Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
broughtonblue

Tim sherwood

Recommended Posts

Guest Col city fan
Posted

He spent close to £100 million last summer and when he left they were 7th and had lost 5-0 against Liverpool and 6-0 against Man City.

He lost the dressing room at both Chelsea and Tottenham and it's no surprise both clubs did better when he left them.

Spot on as usual.

Close to 100 million on THAT squad.. unreal, literally indefensible

Posted

Spurs shouldn't have got rid of Harry Redknapp. His last season at Tottenham he guided them to 4th and only because of unusual circumstances they didn't get champions league football.

He left them with a group of exciting players who played good football, who were probably 2 or 3 players away from being realistic title challengers. They then get rid of him got in AVB who guided them to 5th sold their best player and wasted £100 million on average players. They are probably now a good few years away from being title challengers. If anything they have regressed since Harry Redknapp left.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Spurs shouldn't have got rid of Harry Redknapp. His last season at Tottenham he guided them to 4th and only because of unusual circumstances they didn't get champions league football.

He left them with a group of exciting players who played good football, who were probably 2 or 3 players away from being realistic title challengers. They then get rid of him got in AVB who guided them to 5th sold their best player and wasted £100 million on average players. They are probably now a good few years away from being title challengers. If anything they have regressed since Harry Redknapp left.

:thumbup:

Posted

Spurs shouldn't have got rid of Harry Redknapp. His last season at Tottenham he guided them to 4th and only because of unusual circumstances they didn't get champions league football.

He left them with a group of exciting players who played good football, who were probably 2 or 3 players away from being realistic title challengers. They then get rid of him got in AVB who guided them to 5th sold their best player and wasted £100 million on average players. They are probably now a good few years away from being title challengers. If anything they have regressed since Harry Redknapp left.

 

Both Redknapp and AVB could've saved their own jobs. Remember that Redknapp was clear in third place and fell away to fourth then Chelsea won the cup, Spurs should've had third wrapped up and no issue.

 

Same with AVB, was relatively comfortable in 4th then lost his way and ended up 5th.

Posted

AVB had the best win percentage as Spurs manager, agreed a total joke of an appointment :S. 

 

thought it was said TS had teh best win % ?? 

Guest MattP
Posted

He spent close to £100 million last summer and when he left they were 7th and had lost 5-0 against Liverpool and 6-0 against Man City.

He lost the dressing room at both Chelsea and Tottenham and it's no surprise both clubs did better when he left them.

Baldini signed all the players to be fair.

Guest MattP
Posted

Spurs shouldn't have got rid of Harry Redknapp. His last season at Tottenham he guided them to 4th and only because of unusual circumstances they didn't get champions league football.

He left them with a group of exciting players who played good football, who were probably 2 or 3 players away from being realistic title challengers. They then get rid of him got in AVB who guided them to 5th sold their best player and wasted £100 million on average players. They are probably now a good few years away from being title challengers. If anything they have regressed since Harry Redknapp left.

As with most, Harry was dismissed due to the financial state of the club.

Will the bills they had under him Champions League football had to be achieved.

Posted

As with most, Harry was dismissed due to the financial state of the club.

Will the bills they had under him Champions League football had to be achieved.

But he managed them to a champions league position. It's only because of what happened with Chelsea that they didn't get Champions league football.

I don't know what the finances were like when Arry was there but I'm sure as a club they were in a better state when he left than they are now.

Guest MattP
Posted

But he managed them to a champions league position. It's only because of what happened with Chelsea that they didn't get Champions league football.

I don't know what the finances were like when Arry was there but I'm sure as a club they were in a better state when he left than they are now.

He was unlucky and he wasn't.

They were in the title race in February and went on a terrible run to finish fourth. They shouldn't have been in the position to get done over by Chelsea.

A lot of Spurs fans think he underachieved with that side in hindsight, he had the best defence around and Bale and Modric pulling the strings in midfield. It's a mystery how they managed to finish below Arsenal that season.

Posted

The issue here seems to be the reputation of AVB when coming in to Chelsea. He was the new Pep, the new Fergie, the new Mourinho etc and quite clearly this was wide of the mark. I don't think anyone really knows if he's a really good manager or not yet, he hasn't been given time at any club, but if you believe what you read then he was sacked both times for other, valid reasons.

 

He's sh*t imo, but could be proved wrong down the road.

Posted

Oddly enough, I reckon Sherwood would do a decent job in Spain or Italy with his managerial style (and teams style of play). He'd never leave England tho.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...