HankMarvin

No rush lads

Look sluggish make some subs

Our strengths definitely lye on the front foot

Goat, people are so fickle though daka few goals against shit teams was the best thing since sliced bread

Had the best goals to minute ratio before before the Sunderland game , 3 since best choice

Could be in a time warp, like watching a BR performance but against shittier opposition

3 points or 4 points out of 15, still wank at this stage.

🤔

50 African wonder kids?

Renting it out on Fridays as a place of worship recoup some losses

Wasn’t Maddison on this years accounts? Net for 22/23 transfers was +32m

“Looking at the most recent accounts from the 2021/22, on the face of it Leicester City have the most to fear, because they had by far the largest operating loss of £83m, the highest wage bill of £182m, the highest wages to turnover ratio of 85%, the highest debt of £346m and the highest interest payable of £19m” Turnover will be expected to be 178m if you correlate the broadcasting losses -35m for European football/finishing bottom 3 in line with Southampton and Leeds even with the reduction in salary and bonuses as you state above the wages to turnover ratio will stay high because of the loss of broadcasting turnover. what about the rise in interest rates?

Chelsea to buy a Newcastle youngster n the next 6 months 🤔

After we sold Wesley Fofana, chief executive Susan Whelan. reassured “As we look to continue to compete with more established opponents, profits from player trading and continued successful recruitment will continue to feature prominently in our strategy,”

Not every contract has a 50% wage reduction. Percy stated between 35-50% Maguire said that the club’s revenue is likely to drop by around two-thirds – £70-80m, as opposed to £214m. the wage bill was 180m, 7 players out of contract plus player sales But additional players brought in.

Not quite everything you need to know

More how those players individually performed rather than the financial burden they carried, those clubs you mention have average attendances of 74k and 60k and have spent years around the upper echelons of the league so have/had much more quality at their disposal to mean that flops can be written off, the strength in depth in 16/17 meant that wasn’t the case for us.

Tbf the awful signings probably made more of an impact on progressing in the following years, than being “kept in our place”

So generally speaking higher paid players that end up in the prem or top leagues in Europe are not suitable for this level? “most of the players that are on high salaries were bought to play against PL teams, not EFL teams” So if money was no object would the championship managers be choosing championship players or premier league players 🤔

They brought in 66m worth of players and sold 30m of players

Wait a few years and you might see Leicester Athletic phoenix club

Probably the latter

Sold a considerable amount of players in the summer 187m although some with sell on fees included. Leeds on the other had -3m net in the championship with regards to transfers, which doesn’t seem likely to offset the relegation loss of revenues

That’s just it, we did take a punt given what the club would’ve know about the 2 previous years accounts. Faes in the summer of that season plus 31m in January.

It’s to stop clubs living beyond their means and ultimately ending up on the scrap heap league one and beyond in administration like Leeds, Wigan, Portsmouth, Coventry, Derby and Southampton in the last 15 years. its meant to be a sustainable approach where the finances improve year on year and spending increases, as opposed to a shit or bust scenario. Unfortunately it doesn’t factor in unexpected relegation when you have had two 5th place finishes and European football in the previous 4 years, just on paper we had the 7th highest wage bill in the prem at the time of relegation and the year on year losses.