Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lookwhaticando

Colchester Player Ratings

By lookwhaticando, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Father Ted

Father Ted

Posted
Posted

Henderson 6 - Not much to do, 1 good save.

Stearman 7 - Tried

Kisnorbo 4.5 - HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFF!!!

Bruno 5 - Didn't really get involved.

Clapham 5.5 - Steady

Bell 6 - Average.

Hendrie 6.5 - Tried, not much went his way

Oakley 6.5 - Won a lot of the 2nd balls.

Hayles 6 - Determined.

Howard 4 - Eeyore!

Dj 5 - What was dumbass doing putting him on the wing?

Subs:-

Hume 6.5 - Really made an impact.

Fryatt 3 - T*at

Mcauley 5.5 - Start him upfront every game instead of Eeyore.

Ollie - 0

Fans - 9

syston_fox

syston_fox

Posted
Posted

Im not wasting my time on doing it for all of them but:

Hayles - 7 - head down and ran at the opposition. Not the greatest skill wise but he'd hastle the opposition and get stuck in when he needed too. Presented with two chances - one offside because DJ touched it but he still took it wide of the keeper and passed it into the net from a tight angle and the other was the header which he put in the net. Wrongly flagged offside from what Ive heard. 2 chances and both ended in the net.Tried hard and gave his all.

Howard - 1 - whats the point?

DJ - 2 - Two great chances, twice hit straight at the keeper. Useless.

Fryatt - 0- Best natural finisher at the club? He was woeful as he has been for ages. How many great chances has he missed for us now? Look at the one against Southampton and the ones today - how important could those extra three points be? And the thing that really pissed me off - he got in a great position and all he had to do was pass it across and it was an open goal for Hume or whoever to tap in.... what does he do? Cut inside and get it trapped under his feet. ball greedy tosser!

Man running on pitch - 0 - twat!!! What good did that do except break up an attack we were putting together up the right hand side?

Koke

Koke

Posted
Posted

Fair play to Iain Hume. For all his faults and his haters, he really had a big impact when he came on and he saved our arses.

Thracian

Thracian

Posted
Posted

Henderson 6 (One terrific save but hopelessly at fault for their goal. I know the six yard area was a quagmire but that cross was his responsibility, he should certainly have communicated and, yes, there was no excuse for Clapham letting their striker get goal side).

Clapham 4.5 (Bit part game. At fault with his marking for the goal and struggling without a proper winger in tandem. But that said he just doesn't make anything happen. Our left side was virtually sterile.

Kisnorbo 5 (Today summed the bloke up. He mostly defends okay but when he's in possession, either in open play or as a free-kick taker, you might as well close your eyes because the ball so rarely goes to one of our men.

Bruno 6 (Steady enough)

Stearman 7.5 (Tried everything Clapham didn't. Yes he made mistakes but he and Bell were always going to be our main source of a goal and finally the equalising cross came from their department. As for Colchester's winger he was never going to get a sniff).

Hayles 6.25 (Great start. Glancing header and tap in disallowed and might have made another goal. Pity he's not got staying power).

Oakley 5 (Never stamped any authority on the game. City were a midfielder light and it showed for an hour or so)

Hendrie 7.5 (Like all our better players he made mistakes but didn't hide and was forever trying to fashion a breakthrough, rally the team and galvanise the fans)

Bell 6.5 (Some good crosses which should have produced more and seemed to work well with Stearman).

Howard 4.5 (His hold up play and lay-offs were all he had to offer and then only part time. He looked slow, lacking any sort of leap, posed no threat in the box and looked just like another Horsfield. Our team needs pace and movement not a carthorse).

Campbell 6 (One early cross should have produced the goal to give us the lead but faded after his promising start which is understable after his time out).

Subs

Hume 8 (His goal may prove priceless to our club. He saved our season, perhaps only temporarily, but saved it nevertheless. How badly we needed his movement and scampering challenges)

Fryatt 6 (Again, despite his missed chance, provided a new headache for Colchester whose defence might well have fallen apart had we started the second half with the forwards we finished with).

McAuley 6 (Effective as the bull in the china shop. Provided a rare tactical plus mark for Holloway but you have to say it was right move/wrong time).

--------------------

General lee

General lee

Posted
Posted

Henderson 6 - Made about 1 save

Stearman 6 - Too fooking fancy at times but tried.

