midtablethatsallwewilleverbe Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 what do you think... 1 rab douglas 2 alan maybury 3 patrik kisnorbo 4 paddy mccarthy 5 gareth mcauley 6 stephen hughes 7 gareth williams 8 james wesolowski 9 matty fryatt 10 iain hume 11 momo sylla 12 nils eric johansson 13 paul henderson 14 richard stearman 15 alan sheehan 16 chris o grady 17 danny tiatto 18 elvis hammond 19 conrad logan 20 mark de vries
The People's Hero Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 You're not expecting many new signings then? I think we should give an outfield player number 1. I've always wanted us to do that. I'm sad, you see?
midtablethatsallwewilleverbe Posted 5 June 2006 Author Posted 5 June 2006 how can i give the new signings squad numbers when i dont know who they are
Ric Flair Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 Charlton once did their squad numbers in alphabetical order, they had a striker with the number '1' His name escapes me know, he was crap anyway.
The People's Hero Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 Charlton once did their squad numbers in alphabetical order, they had a striker with the number '1' His name escapes me know, he was crap anyway. We should do it in order of how good Rob Kelly thinks they are and make this fact well publicised. That would cause some unrest and unrest is always funny.
Jimmy Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 what do you think... 1 rab douglas 2 alan maybury 3 patrik kisnorbo 4 paddy mccarthy 5 gareth mcauley 6 stephen hughes 7 gareth williams 8 james wesolowski 9 matty fryatt 10 iain hume 11 momo sylla 12 nils eric johansson 13 paul henderson 14 richard stearman 15 alan sheehan 16 chris o grady 17 danny tiatto 18 elvis hammond 19 conrad logan 20 mark de vries why move so many players around? this club has always tried to keep players numbers the same, hence matty elliott always wearing 18, dickov 22, TC 27 and so on
Guest Gist Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 I think McCarthy will keep the number 5 but other than that it looks about right.
Libertine Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 1 Douglas 2 Maybury 3 Kisnorbo 4 Hughes 5 McCarthy 6 Williams 7 New Signing/Sylla 8 Hume 9 New Signing/ De Vries? 10 ? 11 Tiatto 12 Fryatt 13 Henderson 14 McAuley? 15 Nils Eric 16 Weso? 17 Stearman 18 Hammond 19 Dodds? 20 21 22 Sheehan? 23 Hamill 24 Gerrbrand 25 26 O 'Grady? Or maybe he'll get number 10? 27 Conrad probably. Youngsters and new signing will probably fill in the rest. I doubt there'll be many changes at all.
Jimmy Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 1 Douglas 2 Maybury 3 Kisnorbo 4 Hughes 5 McCarthy 6 Williams 7 New Signing/Sylla 8 Hume 9 New Signing/ De Vries? 10 ? 11 Tiatto 12 Fryatt 13 Henderson 14 McAuley? 15 Nils Eric 16 Weso? 17 Stearman 18 Hammond 19 Dodds? 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Conrad probably. you forgot gerrbrand, o'grady, hammil and sheehan all played for the 1st team last season, plus chambers will get a number i'm sure
TAFKA Castroneves Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 1. Rab Douglas 2. Alan Maybury 3. Patrick Kisnorbo 4. Stephen Hughes 5. Patrick McCarthy 6. Gareth McAuley 7. Momo Sylla 8. Iain Hume 10. Mark de Vries 11. Danny Tiatto 12. Matty Fryatt 13. Paul Henderson 14. James Wesolowski 15. Nils-Eric Johansson 16. Gareth Williams 17. Richard Stearman 18. Elvis Hammond 19. Louis Dodds 20. Patrick Gerrbrand 21. Chris O'Grady 22. Alan Sheehan 23. Joe Hamill 24. Levi Porter 25. Conrad Logan Probably be something like that depending on who goes or stays.
dandannieldanok Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 Why dont we copy other nations teams and have players with numbers over 50 De Vries 99, i would like to see that
London_Fox Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 Is it just me that thinks this is largely irrelevant (except which youngsters get numbers)? Who cares what numbers people have and how can you guess at this stage in the summer.
Guest Gist Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 I think it's irrelevant too but there isn't much else going on at the minute.
Bert Posted 5 June 2006 Posted 5 June 2006 I think it's irrelevant too but there isn't much else going on at the minute. Oh reallly??
City_4_Life Posted 6 June 2006 Posted 6 June 2006 Some players have to have a certain number, its like a supistition (spelling?). But personally i would just be happy with what i got.
crazy horse Posted 7 June 2006 Posted 7 June 2006 personally i'd like to use letters ; like the tigers did long ago; my formation would be 4-3-3 U C R A P O L D G I T
Cobbo Posted 7 June 2006 Posted 7 June 2006 personally i'd like to use letters ; like the tigers did long ago; my formation would be 4-3-3 U C R A P O L D G I T Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag © Kayteh
Guest Posted 8 June 2006 Posted 8 June 2006 Is it just me that thinks this is largely irrelevant (except which youngsters get numbers)? Who cares what numbers people have and how can you guess at this stage in the summer. No it's not, and I think you've been largely ignored.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.