kingfox Posted 12 November 2012 Posted 12 November 2012 I always have the Leicester Mercury, and today I looked at our match report from Saturday then I like to look at the player ratings. As some of you may have seen if you have the Mercury, whoever is the b*****d who wrote it giving Whitbread a better rating than Schlupp, giving Whitbread a 7 the same as Morgan, Waghorn and Nugent, and also giving Knockaert a 7 when he was basically shit all game apart from his assist, needs to be sacked asap. Does anyone know who does them, because they always baffle me because they are always full of crap. P.S Also who is listening to the forum tonight, if so who was guy on about 10-15 mins ago, because my dad's mate said he is gonna phone in, but he usually talks utter bollocks. Thanks guys
bmt Posted 12 November 2012 Posted 12 November 2012 I thought Whitbread was solid and the penalty was a good challenge. Schlupp should be higher though, and knocky a bit lower.
Unabomber Posted 12 November 2012 Posted 12 November 2012 The ratings are awful each week, usually it is just 7's all round regardless of individual performances. Lazy stuff imo.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 12 November 2012 Posted 12 November 2012 The ratings are awful each week, usually it is just 7's all round regardless of individual performances. Lazy stuff imo. Aye. usually it's 9 7s and an 8 for the best player and 6 for the worst. Like you say, lazy.
Hirsty The Blue 94 Posted 12 November 2012 Posted 12 November 2012 Blame Jeremy Clay, that guys a dick.
UpTheLeagueFox Posted 13 November 2012 Posted 13 November 2012 I thought newspapers (quite rightly) gave up on player ratings years ago.
Mack Posted 13 November 2012 Posted 13 November 2012 I think the word you are looking for is diplomatic. Imagine they really slagged a player off, their access to the club would almost certainly be reduced.
davieG Posted 13 November 2012 Posted 13 November 2012 It's one person just like all the player ratings on here and how good and consistent are they? They surely can't be any worse than Blanderson's used to be?
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 13 November 2012 Posted 13 November 2012 It's one person just like all the player ratings on here and how good and consistent are they? They surely can't be any worse than Blanderson's used to be? your right there davieG, Bulls**t Anderson as i heard others call him was a joke of a reporter
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.