Zear0

Who's starting the L1 26/27 thread?

Please be good

Continue to supply weapons to Ukraine in exchange for their rare earths. The pacifist speaks.

Yeah, sugar coated bacon will suffice in the interim.

Oh dear.

This administration and yellow peril? Noooo

Not sure identifying the root cause of COVID is pointless.

You ok?

Still play her over Daka

Mars Attacks

Such a broad church at the low end. Flimsy can be mitigated against, the tracing paper grade stuff can whistle.

Nothing makes Gatwick cool.

Comes out the tap

I know, it's just bonkers all around.

I honestly don't know wtf ATC were doing (assuming pilots were doing as trained). They direct aircraft flight levels to prevent this exact thing from happening. Having said, the thought of a Blackhawk pilot being a cowboy isn't exactly a stretch for the imagination.

Speaking as someone who nearly landed a plane on another plane quite recently, visibility for things above/below in aircraft is absolutely dreadful. You rely so much on ATC to just ensure you're not put in that position.

Baby when you're gone

All the best sir. We're here for any vents or things you need to get off your chest and hope you come out the better for it shortly.

RFK Jr. hearing is hilarious. Utter utter chaos.

My mistake. It even appears as a front page ad when I launched the O.G.

P*ss up in a brewery springs to mind.

No it isn't. There are risks in everything you do in life. Designers, regulators and operators contribute to the safety case to ensure all risks are adequately mitigated against, not eliminated.

Been out for a while as I've been playing it recently! Such a class game. https://www.cdkeys.com/stronghold-definitive-edition-pc-steam Take a punt for £6

It's an argument for all crimes though. Why is 12 jurors acceptable for a conviction (unanimous, not unanimous), why not 1 or 1,000? It seems almost circumstantial to the situation in where the crime took place that should dictate our confidence in any conviction. If someone walks into the centre of the KP and boots someone in the Jaffers (Rudkin ideally), you'd be more confident in convicting them than for something that happens behind closed doors when it's one person's word against another (exemplified by the appalling low rape conviction rates). Forget what it was called, but Channel 4 replicated a murder case and the jurors on the show returned a different verdict than that of the actual trial. Makes potential uses of AI all the more nefarious.