Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

st albans fox

Member
  • Posts

    42,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by st albans fox

  1. Which then makes sense to keep the bc game charade …..
  2. Will bc game be able to sponsor us next season in the championship or are new rules coming in ?
  3. Solid start for England chasing under 200 v India
  4. Seems that the family/king power/someone is prepared to put money into the club via the dodgy sponsor despite the yuk nature of the sponsor, that’s a positive sign
  5. You’re not keeping their location a secret it’s not China!
  6. Yep i got v bored telling a lot of people that it wasn’t confirmed
  7. Wasn’t on my 2026 bingo card …..
  8. Also some chat that Mexican authorities don’t want victory celebrations in the late evening last game three died in those
  9. That’s not the law The player that ‘heads’ the ball - according to snicko, wasn’t in an offside position when the cross came in. Neither was the guy on the back post. the player that receives the ball can only be offside if the ball is touched by the head - otherwise it’s not played to him by the header but by the original cross them deflected off the head of the defender
  10. If you can’t accept the refs are honest then there’s no point in watching the tournament
  11. fingers crossed he could melt ! Trump is expected to speak outside at a 4 July celebration on Saturday, despite the predicted high temperatures; the president has maintained he wants to gather outside for the celebration. By the way, on July 4th, it's going to be approximately 107 degrees out, and I'm gonna go and I'm gonna make a really long speech just to show that I can do anything," he said.
  12. The agent won’t allow that - the player decides where he wants to go and there’s a ceiling on what that club will pay because the other club are effectively removed from the scene.
  13. Seeing saka playing in his position wouldn’t have helped 😄
  14. Going to be roasting in Philadelphia on Saturday will a slower tempo make any difference?
  15. This is relevant they must have decided that the push wasn’t sufficient for him to fall. given the high bar that’s been mostly applied, I’m not surprised the var didn’t recommend a review.
  16. The law involved is from the early seventies and even if we could deport him, I believe Pakistan wouldn’t take him I’d suggest the best option is to keep him incarcerated until we can work out if the law can be changed without unintended consequences. He hasn’t served his full sentence yet.
  17. The Israelis are the benchmark when it comes to efficiency and cost on desalination I saw a tv program on their systems last year - seriously impressive (Saudis have larger systems but are less concerned about efficiency for obvious reasons ) the trend of the last decade of glass completely full or empty on rainfall does lead you to ask what we’re going to do about agriculture down the entire eastern side of the country. We can’t just ignore the problem
  18. Disagree thats not a var overturn just as Kane’s wasn’t to give a pen in both situations is re refereeing and that’s not what var is for in the bbc studio there was no agreement on Kane pen - so no clear error in the 2 person poll in our household this morning both of us thought youri wasn’t a pen - so again no clear error var is not there to get the right decision. It’s there to correct clear and obvious mistakes I can appreciate that the var had some reason to closely check the Belgium call because the ref may not have seen it. Obvs he saw the Kane one and was of the opinion that he went over the challenge. so for var to be involved in Kane’s incident would definitely be re refereeing.
  19. I’d take rice off Anderson looks more capable of covering the ground than rice
  20. Both hydration breaks after England winger fails to control a pass we came into this tournament with low expectations and that’s proved correct Even Brazil would embarrass us
  21. I’m not checking back to see if anyone mentioned it but the full back pushing madueke in the face is a foul based on what we’ve seen in this tournament VAR ruled out a Congo goal for that very offence btw, I don’t think it’s a foul
  22. If the keeper doesn’t touch him, would he have ended up on the floor ? he was already falling so the answer is yes he didn’t need to fall like that - he could have taken the contact more upright
×
×
  • Create New...