Simon Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I bet it's someone completely out of the blue..just like Allen was and Worthlesston before him! That's harsh, considering he had a big hand in keeping us up last season.
Craig Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 That's harsh, considering he had a big hand in keeping us up last season. We could have gained nil points and we'd have still stayed up
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I would like to see Carl Cort come on for De Vries in the second half, because it sounds like he is gettin tackled to easily and giving away possesion.It also sounds like a open game with maybe Plymouth having the better chances, i would be happy with a point today but i have a feeling we might nick all three. I don't think Cort is particularly fit for a start. Also when he played for the Reserves at Telford the Reserves tended to hit far too many balls in the air to him, with little effect. Cue a decisive contribution from the lad.
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Why make a substitution so close to half-time. Why not make it during the break?. Cort on for DeVries. Porter on for Mattock.
Brenfox Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I give Cort 10 minutes before he is on the deck with a torn hamstring or ruptured spleen.
Fox in a Box Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 how we playing I aint got the leics radio today! talksport only!
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 City's inability to attack balls into the box again apparent as Porter free kick goes to waste.
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I give Cort 10 minutes before he is on the deck with a torn hamstring or ruptured spleen. Ah Brenda, whilst we're waiting do you fancy a.......you know?
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I cannot understand our tactics. Beaglehole NEVER has his defenders standing off. And having Rudkin sat next to Mandaric is no comfort.
Brenfox Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Unless your a fan of the old sausage then no. Screen names can be decieving.
TheBlinding Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 City's inability to attack balls into the box again apparent as Porter free kick goes to waste. What about Crystal Palace?
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 What about Crystal Palace?I didn't go to Palace. Was it the defenders or DeVries making the impact?Come on Leicester. Get up the sodding field.
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Unless your a fan of the old sausage then no. Screen names can be decieving. Shame, I'm sitting in an empty house as I'm moving out today, we could have used any room, if you were a bird we would have had a ruddy good time. Sorry chief
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Shame, I'm sitting in an empty house as I'm moving out today, we could have used any room, if you were a bird we would have had a ruddy good time. Sorry chief Kishishev on for Campbell.
Simon Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I cannot understand our tactics. Beaglehole NEVER has his defenders standing off.And having Rudkin sat next to Mandaric is no comfort. I would suggest therefore that academy football and first-team football are a little different then, no?
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 This isn't football, this is bollucks!!
Simon Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Kishishev for DJ Would rather suggest that we might want to stick it out for a point?
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I would suggest therefore that academy football and first-team football are a little different then, no? As I've said before, we wouldn't know because we've never tried being anything but cautious. And why we've reverted so dramatically from last weeks tactics just because we're away I really don't understand cos a point won't get us nearer the play-off places and the chances of us losing are increassing all the time. We're clearly demonstrating once again that having two up front is not sufficient to guarantee us goals. We need to play 4-3-3 because no two of our strikers are strong enough. Inevitable that said, Hume with our first decent shot of the half. Rowett reflecting modern thinking. As long as they don't score it's half decent." How sodding pathetic.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.