Kisnorbo 5 - Not alot to do but crap

Bruno 5 - See above

Clapham 5 - Did ok at times but still backs out and crap crossing

Bell 6 - Lee Philpott !! This guy is Lee Philpott

Hendrie 5- Worst game he's had for us

Oakley 5 - Crap and people don't seem to say anything about him

Hayles 6 - Good old Bazza, had ago

Howard 1 - SHITE

Dj - 2 - Runs and runs but shit

Subs:-

Hume 7 - Class act

Fryatt 3 - GET RID

Mcauley - 4 - Can't remember him doing anything

Ollie - 0 - Make a joke about this you willy puller

clazkel

clazkel

Posted
Posted
Henderson 6 (One terrific save but hopelessly at fault for their goal. I know the six yard area was a quagmire but that cross was his responsibility, he should certainly have comjmunicated and, yes, there was no excuse for Clapham letting their striker get goal side).

Clapham 4.5 (Bit part game. At fault with his marking for the goal and struggling without a proper winger in tandem. But that said he just doesn't make anything happen. Our left side was virtually sterile.

Kisnorbo 5 (Today summed the bloke up. He mostly defends okay but when he's in possession, either in open play or as a free-kick taker, you might as well close your eyes because the ball so rarely goes to one of our men.

Bruno 6 (Steady enough)

Stearman 7.5 (Tried everything Clapham didn't. Yes he made mistakes but he and Bell were always going to be our main source of a goal and finally the equalising cross came from their department. As for Colchester's winger he was never going to get a sniff).

Hayles 6.25 (Great start. Glancing header disallowed and might have made another goal. Pity he's not got staying power).

Oakley 5 (Never stamped any authority on the game. City were a midfielder light and it showed for an hour or so)

Hendrie 7.5 (Like all our better players he made mistakes but didn't hide and was forever trying to fashion a breakthrough, rally the team and galvanise the fans)

Bell 6.5 (Some good crosses which should have produced more and seemed to work well with Stearman).

Howard 4.5 (His hold up play and lay-offs were all he had to offer and then only part time. He looked slow, lacking any sort of leap, posed nop threat in the box and looked just like another Horsfield. Our team needs pace and movement not a carthorse).

Campbell 6 (One early cross should have produced the goal to give us the lead but faded after his promising start which is understable after his time out).

Subs

Hume 8 (His goal may prove priceless to our club. He saved our season, perhaps only temporarily, but saved it nevertheless. How badly we needed his movemeent and scampering challenges)

Fryatt 6 (Again, despite his missed chance, provided a new headache for Colchester whose defence might well have fallen apart had we started the second half with the forwards we finished with).

McAuley 6 (Effective as the bull in the china shop. Provided a rare tactical plus mark for Holloway but you have to say oit was right move/wrong time).

--------------------

Agree with all of the above.

Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted

Hendo 6

Stearman 7

Kisnorbo 5

Bruno 5

Clapham 6

Hayles 7

Bell 5

Oakley 6

Hendrie 5

DJ 5

Howard 3

Hume 6

Fryatt 4

McAuley 5

filbertboy

filbertboy

Posted
Posted
Henderson 6 (One terrific save but hopelessly at fault for their goal. I know the six yard area was a quagmire but that cross was his responsibility, he should certainly have communicated and, yes, there was no excuse for Clapham letting their striker get goal side).

Clapham 4.5 (Bit part game. At fault with his marking for the goal and struggling without a proper winger in tandem. But that said he just doesn't make anything happen. Our left side was virtually sterile.

Kisnorbo 5 (Today summed the bloke up. He mostly defends okay but when he's in possession, either in open play or as a free-kick taker, you might as well close your eyes because the ball so rarely goes to one of our men.

Bruno 6 (Steady enough)

Stearman 7.5 (Tried everything Clapham didn't. Yes he made mistakes but he and Bell were always going to be our main source of a goal and finally the equalising cross came from their department. As for Colchester's winger he was never going to get a sniff).

Hayles 6.25 (Great start. Glancing header disallowed and might have made another goal. Pity he's not got staying power).

Oakley 5 (Never stamped any authority on the game. City were a midfielder light and it showed for an hour or so)

Hendrie 7.5 (Like all our better players he made mistakes but didn't hide and was forever trying to fashion a breakthrough, rally the team and galvanise the fans)

Bell 6.5 (Some good crosses which should have produced more and seemed to work well with Stearman).

Howard 4.5 (His hold up play and lay-offs were all he had to offer and then only part time. He looked slow, lacking any sort of leap, posed no threat in the box and looked just like another Horsfield. Our team needs pace and movement not a carthorse).

Campbell 6 (One early cross should have produced the goal to give us the lead but faded after his promising start which is understable after his time out).

Subs

Hume 8 (His goal may prove priceless to our club. He saved our season, perhaps only temporarily, but saved it nevertheless. How badly we needed his movement and scampering challenges)

Fryatt 6 (Again, despite his missed chance, provided a new headache for Colchester whose defence might well have fallen apart had we started the second half with the forwards we finished with).

