st albans fox

has this been posted about schwartzer ? https://www.facebook.com/100069688519168/posts/pfbid0kgZr8KxoYHkchTEhGi5zS89mLJyN4f17D7dnNJHNrVZVBFKSyS8BNe6zm6So1cycl/?

once the accounts are in the public domain, everyone can see them. It might seem a bit crazy but It’s possible that someone will notice something that the authorities haven’t? We want to delay things as long as possible. I can’t see any benefit in filing the accounts at CH before the date they have to be filed.

Revenue streams from fanbase and sponsorship must be fairly similar ???.

Should I be doing some scouting in the national league south when I go to watch my local team ?

I don’t know the detail of this but assume that the international revenue is distributed on a sliding scale with those finishing higher up receiving a bigger proportion rather than just the rich six having a bigger lump than the other 14 ? I can appreciate why we thought that was in our interest as we sought to drive the gap between us and other similar sized clubs (eg palace) even wider

Top (and his father) attended way more games than would have been the case if they weren’t in love with the club we can’t know what their motivations really were at the outset but clearly they care(d) immensely

You make reasonable points which should have led to systems being put in place such that the vessel being off course to this degree would have delivered alarms for those who may be on the bridge and signed warnings for those about to enter onto the bridge ?? Would this have been prohibitively expensive? I wonder how the insurance liability stacks up against the operator of the bridge for those who have sadly perished

It’s a business though - if they have income which services the debt then it’s normal smaller clubs have less income so cannot carry as much debt

True but elf and safety …. If cargo ships of that size are using the waterway then the bridge needs to be judged based on what could happen ???

This is a huge problem but then would we object to the current system when we are just as likely to be taking kids from smaller clubs as the rich six are from us ??

🎶 you’ll never sing that 🎶

It’s not peanuts in the champions league ??

I’m no engineer but I’d have thought this doesn’t look like the best design whereby the whole bridge collapses when one support struck ??.

Not bad but perhaps a little too soon …… Anyway, for more information see below (I assume the mcallister family ‘bought’ the tugboats for the city ?) some worrying reports that maybe dozens have fallen into the river

A good read

That’s not certain Bert some have said that the efl embargo would remain unless they cancel it and would apply in the PL until it got sorted between us the P,L amd EFL in practice we would probably be allowed to spend within agreed limits to avoid the credibility of the PL being brought into question In any case, abdul would be allowed to sign due to legal obligations

Clever - we both have the same brief so request additional time to consider our options as he’s also busy Tuesdays aswell ….

the resolution calls for the immediate release of the hostages and ceasefire for the for the remainder of Ramadan this is weaker than the ceasefire arrangement that Hamas/ israel recently rejected. Hamas wouldn’t accept it because Israel wouldn’t withdraw their troops and agree to permanent ceasefire the bluster from Israel seems to be more to do with the fact that the us hasn’t vetoed than the actual content of the resolution. After all, if Israel receives all the hostages back and in return has to restrain from any fighting until the end of Ramadan then that’s a way better scenario than theyve been negotiating thus far. The resolution makes no mention of releasing convicted Palestinian prisoners on a scale 10:1 to a hostage which has been under discussion. this resolution actually backs netenyahu into a corner - suspect that’s what he’s mad about

I’ve heard that we’re getting though this with a sale of our future media rights to the planet zog from 2035-2045 via a company up north called interstellar …… Sounds a bit dodgy but apparently rudders is working off something that he arranged a decade ago ….

It’s not cash in the bank but if the deal is signed and done pre 30/6 then the total income less amounts owed can be included in the positive column presumably there are questions as to whether despite the deal being agreed, was it signed by all parties in time. My guess is that if it was agreed in time then a commission would accept that as mitigation ref the size of the breach.

Kevin day asks if we would have voted for ffp when it was brought in and he says yes we would have

We wouldn’t be able to include any add ons for nyoni in accounts I doubt we’ll get much more than £2m as an initial fee the football world knows about our predicament (just as is the case with Chelsea and others). Hence Brighton’s low ball jan offer for kdh we didn’t want to submit our accounts to efl pre march 1st cos we didn’t want proceedings started early enough to be concluded this season with appeals etc which would risk our promotion with a PL penalty applied in the efl (which is feasible)

I’m guessing that with Maddison in 22/23 we have a minor breach I’m also guessing that this also means with a big sale in June 24 we again have a minor breach these on rolling three year numbers

Just listened to Maguire’s podcast and he has us completely the wrong way around ffp - we didn’t vote for it (he agrees that we did) international re distribution of monies to rich six - we did vote for it (he states this is what’s changed since ffp was voted for)

Yes but if it’s a rolling three year period it’s moot if it matters having money pre June 30 2023 does matter for the rolling period ending June 30 2023