RowlattsFox Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 Despite him playing pretty well against us, at 26 I can't help but think he'd be playing at a higher standard than the Danish League if he was consistently good. We have made a habit of making defenders look good this season.
MPH Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 If this would of been looked at early in January then this would of been the most feasible targets of them all - from a so-called lesser league, being paid lesser wages than some of our other targets... He'd of been keener and presumably cheaper than some of the prem targets we are supposedly looking at...
foxile5 Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 I'm having a good chuckle at the people who downplayed Steve Walsh's departure. This is why he was highly rated. Rudkin hasn't got the foggiest.
Max Power Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 Just now, foxile5 said: I'm having a good chuckle at the people who downplayed Steve Walsh's departure. This is why he was highly rated. Rudkin hasn't got the foggiest. Rudkin was DoF when Walsh was here wasn't he?
MattyFromLE Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 Just now, Max Power said: Rudkin was DoF when Walsh was here wasn't he? Signings at the start of the season were also Walsh signings.
foxile5 Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 1 minute ago, Max Power said: Rudkin was DoF when Walsh was here wasn't he? Oh yes, he was...but only a fool would think that the two are unrelated.
foxile5 Posted 31 January 2017 Posted 31 January 2017 Just now, MattyFromLE said: Signings at the start of the season were also Walsh signings. You mean the ones that went through, with little to no fuss? And were conducted in a timely manner? And weren't the subject of faffing around?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.