Ajax Treesdown Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 I would vote for Sylla, he has potential to do very well here. Eastwood and Laursen are good players though. Don't know much about Kisnorbo, so he is in Other category.
Durnerz Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Potentially I think Laursen However I'm expecting a lot of Sylla.
davieG Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 I would vote for Sylla, he has potential to do very well here.Eastwood and Laursen are good players though. Don't know much about Kisnorbo, so he is in Other category. 122461[/snapback] Well at least we've signed him unlike Trundle, Eastwood et al?
Ajax Treesdown Posted 12 June 2005 Author Posted 12 June 2005 stupid thread 122467[/snapback] stupid twat!
Babylon Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 stupid thread 122467[/snapback] stupid twat! 122470[/snapback] You don't have to start personal insults little boy. Why start a thread about the most impressive link for christs sake. We could be linked with someone worth a few million, but we all know we can't afford them. POINTLESS!
Who ate all the pies? Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Went for Laursen but I think Timms would be a good signing aswell. Still we'll probably not get either!
Raspeir Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 stupid thread 122467[/snapback] stupid twat! 122470[/snapback] You don't have to start personal insults little boy. Why start a thread about the most impressive link for christs sake. We could be linked with someone worth a few million, but we all know we can't afford them. POINTLESS! 122471[/snapback] At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! I went for Timm as I rated him pretty high in the few times i've seen him play though i dont know anything about the valadility of the link.. gotta say that Laursen doesnt look a particuarly bad prospect for a left-back either though..
shen Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Have we even been linked to Eastwood? other than on this board of course...
Who ate all the pies? Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that!I went for Timm as I rated him pretty high in the few times i've seen him play though i dont know anything about the valadility of the link.. gotta say that Laursen doesnt look a particuarly bad prospect for a left-back either though.. I agree with you on all accounts to be honest! Laursen would be 'worth a dabble' (god I hate that phrase) as he can play centre back aswell, and we need a centre back. He also fits into the utility catergory which Levein wants. Thinking about it Mads Timms can play midfield or up front can't he?! Anyway I'll get more excited once we've signed them, if we sign them!
Babylon Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! 122476[/snapback] a) How can you decide you don't like a thread if you don't read it? B) I didn't take part in the vote as it is pointless. c) There is already a sticky thread at the top of the page to dicuss players people want to see at the club. It is there to stop numerous pointless threads such as this one. http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=6288
Cat Burger Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Isn't Timm in Borstal?? Anyway I went for Laursen, he is in his prime and has a better reputation than Sylla and Douglas.
Mark Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 From what i've seen, and heard, Freddy Eastwood. He looked a class apart in the Playoff final and single handedly won that game for Southend. From the looks of it he is capable at a higher level but as always it's a risk, you could be a huge success like David Nugent or flop like Chris Greenacre. I think it's worth the risk if he's affordable.
Who ate all the pies? Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 I agree Eastwood would be worth the risk, unfortunately you've hit on the problem, I doubt we can afford him
Macca4lcfc Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 if you dont like the thread why dont you just not reply or click the big backspace button? People like you just piss the world off, Its a decent post, just a bit of fun. Although you probably wouldn't know about fun, cos' yo'ure too busy judging what posts are 'good' or 'stupid' At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! 122476[/snapback] a) How can you decide you don't like a thread if you don't read it? B) I didn't take part in the vote as it is pointless. c) There is already a sticky thread at the top of the page to dicuss players people want to see at the club. It is there to stop numerous pointless threads such as this one. http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=6288 122480[/snapback]
Babylon Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 if you dont like the thread why dont you just not reply or click the big backspace button? People like you just piss the world off, Its a decent post, just a bit of fun. Although you probably wouldn't know about fun, cos' yo'ure too busy judging what posts are 'good' or 'stupid' At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! 122476[/snapback] a) How can you decide you don't like a thread if you don't read it? B) I didn't take part in the vote as it is pointless. c) There is already a sticky thread at the top of the page to dicuss players people want to see at the club. It is there to stop numerous pointless threads such as this one. http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=6288 122480[/snapback] 122531[/snapback] If you don't like what I say just press the back button. Hypocrites like you piss the world off. It's just a bit of fun, you wouldn't know that though as you are too busy critisising other people opinions. Go back to attempting to be a footballer as your brain isn't up to much else. This place is about sharing opinions and in my opinion it is a completely ridiculous thread. If the post was about just the most impressive signing I wouldn't have a problem. Why the most impressive link? We have been linked with Paul Hartley, in my opinion he is one of the best players we have been linked with. But there is no bloody way we are going to sign him as we don't have the money. I heard a rumour we were after Paul Scholes... I think that's the best player we have been linked with.
Ajax Treesdown Posted 12 June 2005 Author Posted 12 June 2005 stupid thread 122467[/snapback] stupid twat! 122470[/snapback] You don't have to start personal insults little boy. Why start a thread about the most impressive link for christs sake. We could be linked with someone worth a few million, but we all know we can't afford them. POINTLESS! 122471[/snapback] At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! I went for Timm as I rated him pretty high in the few times i've seen him play though i dont know anything about the valadility of the link.. gotta say that Laursen doesnt look a particuarly bad prospect for a left-back either though.. 122476[/snapback] I thank you mate! Babylon is the little boy in this forum!!
Babylon Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 stupid thread 122467[/snapback] stupid twat! 122470[/snapback] You don't have to start personal insults little boy. Why start a thread about the most impressive link for christs sake. We could be linked with someone worth a few million, but we all know we can't afford them. POINTLESS! 122471[/snapback] At the risk of being beaten/burnt at the stake/tarred and feathered/told to 'pizzooof'... surely if you dont like the thread then simply dont read it/take part in the vote? i quite liked the idea as it opens debate as to what players people would like to see at the club.. and any supporter worth her/his ticket will have an opinion on that! I went for Timm as I rated him pretty high in the few times i've seen him play though i dont know anything about the valadility of the link.. gotta say that Laursen doesnt look a particuarly bad prospect for a left-back either though.. 122476[/snapback] I thank you mate! Babylon is the little boy in this forum!! 122613[/snapback] Funny that you ignored my post isn't it. Little boy ha, your a joke mate. You make pathetic pointless threads that little kids like you seem to enjoy. Then you revert to name calling because someone doesn't like your thread.
Alexikokopops Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Don't make me break out the handbags picture again...
MC Prussian Posted 12 June 2005 Posted 12 June 2005 Well, I for my part think this thread is unnecessary. Right now. How do you want to judge new signings or possible links when you haven't seen them play (together)? That's just too much in the mix. Feels to me like comparing apples to bananas... Or is somebody just plain bored? I do my first comment on the new squad once Craig Levein has them all in his pocket...
Ajax Treesdown Posted 13 June 2005 Author Posted 13 June 2005 Fine then, i'm going to sit in the corner and cry. Boo-hoo!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.