Katy Posted 8 June 2005 Author Posted 8 June 2005 Maybe you have to be on aol to view it ill try and find another one
Bert Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Maybe you have to be on aol to view it ill try and find another one 120593[/snapback] Yeah you have to be on aol so i found out!
Frenzied Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Harry Kewell - shit at football and clearly a shit in general. Oh bugger, is that defamatory?
Katy Posted 8 June 2005 Author Posted 8 June 2005 Harry Kewell - shit at football and clearly a shit in general.Oh bugger, is that defamatory? 120601[/snapback] It will get thrown out of court - I dislike Kewell even more now!
Bert Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Try this one 120595[/snapback] Yay it works cheers love!! i heard about this months back but didn't think anything would come of it but it is a bit of a shocknow it looks like happpenin!!
Katy Posted 8 June 2005 Author Posted 8 June 2005 Try this one 120595[/snapback] Yay it works cheers love!! i heard about this months back but didn't think anything would come of it but it is a bit of a shocknow it looks like happpenin!! 120606[/snapback] Its ok love! Aol is quite clearly shit.
Alexikokopops Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Harry Kewell - shit at football and clearly a shit in general.Oh bugger, is that defamatory? 120601[/snapback] It will get thrown out of court - I dislike Kewell even more now! 120604[/snapback] What a nobber Kewell is!!
Katy Posted 8 June 2005 Author Posted 8 June 2005 All I will say is frig off Kewell. 120629[/snapback] Kewell is just jealous as he will never reach the Legendary heights of Sir Gary!
Random Burglar Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Thats a joke!!! No way he will win!! Isnt he paid enough for a shite footballer!!!????
Cat Burger Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 He thought the comments would discredit him?? I'm sorry but sueing someone for something as petty as that discredits you more you nob
davieG Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Attention seeker who can't make the back so has a tab at making the front page. Besides if it offending him so much why force it to be gurgitated by the public by bringing this case. I bet the agent helped a little, err 10% of any damages but no obligation to pay for the costs.
Louise Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 In my opinion there is very little chance of Kewell getting anything but court bills out of this as it's all a matter of Gary's opinion.
Frenzied Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 Lineker's opinion has to be 'fair comment' though and in the public interest. Does anyone have a link to to original story?
C-man Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 So if every time one of us shout abuse at a player we can be sued? IMO, Sir Gary is entitles to his opinion and he did nothing wrong. Bloody Kewell
Anish Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 So if every time one of us shout abuse at a player we can be sued?IMO, Sir Gary is entitles to his opinion and he did nothing wrong. Bloody Kewell 120846[/snapback] The written words and the spoken words are worlds apart I would like to know what Lineker said (a link to the original article, or even a brief comment about Lineker's article) would be quite helpful, and how it did offend Kewell? I don't wish to pass judgment before I know the facts but it would help if Kewell actually made reference to the 'offending' passage.
Frenzied Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 So if every time one of us shout abuse at a player we can be sued?IMO, Sir Gary is entitles to his opinion and he did nothing wrong. Bloody Kewell 120846[/snapback] The written words and the spoken words are worlds apart I would like to know what Lineker said (a link to the original article, or even a brief comment about Lineker's article) would be quite helpful, and how it did offend Kewell? I don't wish to pass judgment before I know the facts but it would help if Kewell actually made reference to the 'offending' passage. 120850[/snapback] Not strictly true. The laws covering defamation refer to both spoken (slander) and written/published (libel) words. However, it is much more difficult to prove slander. Also the defamation has be so that it could injure someones career or reputation. So if Lineker has said something that could potentially prevent Kewell from getting transfers to other clubs, for example, then he may well be in breach of the defamation laws. That is, if what he said was proved to be untrue ie not 'fair comment'.
SnoopyFox Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 http://www.myfootballnews.co.uk/news_jump....=8&story=207202
Guest Posted 8 June 2005 Posted 8 June 2005 "The allegations are serious and you will hear from him how much they hurt and affected him and how, after due consideration, he decided he could not let them pass and must try to get them withdrawn." How long has it taken him to reach this conclusion? I hope he's not been having sleepless nights over it!!
Alexikokopops Posted 9 June 2005 Posted 9 June 2005 "The allegations are serious and you will hear from him how much they hurt and affected him and how, after due consideration, he decided he could not let them pass and must try to get them withdrawn." How long has it taken him to reach this conclusion? I hope he's not been having sleepless nights over it!! 120962[/snapback] Might explain soem of his performances!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.