Thracian Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 GRADEL GRADEL GRADEL.FOR FU CK SAKE, THE ANSWER IS OBVIOUS. GRADEL ME UP AND DO IT NOW. It's too late to shout about Gradel now.
The People's Hero Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 It's too late to shout about Gradel now. Is it? Fu ck. Why am I always the last to be told about deadlines. *hangs head in semi-aroused shame*
Manwell Pablo Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Theres no question we lack both quality and depth on both wings (RECALL GRADEL) but I wouldn't say "it's our problem." We have alot of problems of which it is one.
Thracian Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Theres no question we lack both quality and depth on both wings (RECALL GRADEL) but I wouldn't say "it's our problem." We have alot of problems of which it is one. Personnel-wise it's the biggest one so logically the first thing to put right. Mostly though I think our problems are down to lack of unifying leadership.
The People's Hero Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Personnel-wise it's the biggest one so logically the first thing to put right.Mostly though I think our problems are down to lack of unifying leadership. Lack of enterprise. Lack of confidence. Lack of a real game plan. It's all quite worrying. Well, it would be, if I'd not learnt how not to care.
davieG Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 The problem's in their heads, they just think they are good enough to win!
Thracian Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 The problem's in their heads, they just think they are good enough to win! Or that they're not good enough to win once the first goal goes in and that's hardly surprising - in 34 League games we've only scored two goals or more 8 times.
Simi Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 I find it painful to read such posts as "this player is in form sign him" Complete stupidity.
CaptainClemence Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Its a combination of both. I would vote for both options.
MC Prussian Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 GRADEL GRADEL GRADEL.FOR FU CK SAKE, THE ANSWER IS OBVIOUS. GRADEL ME UP AND DO IT NOW. Let him save Bournemouth single-handedly and then get him back for the start of next season. In the Championship.
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Not just wings - midfield - they don't work as a cohesive unit. The defense shows it at times hence the good defensive record - mean how many goals have we scored from midfield? Not that many, I reckon Stearman has got more than them put together! (If you discount Hume.)
Daz.I Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 It's lack of quality on the wings and upfront. Nathan Dyer would bea great signing he terrorised us bigtime at walkers.
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 I imagine he always been like that. Able to produce "a good interview" and a disapppointment thereafter. I've suspected it from the start really because of how quickly his mother club were prepared to put him out on loan and potentially agree a fee for him. Surely while there's an element of that in every player to go on loan, it's not uncommon to have players click with new teams where they were pure pish at their old clubs. He certainly looked the goods v Cov.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.