Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Ian Nacho

Member
  • Posts

    8,524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Ian Nacho

  1. Popov seems to be nowhere near the squad anymore.
  2. May as well of kept Cannon. Not saying he would've lit up the world but can't have been any worse than this bloke. Plus he is actually our player too that we can develop to get some sort of fee in the future for.
  3. Interesting to see if the article gets updated and if that is correct about KDH.
  4. Leicester at risk of another Premier League PSR charge over latest accounts Club recorded big losses over previous two years League sources say Leicester may have case to answer. Leicester face a nervous wait to discover whether they will be charged by the Premier League with breaching profitability and sustainability rules (PSR) for a second successive season. The club are one of several in the top flight who had to submit their financial accounts for the 2023-24 season by 5pm on New Year’s Eve, because they have recorded losses over the past two years, and will be told by 13 January whether they have breached PSR. Leicester escaped a Premier League points deduction earlier this season after they were charged with a £24.4m breach for the 2022-23 season. The club’s legal team successfully persuaded an independent commission that, having been relegated at the end of that season, Leicester were not in the Premier League when they submitted their accounts for that period on 30 June 2023 The club recorded pre-tax losses of £92.5m and £90m for the 2022 and 2023 financial years respectively, however, so are at risk of being charged with another breach. Given the points deductions handed out to Everton and Nottingham Forest last season, any charge could be a severe blow to Leicester’s survival hopes, with Ruud van Nistelrooy’s side second-bottom at the halfway point. Premier League rules restrict clubs to losses of £105m over a three-year period if all those years were spent in the top flight. Because Leicester were in the Championship last season their permitted losses for the current three-year cycle will be reduced by £22m, owing to the English Football League’s stricter spending limits. The club’s losses will have been reduced by last season’s player sales, with Harvey Barnes’s £38m move to Newcastle and Timothy Castagne’s £15m transfer to Fulham to be included in their latest accounts, along with the £10m compensation received from Enzo Maresca’s move to Chelsea. The £30m sale of Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall to Chelsea will not be included because that did not go through until July 2024. Leicester have expressed confidence they will avoid another charge, but Premier League sources feel the club may have a case to answer. As previously reported by the Guardian Leicester could face charges from the EFL for overspending during the 2020-23 period at the end of this season if they are relegated. Under regulations introduced 18 months ago, designed to ensure that any PSR breaches are dealt with swiftly, all Premier League clubs that have posted aggregate losses over the previous two accounting periods must hand in their accounts for the previous season by 31 December. Premier League lawyers and accountants will spend the next fortnight assessing the numbers to determine whether there have been any PSR breaches, with any decision to charge published by 13 January. Given Leicester were found to be in breach by £24.4m for the 2022-23 season they are the club most vulnerable to charges. Chelsea, Everton and Forest sold players last summer so are confident of complying with PSR. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/jan/01/leicester-at-risk-of-another-premier-league-psr-charge-over-latest-accounts?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
  5. Always thought he looked alright to me.
  6. I think he'll still have a part to play here.
  7. Big difference selling Vs loaning.
  8. Surely it must have been bad?
  9. Not convinced. Why would Brighton want to get rid if he's any good?
  10. Our track record with these types of signings is appalling.
  11. 16th Jan.
  12. If we had anything about us we'd have some signings already done with the registration pending. No doubt we haven't done that.
  13. Needs to get some more minutes. Mavadidi is starting to wind me up with his step overs with no output.
  14. The last two games really highlighted big team bias for me whether it's conscious or not. It's those 50/50 decisions that almost always go in the favour of the bigger team.
  15. What's VAR doing here?
  16. I would have brought him on 10-15 minutes earlier.
  17. Mustard. Can't see him being here next season regardless of what division we are in unfortunately.
  18. Had a go but ultimately not good enough to punish them.
  19. We're just lacking that bit of quality. Bilal is running the show.
  20. Be interesting to see what happens if there's a goal. They clearly haven't got a clue.
  21. He grew up being a Forest fan so it's no surprise he hasn't ever had anything positive to say about us.
  22. A couple of rows in front of me there's a group of about 5 Man City fans openly with their scarves on in the home end... Why on earth are they allowed in?
  23. Getting a puncture this morning was pretty annoying. Only local place who had availability for tomorrow was Kwik Fit and the only tyres they have available are £120+. Convenient...
  24. Starred tonight. Can't see it.
  25. They need to sort the communication out in the ground for VAR. Have absolutely no idea what is going on.
×
×
  • Create New...