Wezleylowski Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Thought Stears was very good today. Well timed tackles, vital interceptions, he virtually neutralised the right flank. This is why we get frustrated with him because we know of his potential. He should be proud of that performance.
Simi Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 Stearman - 7 Kisnorbo - 7 McAuley - 7 Mattock - 6 Chambers - 6 Clemence - 7 N Gotty - 7 Hume - 7 Fryatt - 6 John - 5 Collins John was a huge dissapointment for me today, always stayed offside and never made an effort to get back onside. Missed two glorious chances to win the game for us. When he had the chances he looked really lazy. Gutted.
Ultra Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 Stearman - 6 (deducted 1 for a flash of temper which could have got him sent off, fortunately not spotted by the ref) McAuley - 7 Kisnorbo - 7 Mattock - 7 Chambers - 6 N'Gotty - 6 Clemence - 6 Hume - 8* (excellent goal, covered every blade of grass tonight) John - 6 (at least he got into scoring positions) Fryatt - 5 (faded badly in the second half) Hayes - 6 Kenton - 6
act smiley Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 - Solid, as always. Stearman - 8 The kind of performance we all wish he turned in every week. Can't think of anything exceptionally bad from him, although the passing could still do with being a little better. Kisnorbo - 6 Mostly good, but caught out once or twice. Completely static on their disallowed goal. McAuley - 7 A reliable performance, but nothing exceptional. Mattock - 6 Got beaten a few times, but did a reasonable job and got forward quite well at times. Chambers - 7 Great workrate and did rather well, I thought. Worked well with Stearman too. Clemence - 7 A solid game, but didn't really impose himself on it that much. N Gotty - 6 He had a role to do, and he more or less did it, but wasn't quick enough on several occasions, and like when Levein tried Kisnorbo in a similar role, I don't think his passing is quite up to it. Hume - 8 Put in the effort, scored a good goal and generally played well. Fryatt - 6 Had a reasonable game and had a few flashes of quality, but struggled to really create much. John - 6 Created a few chances, but completely wasted them. He seemed to be very rusty.
Leicester Lass Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop 7Stearman 8 McAuley 8 Kisnorbo 7 Mattock 6 N'Gotty 7 Chambers 6 Clemence 7 Hume 7 Fryatt 6 John 6 Can't argue with that too much.
lee7 Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 Stearman - 8- best game he has had for a long time Kisnorbo - 7- should have done better for there goal but generally good defending McAuley - 7- good defending Mattock - 6 Chambers -7 Clemence -7- good tackling N Gotty - 7 Hume - 8- great free kick Fryatt - 7 John - 6- should have finished his second chance but good movement to get into the goal scoring positions
BedsFox Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Without looking at other ratings yet Fulop 7 Solid Stearman 7 Good game, controlled Jarvis well, in fact much better than Mattock did when Jarvis changed sides McAuley 7 Solid Kisnorbo 6 Equally solid until he stopped tracking back in the last few strides before the equaliser Mattock 6 Looks better going forward than defending, several nice attacking crosses Chambers 6, Hard running decent game Clemence 6 Solid as a defensive midfielder, creatively zilch NGotty 7, Effective in the role in front of the back 4 Hume 7.5 Great goal Fryatt 8 Caused them all sorts of problems first half John 5, two 1-on-1s has to finish at least one of them. Lazy as usual, but got into the right positions which was encouraging Subs, not on long enough
Flexx Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop 7Stearman 7.5 McAuley 7 Kisnorbo 7 Mattock 7 N Gotty 7 Clemence 6.5 Chambers 7 Hume 8 Fryatt 7 John 6.5 Subs not on long enough to judge. Did you go?
Daz.I Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop 7Stearman 8 McAuley 8 Kisnorbo 6 could have been tighter for their goal Mattock 6 N'Gotty 7 outpaced but he is getting on Chambers 6 Clemence 7 Hume 7 best free kick he has hit in a Leicester shirt Fryatt 7 John 6
Mikey Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 - What he had to do he did with minimal fuss. Stearman - 7.5 - Good defensively and always willing to get forward. Best performance for a while. Kisnorbo 7 Mcauley 7 Mattock 6.5 Did well but got ripped a couple of times. Brilliant strength for a young las though. Chambers - 7 - Always full of running. N'Gotty 7 Clemence 7.5 Tidy and did well. Hume - 8 - Looking back to his best, great goal worked hard and passed well. Would have been a 9 but he got caught in possession a couple of times. Fryatt 6.5 John 5 - woeful in front of goal.
potter3 Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Fulop - 7 *Stearman - 8* McAuley - 7 Kisnorbo - 7 Mattock - 6 N'Gotty - 7 Chambers - 7 Clemence - 7 Hume - 7 Fryatt - 6 John - 6
Dames Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 Fulop - 7Stearman - 6 (deducted 1 for a flash of temper which could have got him sent off, fortunately not spotted by the ref) McAuley - 7 Kisnorbo - 7 Mattock - 7 Chambers - 6 N'Gotty - 6 Clemence - 6 Hume - 8* (excellent goal, covered every blade of grass tonight) John - 6 (at least he got into scoring positions) Fryatt - 5 (faded badly in the second half) Hayes - 6 Kenton - 6 It wasn't malicious though, he stuck his arm out to stop Jarvis coming from that side of him but caught him in the face because Jarvis seemed to be ducking a fair bit.
