Latest Fan Advisory Board (FAB) Meeting

[1884HF]

26 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

Was this bit brought up by the club? Interesting wording of consequences for not using your season ticket.

maybe the consequence of 3 relegations in 4 years is why fans are no longer attending - maybe its because we are run by out of touch clowns who can't get anything right - tbf to them they do beat any team in the country by being so successful at disillusioning fans and driving people away which we cannot ignore

[FoxesTez]

51 minutes ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

Not saying you can't have more than one complaint, with some being more important than others.. but to see comments from those meeting minutes requesting "more discount for shirts", "better food stalls" and grassing on people vaping, when the club is on its arse with very little focus on that, is seriously depressing. 

 

Another day, another push closer to being done with it. I hate sharing my club with such ****ing melts.

Couldn’t really find the words but this sums up my feelings quite nicely. 
 

[davieG]

There was a discussion about declining matchday behaviour and some chants and comments crossing a line and contributing to families, in particular, not wanting to attend games, which it was felt contributed to the problems on the pitch.  

 

Declining from what level, I assume from when we were recently successful. I assume these people were never around the many times over the years when on and off the pitch we've been awful.

 

I don't go now from this season but I've never known the behaviour of our fans to be so passive, 

[CosbehFox]

46 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

Was this bit brought up by the club? Interesting wording of consequences for not using your season ticket.

It was a minor discussion point and it was universally rejected across the room

Edited 18 March by CosbehFox

[CosbehFox]

Just now, davieG said:

There was a discussion about declining matchday behaviour and some chants and comments crossing a line and contributing to families, in particular, not wanting to attend games, which it was felt contributed to the problems on the pitch.  

 

Declining from what level, I assume from when we were recently successful. I assume these people were never around the many times over the years when on and off the pitch we've been awful.

 

I don't go now from this season but I've never known the behaviour of our fans to be so passive, 

The chant which was described as being over the line was the one about stringing up Rudkin which absolutely was over the line. Plenty said at the time that football atmospheres thrive on an edgy atmosphere 

[Livid]

3 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

It was a discussion point and it was universally rejected across the room

It doesn’t read as universally rejected, ‘Applied with discretion’ ? 

[Collo73]

These ‘fan advisory groups’ do not speak on behalf of me and many more 🙋🏻‍♂️

[davieG]

1 minute ago, CosbehFox said:

The chant which was described as being over the line was the one about stringing up Rudkin which absolutely was over the line. Plenty said at the time that football atmospheres thrive on an edgy atmosphere 

Yeah that was but I've not seen or heard anything remotely on a par with what has been the norm in the past.

 

I shouldn't really comment as I don't go now for any number of reasons.

[Dan]

1 hour ago, Stuntman_Mike said:

Not saying you can't have more than one complaint, with some being more important than others.. but to see comments from those meeting minutes requesting "more discount for shirts", "better food stalls" and grassing on people vaping, when the club is on its arse with very little focus on that, is seriously depressing. 

 

Another day, another push closer to being done with it. I hate sharing my club with such ****ing melts.

Roll on the Steaua-esque split.

[1884HF]

10 minutes ago, davieG said:

There was a discussion about declining matchday behaviour and some chants and comments crossing a line and contributing to families, in particular, not wanting to attend games, which it was felt contributed to the problems on the pitch.  

 

Declining from what level, I assume from when we were recently successful. I assume these people were never around the many times over the years when on and off the pitch we've been awful.

 

I don't go now from this season but I've never known the behaviour of our fans to be so passive, 

call me crazy but when people are forking out stupid money week in week out to watch a group of overpaid uninterested players who - lets not beat around the bush - seem to resent the fanbase and have contributed with an inept board to now the 3rd relegation in 4 years then there will be aggressive chanting - nothing new

[Jackubu]

8 minutes ago, Collo73 said:

These ‘fan advisory groups’ do not speak on behalf of me and many more 🙋🏻‍♂️

Join one that does. Foxes Trust membership is still only a fiver and the more members we have, the more change we can push for. 

[CosbehFox]

5 minutes ago, Livid said:

It doesn’t read as universally rejected, ‘Applied with discretion’ ? 

That’s the clubs decision to minute that 

 

It certainly wasn’t how I viewed it being there at the time 

 

The FCC meetings are generally very critical and there’s a lot more nuance and a lot more discussed than what you see on these minutes. 
 

I’d say the issue with it is that you have too many voices which say a lot of information and what this fails to do is actually get at the root of anything. 
 

The comment about any club backed campaign being inauthentic was my own and the person whose being criticised for the ST comments went on a 5 minute passionate about how the club has failed to give the fanbase any hope or encouragement for this season or future seasons 

[CosbehFox]

Btw there’s no mention that numerous people within the meeting defended Union FS. And that they getting stick for other peoples views and chants etc 

[1884HF]

2 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

That’s the clubs decision to minute that 

 

It certainly wasn’t how I viewed it being there at the time 

 

The FCC meetings are generally very critical and there’s a lot more nuance and a lot more discussed than what you see on these minutes. 
 

