st albans fox

That concerned me he was actually holding onto Duran when the cross came in - either challenge or make sure he can’t get any power on the header

On our ‘goal’ the ball deflected into the path of our runner when it wasn’t headed for him before the deflection. Late in the game the touch off the ref had no material effect on the movement of the ball to our player - so he played on

So the ref thinks vardy touches the ball he maybe gives a pen the var would over rule cos it just wasn’t. the only way that could be a pen is if tielemans clears the ball and goes through the man recklessly. But he didn’t so it wasn’t. the throw in should have been ours - thats all - and we wasted the time we had left to equalise by arguing about it for 45 seconds

It shouldn’t have been a villa throw vardy never touched the ball

I just think that when you lose possession and then chase back and challenge from behind you’re nearly always going to give away a foul unless you take it cleanly and don’t touch the player with your other foot.

But he volleyed the ball clear before they contacted - I doubt MOTD will even show it later

He didn’t

He cleared it and then the two of them came together - how is that a foul ? Tackle from behind is usually given as a foul, even if you do manage to get to the ball

Don’t like the manager moaning and complaining about 50/50 calls it transmits onto the players who then waste two minutes of added time arguing over a wrongly given throw in we moan about the wrong calls - there were 50/50 throw ins that we just didn’t bother to ask for so didn’t get

They were gash but miles ahead of us at wasting time wonder how many mins the ball was actually in play second half

Tbf to Coote, he has showed a better first touch today than wilf ….

Plenty of the ball and no one to do anything with it Emery proving his worth by changing it for them

We probably had offers of £19m but rudders spreadsheet said we couldnt accept less than 19,000.001

God that’s U10’s stuff

His salary is £4m no one is covering that no one is covering half of that.

Does anyone know if the player made a call that he would rather stay and fight for a place than go out on loan ??

No way - those two are banker no lose games !

Probably best mowing the lawn ….

Arsenal fans are so entitled - and they’ve won two fa cups in the past ten years

We have no idea about what we got from Sevilla for his loan - could have been gash he went on deadline day when there were still options out there but he wanted to go to Seville now there is only one game in town - turkey its possible we already have ‘a Turkish deal’ sorted but are waiting till our window is shut cos it doesn’t need doing urgently. If that’s the case then cooper won’t pick him

Could see in the week that Ricky needs game time to get into rhythm

Whilst were trying to move him on I doubt we’ll dump him outside the squad - not a good look when you’re trying to squeeze a few quid out of a buyer (as in a loan - we won’t actually sell him)

Food definitely won’t be kosher ………..

For psr yes but for asset value of the club no. One of main reasons why Chelsea are doing long deals is to keep the asset value of the club as high as possible. amortisation much lower than it would be if all deals were five years. So if Clearlake want to sell, the books look better.

Hopefully but that still means in a years time we have a player who doesn’t want to be here on 80k/week with one year left on his contract. the most we will get from Turkey is 40k/week that leaves us paying 2m this season on his wages plus 3.5m amortised value. So he’s not here and he’s costing us 5.5m on psr. That the psr equivalent of a player just signed for 12m on 60k per week. id be pretty sure that we turned down a better scenario than this from France or Italy in the last couple months.