Flynny Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 Which begs the question, what the bollocks goes thru the minds of the other 60%? Flies. In one ear, a little buzz around the nice warm open space inside, and out again through the other ear.
Anish Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 My first post for a while (I've been travelling for the last 5 weeks) Glad to see results have improved. So I'm sticking with 'No'. Agreed with LWICD - fans on here are so fickle.
lookwhaticando Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 My first post for a while (I've been travelling for the last 5 weeks) Glad to see results have improved. So I'm sticking with 'No'. Agreed with LWICD - fans on here are so fickle. I could see you coming... I had a feeling which side of the fence you'd stand on this poll, too. I wasn't wrong, either.
l444ry Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 He shouldn't go because some half-baked supporters hound him out without appreciating the struggles he's had behind the scenes. Rather, he should leave because Leicester City are now in a different situation. A more experienced manager with extensive contacts is what we need. And when Rob Kelly does leave (hopefully head held high) I hope the second-rate players who got Kelly into this mess leave as well....for exactly the same reason.
Parsons Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 i always vote no as i did with Levein we must give managers more time...
lookwhaticando Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 i always vote no as i did with Levein we must give managers more time... So that's three of the always-vote-no people accounted for.
Head Honcho Posted 21 February 2007 Author Posted 21 February 2007 My first post for a while (I've been travelling for the last 5 weeks) Glad to see results have improved. So I'm sticking with 'No'. Agreed with LWICD - fans on here are so fickle. Welcome back buddy. Good time?
BartonFox Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 He shouldn't go because some half-baked supporters hound him out without appreciating the struggles he's had behind the scenes. Rather, he should leave because Leicester City are now in a different situation. A more experienced manager with extensive contacts is what we need. And when Rob Kelly does leave (hopefully head held high) I hope the second-rate players who got Kelly into this mess leave as well....for exactly the same reason. Erm hate to piss on your parade but that halfwit was involved in the majority of those signings, you know because of his extensive knowledge of the English game (T. Davies, 2003)
Kilworthfox Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 You lot seem to be very willing to forget that Rob Kelly is a mix of Cloughie, SAF, MON, and David Pleat all rolled into one!
l444ry Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 Erm hate to piss on your parade but that halfwit was involved in the majority of those signings, you know because of his extensive knowledge of the English game (T. Davies, 2003) And I suppose he was respomsible for Tony Blair taking us into Iraq as well.
davieG Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 And I suppose he was respomsible for Tony Blair taking us into Iraq as well. Sssssssh that's an Official Secret
Mort Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 And I suppose he was respomsible for Tony Blair taking us into Iraq as well. Maybe... ah Tony Blair, like Peter Taylor just on a bigger scale
Swedging Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 So that's three of the always-vote-no people accounted for. Add me to that list, please.
lookwhaticando Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 Add me to that list, please. Four. Welcome.
BartonFox Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 And I suppose he was respomsible for Tony Blair taking us into Iraq as well. WTF is that supposed to mean? As has been stated time and time again (and just for good measure I will do it again) Kelly has been a significant part of the problem on the field since his arrival. Why this makes him devoid of any blame in this department is something I am struggling to come to terms with in any capacity.
Aeropars Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 I'm happy for him to stay.... I don think hes that bad now hes got something to play with. Look on the bright side, we could have Graham Souness!
l444ry Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 WTF is that supposed to mean? As has been stated time and time again (and just for good measure I will do it again) Kelly has been a significant part of the problem on the field since his arrival. Why this makes him devoid of any blame in this department is something I am struggling to come to terms with in any capacity. Just how much a part of the "problem on the field" is subjective Barton. If a carpenter turned up on site and mitred his architrave with a bow saw you'd say he hasn't got the right tools, And you'd be right!!!
Tommeh Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 I know i'm in the minority here but I fell we should all back off and let Kelly do his job, I feel he's done ok this season with very limited resources, I think that other managers would have seen us really flurting around the relegation places. I think we should at least give him a chance til the end of the season and then see. with people going on about how he'll spend money, we all know how much MM likes to influence the players brought and its no coincidence that most players we've been linked with so far have connections with him previously. All I'm saying is wait til end of the season then see but I feel that Manderic will have a big say on players entering this football club
BartonFox Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 Just how much a part of the "problem on the field" is subjective Barton. If a carpenter turned up on site and mitred his architrave with a bow saw you'd say he hasn't got the right tools, And you'd be right!!! But when he has been able to pick and choose the tools and invest some reason able amounts in them either as an assistant or the head man he has picked up some rank rotten ones. So again another part of his myth gets blown out the water
Aeropars Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 I kind of agree, not sure what he was thinking when he bought Josh Low
Polyphonic Posted 21 February 2007 Posted 21 February 2007 I kind of agree, not sure what he was thinking when he bought Josh Low I think part of it was low wages no transfer cost and to be fair he had a good rep at Northampton !
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.