The Reverend Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 Fulop- As per. We need to sign him big time. Just never makes a mistake or even looks like hes going to. Stearman- This is what frustrates people. Played very well today, but why does it take us to be in front of the cameras for him to perform? His best performance for a long while. Kizza- Solid, should of got tighter for their goal, great defender but not much else. Big Mac- See above. Mattock- Poor. Not quick enough for a full back. Gets skinned when against pacy opposition and looked seriously out of his depth. Whips a good ball in though. Try him at left midfield. N'Gotty- Difficult one to rate - lots of effort, a few good balls but was pretty anonymous.The one thing with N'Gotty is he always offers a pass out of defence which was good for the hoofers at the back today. At his age though, i think playing in midfield is too much. Clem- Spectator most of the time. I think he holds the midfield well together, but he isnt the type of player that will create something out of nothing. Needs someone creative alongside him. Chambers- Great energy, constant harrying, but his passing is not good enough to play in midfield. Hume- Brilliant free kick, but not much else. Strikers are paid to score and he did that. Fryatt- Frustrating. Showed some glimpses of what a good player he can become. Too inconsistent. John- Poor, poor and poor again. Two clear cut chances, one on ones, and he couldnt put either away. Extremely disappointing. Was'nt match fit, you could tell, and i will put his misses down to that. In the first half, it was clear we had a game plan - suffocate them and dont let there creative players a chance to do what they do best. I think the energy and drive of Chambers, as well as the the calmness of N'gotty helped the midfield in this department, and it was not pretty, but Ollies tactics seemed to be working. Then their class showed, we seemed to tire after the energetic first half performance, and they hit us on the breakway after we had a free kick in an attacking position. Perhaps should of brought Kenton on earlier i thought to liven the midfield up, especially with Eastwood and Keogh coming on.
Tommy G Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 Fulop - 7 Stearman 8 Kisnorbo 6.5 McAuley 6.5 Mattock - 6 Chambers 7 N'Gotty 7 Clemence 5.5 Hume - 7.5 John - 4.5 Fryatt - 5.5
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 I think people have been a bit harsh on Fryatt i thought he was very lively first half and faded out second because the delivery was very poor. Hume every time i see him play i like him more and more just never stops he is the sort of player every manager would love in there squad
Geo V Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 I love these ratings threads after a live game, because it just goes to show that despite us watching the same game from the same kind of angle, we all see things and rate things so differently! Anyway I`ll go for.... Fulop 7 Stearman 8 McAuley 7.5 Kisnorbo 8 Mattock 6 N'Gotty 7 Chambers 7 Clemence 7.5 Hume 7 Fryatt 7 John 6.5 John did well and got into good positions and was in the peno box which is what we need. He would have scored higher had he converted one of the two good chances he had. Clemence was very good, blocking, intercepting and giving simple passes whilst the defence were impressive, especially Stearman and Kisnorbo although once again young Mattock was the weakest link back there. Hopefully with more games under his belt he`ll learn the position a lot better than he does at the moment. N`Gotty was good but he hasn't got the legs anymore and Fryatt does what he does, some great touches, lovely runs and no end product which leaves me banging my head against the wall in frustration as he could be a real handful at this level. Good display, full of hunger and looked dare I say it....ORGANIZED!!
breadandcheese Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 I don't understand the high ratings for Kisnorbo. He lost his man terribly for their goal in what is the most basic of errors. Wolves only had one man in the box, that was the only threat and Kisnorbo was nowhere near. Add to that his distribution from the back, which continually put us under pressure. When Wolves were in the ascendency, we needed to keep the ball for a bit. Now all players were guilty of this, but the back four need to realise (and particularly Kisnorbo being the marshall of the defence) that they will usually be under less pressure when passing the ball about. I think one example summed it up for me in the middle of the second half when Kisnorbo dribbled 4 or 5 yards slowly out of defence to be closed down and then under pressure hoof it upfront where Wolves took possession to build another attack. Of all the things he could have done, that was possibly the worst option bar dribbling and hoofing it into our own goal.
Simon Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 Fulop 7 Steaman 7.5 Kisnorbo 6 McAuley- 7 Mattock- 5.5 N'Gotty 7 Hume 7 Clem 6.5 Chambers 6 Fryatt 6 John 6 Subs not enough time to impress. Ollie 6- Set us up exactly right and we looked very organised and half-decent going forard. BUT Kenton and Hayes should have been on earlier. Kenton to counter the maurauding forward runs of Keogh and Eastwood when N'Gotty was clearly tiring and Hayes to provide some useful impetus down the left.
maddog Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 all 7s 8 for Fryatt and N Gotty Fryatt played really well and N Gotty even better in midfield.
.png.0e7438f54a80a2f2566907f77fd7a32a.thumb.png.0ea5e31693d284629c473304eabd4568.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.