Jimothy

Webb is at least making public apologies for the mistakes instead of just acting like they never happened. But situations like this are where refs need to be interviewed or provide statements to the media after games. I want to hear him explain that, not hide behind Webb.

Feel like panicking would have been blowing for the initial foul. He played advantage and then before a Spurs player even touched the ball pulled it back and gave the foul. It's just poor officiating by a poor official.

You can see him signal advantage as Haaland gets back up, them as the ball goes through the Grealish and it's clear he's away and in on goal he blows for the foul. What was going through his head?

BBC News - Former Chancellor Alistair Darling dies aged 70 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67578993

MP has some cheek asking for suspensions. Half the commons are under investigation and haven't been suspended. Think it's difficult whilst it's just an investigation. Look at Sigurdsson, never actually charged, was being investigated for 2 years and lost his job. Until actual charges are brought I don't think the clubs should be acting on accusations, unless it's a Greenwood situation where the evidence in the public domain makes their guilt obvious. I wouldn't use Mendy as an example as firstly he was charged and secondly he's very lucky to be found innocent.

BBC News - Dean Sullivan: Brookside actor dies aged 68 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-67575906

Also, don't know about anyone else but I read it as someone asking about 1994 being history made him feel old. In no way did I see a dig at the student.

Well that's the point of the thread. He scored 13 in his first season, 17 in the next and then the following season in around November he got the head injury after which the goals have dried up.

It's not particularly funny, but you really think that's the actual underground tannoy system giving that message out? Its clearly her mate behind the camera with a megaphone or something.

Not just people getting off transport. I went to Belfast in September, on the return flight the staff at Belfast Airport had decided to split the passengers into two lines, clearly signposted, one for the front 10 rows, and other for the back 9 (was only a small plane). Its a good idea, East Mids didn't bother with it, but it meant people weren't getting on at the front or back and pushing past people to get to the far end of the plane. We're in row 14 and queueing on the right and the left queue starts getting on first and it's just about gone and ours has started to move and is about half gone. This couple rock up late, flies past us down the now empty left queue and the woman of the pair goes "Oh is this the express boarding?" She didn't pay for express boarding, I know she didn't because it wasn't an option, so why she thought there would be an express line and also why she thought she was entitled to use it is beyond me. Of course, this meant she got on at the front (the crew should have turned her back) but was sat in row 18, so had to push all the way past everyone else to get to her seat, defeating the whole purpose of the two lines.

How are we supposed research the impact of roaming cats on wildlife if we take your route and stop them roaming?

Jimmy Gravile

Clearly they learnt nothing from Boaty McBoatface