since we signed him, also move Faes into midfield bring in Okoli alongside Coady. Play Daka up front, Buonanotto alongside. We cannot be any worse.
  22. Just talking to a member of the Spurs coaching staff his comment ‘wow that makes life easier’. You cannot make this up but it may work BDCR is so bad they probably have no plan for that.
  23. Makes it look like any potential buyer will have to dig deeper circa 450 million now. Prepares us for the upcoming change of rules. Will help liquidity. Two fingers up to anyone who says he has lost interest.
  24. Incorrect point 6 of the ground regulations makes it clear that you agree to any search and failure to comply is reason for rejection of entry and is a standard clause at all football grounds in the EPL. They do not require cause as long as they do not select you based on a discriminatory basis. They are not breaking the law they are complying with the ground regulations you agreed to when you purchased a ticket. There are many more important failings in the match-day experience that we should focus on.
  25. Done but it’s another piss poor set of questions designed to support a story that is probably already written. Too short, too little expansion on themes. The art of true journalism is dead.
×
×
  • Create New...