McAuley 6 (Effective as the bull in the china shop. Provided a rare tactical plus mark for Holloway but you have to say it was right move/wrong time).

--------------------

Just about with you on all of that just dont think Clapham should have played he was awful today not worth more than 4.....was mattock injured ??

Candidcamera

Candidcamera

Posted
Posted

Hendo 5

Stears 7

N'Gotty 4

Kisnorbo 5

Clapham 4

hayles 2

Hendrie 5

Oakley 5

Bell 5

Howard 2

DJ 2

subs: Hume 7, Fryatt 6, McAuley 7.

Holloway 0. Worst management so far this season. This match was so there for the taking.

clazkel

clazkel

Posted
Posted
Just about with you on all of that just dont think Clapham should have played he was awful today not worth more than 4.....was mattock injured ??

I was annoyed when they announced the team, and Clapham was in for Mattock. Ollie said on the radio after the game that Mattock was abit shakey (or something along them lines) last week against Sheffield Utd and i think he went for experience in Clapham, but i would've stuck with Mattock as he is a better option going forward. I felt against Sheffield Utd Mattock got isolated quite alot coz we were down to 10 men. Stick with Mattock!

LcFc D3C

LcFc D3C

Posted
Posted
True he did do more than Howard but he wouldnt know what to do up there for a full 90.

well he did well flickin balls on and won more than howard so maybe he should be like dion dublin

Narborough Bod

Narborough Bod

Posted
Posted
well he did well flickin balls on and won more than howard so maybe he should be like dion dublin

I may be alone here but I think the overall problem was with the tactical changes.

I thought we had the better of them in the first half and cut their very square defence open a few times. Had we had the composure to stay on side I think we could have been fine. However, swapping Hayles and Campbell took the wind out of the sales, hence the poor 2nd half showing. Showed a lack of belief, and panic from the management.

To then take off both big men, leaving Fryatt, Hume and Campbell up front, whilst continuing to hoof long balls up and attempt to put crosses in all of the time defied belief. Final straw to send a keeper up when we are drawing, not losing, showed inccompetance IMO.

I have defended Holloway on here before and I know this is supposed to be player ratings but for tactical nous, I would give Holloway 1 (and that is only for realising we had no height and sticking McAuley up front)

Kilworthfox

Kilworthfox

Posted
Posted
I may be alone here but I think the overall problem was with the tactical changes.

I thought we had the better of them in the first half and cut their very square defence open a few times. Had we had the composure to stay on side I think we could have been fine. However, swapping Hayles and Campbell took the wind out of the sales, hence the poor 2nd half showing. Showed a lack of belief, and panic from the management.

To then take off both big men, leaving Fryatt, Hume and Campbell up front, whilst continuing to hoof long balls up and attempt to put crosses in all of the time defied belief. Final straw to send a keeper up when we are drawing, not losing, showed inccompetance IMO.

I have defended Holloway on here before and I know this is supposed to be player ratings but for tactical nous, I would give Holloway 1 (and that is only for realising we had no height and sticking McAuley up front)

They had 6 in defence, and lumping ball into the box was not working. When their defence was coming out that was when we had more joy. As it proved with the goal and Fryatt's chance.

If anything I thought Holloway recognised this and the changes he made gave us the goal. i think this has been over looked.

Narborough Bod

Narborough Bod

Posted
Posted
They had 6 in defence, and lumping ball into the box was not working. When their defence was coming out that was when we had more joy. As it proved with the goal and Fryatt's chance.

If anything I thought Holloway recognised this and the changes he made gave us the goal. i think this has been over looked.

Fair enough, but also, on refernece to the first bit, I thought we did open them up a few times in the first half. But for badly timed runs we could have been through more than once. I didn't think there was the need to swap Campbell and Hayles at half time.

What was your thought on the Henderson move at the end?

Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted

Hendo 6-Flapped once and could have done better for the goal.

Stearman 7-Solid.

Kisnorbo 6-So-so.

Bruno 5.5- Not brilliant.

Clapham 7-Some of the best crossing of the match.

Hayles 6.5-Looked like he was trying.

Bell 6.5-Some good runs but his crosses were poor.

Oakley 5-Was he playing?

Hendrie 5- As above.

DJ 5-Bring back Hammond(ankle).

Howard 5-Was fouled a lot, but not at his best.

Hume 7-Took his goal well.

Fryatt 6.5-made things happen.

McAuley N/A

Cat Burger

Cat Burger

Posted
Posted
Clapham 7-Some of the best crossing of the match.

Yes, it would have been if we had this man playing:

r166703_619902.jpg

Oh yeah and providing he had a big jump and could head a ball.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...