HankMarvin

At the Commission hearing, the Prem had argued that Leicester should be deducted 12 points or fined £20m, but the panel ruled the club’s improving financial position was a mitigating factor

Will he be about the 7th manager to try and get a tune out of Daka. Sods Law that he gets a few goals gets a new contract and goes shit gain

Ferguson used to get rid of players that had won the league because things got stale, we have over paid players that have had multiple relegations, falls outs and been banished, then called on again. Is it any wonder the dressing room is of a toxic nature, and the performances match. There are many examples that have come to the surface, like Jannick and his dog, Winks and his sign. Imagine the stuff that goes on behind the scenes for these bunch of wet wipes. I hope Rowett is more old school and takes no prisoners

Rafa about to get sacked, do they want to wait for the original fat Spanish waiter

What’s that got that to do with getting turned down by Blackburn

Check the IP could be Faes sitting in a hotel room dressed in his aunts knickers and make up getting his own back

Well he wasn’t as he didn’t want to commit to the latter and there is nothing to suggest he applied for the Watford job

If he turned down Blackburn for a temporary gig there must be a big carrot

Hate to tell you but we are nearer league one than the premier league, it’s like saying Parker would be no good. It’s kinda irrelevant how they have failed in the top flight because we are miles away from that level

1.20 per game with a crappy Oxford team that were in league one a couple of seasons ago, I guess the expectation is he does better with players like Fatawu that are worth nearly as much as the squad he managed

What makes it even worse is they had a ready made manager before appointing Cifuntes,

Took 7 in our last 10 games

So if it was a different overhead, and the wage bill and previous overheads were then reduced, why would it be any different to the previous debt that has been wiped/converted to shares by the chairmen

The SCMP requirement is whereby a Club’s Player-Related Expenditure shall not exceed the sum of 60% or 50% of the Club’s Relevant Turnover. The shit will really hit the fan

Wages and salaries, went from £205m to £107m, factor in what ever players left and there is still a significant reduction which points the correct story. Conversely we will see in April, if they had increases that put it back up significantly when promoted.

Says he is helping out, but probably delaying the management decision being made. Made it clear he doesn’t want the role so should step down to force the hand instead of being used as a friendly scapegoat

Was just rumoured to be on £3.9m a season, even a 50% cut would put him out of our reach

It comes to a point now, where you would envisage these managers are sort of hoping and angling for the sack when things get tough. Certainly in the top flight where they bounce from job to job. It’s like winning the lottery for them.

Spending should also be viewed relative to income to paint a clearer picture. Southampton’s total PL net spend over roughly 25 seasons (30% longer than us) is about -£16m, compared to Leicester’s -£136m, which highlights how different the clubs financial models are beyond headline expenditure totals. If you dial down further and look at the last 10 seasons, when both clubs have been in the same leagues, the contrast is even clearer. Leicester’s net spend is nearly 11 times higher than Southampton’s over the same period.

They have been in the Top flight 7 seasons longer than us.

In the last 3 years hasn’t Top wiped off nearly £320m of debt this shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Which in itself was unstable because the reality is we were selling players for ridiculous fees season after season to reduce the net spend. That just wasn’t an option that was going to last forever. Isn’t the reason the whole PSR thing is allegedly brought in to to encourage financial stability and slow growth down, so “smaller” clubs don’t live beyond their means (capacity, commercial revenue etc)

Not really, past caring it’s not going to change anything.

He has started 9 games and the last 4 he has started have all been defeats, it’s not like it’s not tried or tested, what happened to taking us up the pitch in the second half no shots on target for an hour. I’m not saying start Ayew, I think they are both pony and we should start the loans

Without watching given our ridiculous wage to turnover ratio and shit investment on players with little resale value should cover it