Lambert09 Posted 8 February 2012 Posted 8 February 2012 We have some cracking prospects coming through atm. If we never had the Thais I reckon our first team would have about 3 starting each week.
ramadaone Posted 9 February 2012 Posted 9 February 2012 and in that time he came fairly close to scoring and should of had an assist with his pass to Gally which he should of buried Agree 100% Hopper should be on the bench instead of Howard end of story Howard has had his day and at the end of the season will be off so why not give the yound lad a chance I've said it before and I'll say it again Hopper is better in the air than Howard all ready - so what else does Howard bring to the table ? This is not a pop at Howard as over the years he has been a great servant but time moves on
Babylon Posted 9 February 2012 Posted 9 February 2012 it was the clubs that decided to go 5 subs... we could have dismissed the idea. We did.
StanSP Posted 9 February 2012 Posted 9 February 2012 I heard 48 out of the 72 football clubs backed the idea.
m00nie Posted 9 February 2012 Posted 9 February 2012 We did. i thought we backed it but have just seen it was held at leicester so thats probably what i read and took it wrong.. I heard 48 out of the 72 football clubs backed the idea. 2/3rds in favour then, wonder if majority of those were the lower league clubs..
SMX11 Posted 9 February 2012 Posted 9 February 2012 I don't understand why they changed the subs rule, surely if you don't have enough he don't put them on you aren't forced to have 7 subs.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.