st albans fox

Wilf is not an advanced midfielder up the middle of the pitch he can play widish 8 (as we saw last year)

That occurs to me but then a don’t believe they play as a three because surely buenonotte starts ??

Nah - cooper’s brother doesn’t have a stud in his right ear

What’s the point in having a squad and not selecting it v tranmere ? Harry and wilf should not be playing each game is sapping away any positivity I want to give to the coach …..

Yes but not till next season in the championship this season the Wolfsburg left wing back will play in goal

Possible but raya is going to be no 1 so mads would have to accept he won’t play also, age is less relevant with keepers

Clearly no one on twitter actually knows any actual detail

can you imagine ......................... yeah, i suppose we can

makes no difference - he's on loan this season and i reckon they'd see him as a no 2 to begin with

In a year he has one year left so we need obligation to buy ……

I’ve heard that there is a disagreement over the luncheon vouchers and green shield stamps …..

Strange though there have been no connections between us and them for two weeks now

He won’t raise taxes where he said he wouldn’t - income tax, vat, NI they didn’t actually commit to not raising any others. most sane objective people knew that they would have to increase taxes somewhere

Misinterpreting again - sorry You’re right - he doesn’t identify them. I’m sure he could refuse to proceed on any particular player if he had large misgivings. fwiw, most on here were quite happy with daka and Bertrand seemed a no brainier for £4m per season for two years. The damage done to him by covid could not have been foreseen.

Good point this hasnt just happened must have been an approach from somewhere then who wouldn’t meet our price - spurs ???

Getting deals done more quickly could have delivered a point at Fulham and possibly another one against villa. I know that the system is more complex than that and we’ve missed out on targets but there are questions about their viability and our naivety in pursuing them

The one I quoted you on replied to a post which didn’t do that - hence confusion on that particular point. See below

I hope they don’t stumble across our target ……

so that’s 21+6 and 10% sell on or 20+6 from two sources we offered 20+3+10% sell on according to one of those assume we’ll settle on something in the add ons to get it done (Chelsea just bought their keeper for €20m and loaned him back to them so they’ve taken some money in this week)

By which point we’ve made it a 35 game season for us.

Not one where we’ll get any points …….

So it’s his fault then it wasn’t a secret within the industry that a certain HOR had sticky fingers and wasn’t for for purpose on that basis alone.

This doesn’t address actual ground invasion of Russian territory or heavy targeting of Russian assets inside the country. Whilst the latter would be difficult to justify use of a TNW unless it was really large, the former is much easier to frame as such (irrespective of the small area entered). I don’t feel that the Russians arguing that believing that their territorial or sovereign integrity is under threat justifies use of a TNW is unreasonable. of course the actual level of belief is questionable

Already several correct answers but the genie is out of the bottle and it’s not a single silver bullet responsible I have direct experience of this with some of my kids - Fortunately not chronic (at this stage) and addressing it is important. However, I don’t believe that social media has any responsibility in these cases.

Who made that decision ?