I’d say the issue with it is that you have too many voices which say a lot of information and what this fails to do is actually get at the root of anything. 
 

The comment about any club backed campaign being inauthentic was my own and the person whose being criticised for the ST comments went on a 5 minute passionate about how the club has failed to give the fanbase any hope or encouragement for this season or future seasons 

you suggesting the club is twists the truth and being out of touch ? very unlike king power

[Globalfox]

On 09/11/2025 at 17:54, broughtonblue said:

Just read in the latest email from Fcc (7th November) that season ticket holders can access the match day programme in digital form on the app, has anybody seen this and if yes can you point out how to find it as I cant!

 

Edit

I'm a numpty, found it now!

Yes you can but it is not easy or intuitive. First thing in you have  to sign in as a member was not clear because you can be in the app but not signed in.when you are signed in as shown by the shirt with your name on scroll down and you will find the last match Programme. Took me a while to figure it out.

[Globalfox]

4 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Btw there’s no mention that numerous people within the meeting defended Union FS. And that they getting stick for other peoples views and chants etc 

You are exactly right sir. It’s a bit Yes Minister the episode about the official minutes are the recollection Tino of the minutes at the time the official minute taker chose to interpret the minutes. To all there are voices on the FCC who try to push but to be fair the staff are limited by what their bosses allow and their  bosses only allow what Top wants. Read the FAB rules of engagement so much is off topic. We do push and test the limits the minutes do not reflect at least at the FCC level what is fully said.

[Voll Blau]

Love how they think releasing the stats on why people didn't go to West Brom is some kind of gotcha too.

 

ONE person boycotting because they're fed up of your shit is too many, you fvcking idiots.

 

Oh, and hundreds of people aren't as committed as they used to be because of what you've done to our club. What a win!

[VLC86]

46 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

It was a minor discussion point and it was universally rejected across the room

Glad to hear it, alarming the club even consider discussing it though 😂

[VLC86]

1 hour ago, 1884HF said:

maybe the consequence of 3 relegations in 4 years is why fans are no longer attending - maybe its because we are run by out of touch clowns who can't get anything right - tbf to them they do beat any team in the country by being so successful at disillusioning fans and driving people away which we cannot ignore

Fair points, but that is reading as “how can we punish season ticket holders for not attending” and not trying to find a reason for the drop in attendance.

[Dan]

The club in total disarray and you've got people complaining they aren't paying enough for it.

 

Absolutely unbelievable.

[VLC86]

1 hour ago, Livid said:

I’ve just seen that, empty seats all around the stadium recently, one the brink of League one for the second time in our history and they talk of consequences for non attendance. 
 

I don’t miss the DD payment coming out but I also don’t miss going down there that much either. If they start with this shit I’m done. 
 

So totally out of touch it’s unbelievable! 

Mental isn’t it. Such a weird thing to bring to the table.

[Leicester_Loyal]

1 hour ago, Livid said:

I’ve just seen that, empty seats all around the stadium recently, one the brink of League one for the second time in our history and they talk of consequences for non attendance. 
 

I don’t miss the DD payment coming out but I also don’t miss going down there that much either. If they start with this shit I’m done. 
 

So totally out of touch it’s unbelievable! 

Yep, feel free to punish me for not using my ST, that'll be the reason I cancel it altogether.

[FOTS]

3 hours ago, CosbehFox said:

Ultimately the club shaping the minutes how they see fit. 

 

The point regards ST ticket increases was made by someone who feared that the club would at one point introduce a huge increase to catch up with other clubs rather than do smaller incremental increases which are manageable. It's been unfairly worded. 

 

I'd also say he's very passionate and he gets it more than 80% of people in that room. 

 

The ID check is an issue where the majority were for them. Me and a few others pointed out it's a symptom of the priority system. 

 

The delay behind the priority system is off really. They held a 90 minute session which was pro-change of it and then did a survey which basically had top priority point holders protecting their interest. The reality is if a proposed system showed that they would still be protected then that allays fears. 

Appreciate it’s easy to say, but moving forward, could the fan groups do their own set of minutes which document a more accurate picture?

 

Or better yet, my vote would be for them to collectively leave the Fan Engagement Framework altogether.

 

If the club are manipulating the minutes and releasing them to the public then I really don’t see how these meeetings serve any purpose. 

[VLC86]

If the minutes to these are very much shaped by the club, as it’s always been apparent when reading them, would there be any appetite from the @Foxes_Trust to publish their own view of these minutes?

 

I can understand why that might not be popular for people on the FAB, but I think it needs to be crystal clear what was discussed and whether it was the FAB that brought the issue to the table or the club, because at the minute that isn’t the case

 

Even bringing up the issue might drive some change.

[Wasyls Pec Deck]

It’s almost like they’ve planted people in there to say what they want