GianEmmo Zola Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Lates...1187762,00.html Side for Ipswich Fulop Stearman NGotty Kisnorbo Sheehan Hume Clemence King Mattock Campbell Cort Bench Mcauley Henderson Chambers John Hayes
Brainy Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 I think you'll get a few people there Good news though.
danny. Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop Stearman NGotty Kisnorbo Sheehan Hume Clemence King Mattock Campbell Cort Bench Mcauley Henderson Chambers John Hayes is that a side you have made up? Why would Fryatt not be a part of it? No chance he will play N'Gotty either...
The Stig Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Thank the lord, lets hope we'll see some goals, proper goals. The last two at home have been a wonder goal and a fluke.
Thracian Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Lates...1187762,00.htmlSide for Ipswich Fulop Stearman NGotty Kisnorbo Sheehan Hume Clemence King Mattock Campbell Cort Bench Mcauley Henderson Chambers John Hayes Why would Sheehan suddenly be playing? Holloway's got one more player to choose from compared to the WBA squad. Sheehan would seem to have less chance of playing rather than more. Leave the side to lose a bit longer I'd say. Get the message home properly. And why pick him at left back? Mattock's fit now and he's the left-back. It's been written. You're trying to set Sheehan up with some far post defending. I know what you're doing. Another thing too...that looks a decent side. So you've got no chance. Where's our statutory jokers - the players Holloway "wants to have a look at?"
Bert Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop Stearman Sheehan McAuley Kisnorbo Hume Hayes Clem King Cort Fryatt Subs: Hendo N'Gotty Campbell Chambers Mattock
Jack Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop N'Gotty Kisnorbo McAuley Mattock Hume Clemence King Hayes Campbelll Fryatt Subs Henderson Stearman Sheehan Cort John
Thracian Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 I hate that cliché. I've put it in quotes just so you don't think it's mine. At least I hope that's the one you mean!
Bert Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop N'Gotty Kisnorbo McAuley Mattock Hayes Clemence King Hayes Campbelll Fryatt Subs Henderson Stearman Sheehan Cort John
danny. Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 good, I've been saying to clone him for a while!
Bryn Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Another thing too...that looks a decent side. So you've got no chance. Where's our statutory jokers - the players Holloway "wants to have a look at?" Quiet down now.
lookwhaticando Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 I've put it in quotes just so you don't think it's mine. At least I hope that's the one you mean! I meant the "three new signings" thing. Kelly used it all the time. Having Andy Johnson back was like "signing a new player!" as it was when Fryatt returned (many times, briefly)...
johnnycash Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop J. Chambers Kisnorbo McCauley Mattock Hume King Clemence Sheehan Fryatt John Subs: Stearman Campbell N'Gotty Hayes Cort PLEASE NO STEARMAN!!
RowlattsFox Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Although Campbell and John are both back in training, i would be suprised to see them both involved tomorrow. James Chambers was supposed to be back in training last week but Ollie doesnt mention him so i'll assume hes not playing. ........................Fulop Stearman..N'Gotty...Kisnorbo..Mattock .....Hume..King..Clemence...Sheehan .................Fryatt..Cort Subs: Henderson, McAuley, Hayes, A Chambers, Campbell/John If Kenton is fit then i would play him at right back but no doubt he will play centre midfield instead of King. Hayes has only played the home games since Holloway took over so I dont expect him to start, although I thought Mattock and Hayes worked well together on Saturday.
davieG Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop Stearman N'Gotty Kisnorbo SheehanClemenceHume ------- King ------- HayesDJ Fryatt
danny. Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Mattock deserves to play, he has a good game on Saturday, much better work rate and defending than Sheehan.
The Stig Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Well seeing as this seems to be a team for Ipswich thread. Fulop Chambers N Gotty Kisnorbo Sheean Hume Clemence King Hayes John Campbell Subs: Henderson McAuley, Kenton, Fryatt, Cort
johnnycash Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 A poll on this site has the vast majority of fans saying that Stearman should be axed. Yet most people here seem to have him in the team for tomorrow. The best Right-back at the club (although he's only played less than a game and a half in this position sincing signing), and the most succesful at this level of football, is James Chambers. Surely if he is fit he should play instead of Rodders!!
Thracian Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Fulop N'Gotty Kisnorbo McAuley Mattock Hayes Clemence King Hayes Campbelll Fryatt Subs Henderson Stearman Sheehan Cort John N'Gotty at right-back? What is with you folk and our centre-backs? N'Gotty's like one of those old roadgoing steam tractors. You'll need a water tank with a big tube on the sidelines to quench his thirst. The bloke is great. Like a one-man Roman defensive square. Even glue would bounce off him. But if he was a horse he'd be a shire horse not a racehose. He belongs in the Bass Museum not charging around like a contestant in the Epsom Derby. Show some mercy. He needs to be in the middle attracting the ball like a giant radar dish and rolling it out to his bewildered midfielders. I know Stearman's suddenly become as popular as a Leicester version of Hannibal Lecter now Chambers is fit but replacing him with N'Gotty shows the sort of hatred the Sudanese show for harmless women teachers. What do you reckon? Two hundred lashes for Stearman as well? Can't imagine what you'd to the lad if we actually started shipping goals at the rate of other teams.
The Stig Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 Mattock deserves to play, he has a good game on Saturday, much better work rate and defending than Sheehan. I must have been watching a different Joe Mattock.
danny. Posted 10 December 2007 Posted 10 December 2007 I must have been watching a different Joe Mattock. you were probably watching "joe maddox" that birch was going on about.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.