Who was better?

[Fez of Mahrez]

Helpful, me.

[OriginalRobboFOX]

Helpful, me.

cheers ears.

[lildave3]

Heskey, by far. I still love that guy, have him back before you could say 'Emile William Ivanhoe Heskey'

[Sparky]

heskey , awesome presence . although jj was a little belter too

[lcfc_jme]

Emile Heskey was better.

[lildave3]

Off topic but, JME, your sig is getting longer than a Thracian post.

[lcfc_jme]

Off topic but, JME, your sig is getting longer than a Thracian post.

no it isn't - that's humanly impossible

It's just 'cos the JME part is so big and the Fez quote takes up a fair bit of room as well (it's needed because a thread with me in quickly degenerates and turns into farce, and it saves him from constantly repeating it)

[Joe.]

IS it a bird or is it a plane, no it's an Emile Heskey going past your way!

[jumbo mills]

heskey by a country mile

[ooh Tommy]

Would have been interesting if they had played together.

[Wils]

Bruno id say,probably because i saw more of him play though.

[lookwhaticando]

Huskey.

[Bert]

Heskey. Had more to his game and played for England.

Even though Joachim is my 2nd favourite City player ever.

[Ricey]

Heskey was clumbsy and couldn't stay on his feet but he was always effective and so many goals involved his build up play.

[Strokes]

Joachim was more effective for city, but that was playing at lower level, and you only have too look at how there careers went after city to see the better player

[Dr The Singh]

Joachim was more effective for city, but that was playing at lower level, and you only have too look at how there careers went after city to see the better player

But Heskey made us 12 million, wasted by peter taylor though!!!

[Durnerz]

Heskey, used to score some crackers and players would just bounce off him.

[OBO]

BRUUUNO!