Jimothy

What were you replying about then? My post was making the point that bad oral health can lead to other illnesses which then put pressure on the NHS or even slow down recovering from others. You disagreed with that, I'm not sure what you were replying about if you wasn't replying to disagree with the idea that bad oral health can affect overall health.

Which is exactly why no part of frontline health should be profit driven. They should be doing what benefits the individuals health, not what will keep them coming back more often.

Well as I made the first comment about dentistry being brought under the NHS and oral health being very much part of overall health, I can tell you that's exactly what the discussion was about

That's Boro getting a penalty on Saturday then.

Who said it would repair it, but eating properly contributes to overall health and recovery from illness.

Who do you think fits false teeth?

Against Harrogate who've been in decent form of late.

Not being picky, you said all sides. Starmer has done the right thing as quickly as possible and you're criticising him, so I'm just pointing out how poorly the tories have managed situations recently. I assume by the way you post you lean to the Tories.

Well actually I said Labour dealt with this as quickly as possible whilst the tories have tried all the tricks in the book to ignore or hide their dodginess, so we don't agree.

Wow, you missed the point. Why does it have to be a heart problem? And if your teeth are painful, falling out or sensitive, preventing your from eating properly, you're not going to be able to get nourishment to the body to get over whatever illness you may have, including that heart problem.

Dentistry should be completely part of the NHS and free at the point of use, just like seeing a doctor or going to A+E or needing an operation. I have no idea why we don't consider oral health as important as the rest of the body. As people laspe in going to see the dentist because of the cost, and the state of their teeth deteriorate, the rest of their health is likely to be hit too, putting more pressure on an already struggling NHS.

Well that's not actually true is it? Comments came to light, that it seems Starmer accepted the reasoning behind them. More comments come to light on Sunday and they'd withdrawn support by Monday. Had action been taken too soon to remove him as a candidate then he could potentially have sued the party. There's some thought that the Mail sat on the second comments until it was too late to withdraw him, engineering this situation. What I do agree with is that there must have been someone better to stand. The vetting process failed. I also think it's a little ironic calling Labour out for not acting on the first comments and instead acting swftly on the 2nd ones and calling that indecisive when the Tories are keen on welcoming known antisemite Nigel Farage into the fold and were very slow, took no action or even tried to change the rules after Bone, Patel, Raab, and Patterson were all proven to have to have done various things such as bullying or taking dodgy payments.

BBC News - Steve Wright: Radio 2 presenter dies aged 69 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68287707

Fixed it for you.

Where did you hear it out of interest?

I was looking at that bit of my profile and I've got something called "Community Answer" which I have one. What's that?

Well I for one am shocked that a man like Christian Horner, with his lack of respect for anyone else and attitude issues, would behave in a reprehensible manner

BBC News - Ian Lavender: Dad's Army star dies aged 77 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-68204488 That's all the Dads Army cast gone now I think.

Speaker jumping the gun there and calling Starmer Prime Minister