Chrysalis

Given phase one seems to be a decade job, phase one should have been 48k, and then a decade later if we hitting 48k, at least 60k or so.

It will be more then that as corporate capacity will be a factor and no doubt its % of capacity will go up more proportionally, and a bigger active fan base means more merchandise sales etc. Every game is already televised, and we wont be in the EPL every season with its huge TV money but still be subject to PSR. Remember when we couldnt given Enzo his January signing. That showed every little helps.

You called it horseshit then went on to prove it isnt random as I said, ok boss. Also sorry if I dont remember every single reply given to me on this forum. I dont have super human memory.

You do seem in fairy tale land, we are a newly promoted club, time doesnt stand still, our target is 17th no question. You also say he isnt up to the job yet we are doing the best out of the three promoted clubs.

Keeps happening, fixtures are from from random. Notice how Man City is the adjacent fixture as well, keeps happening also.

The palace game was like under Morgan, where the team were timid. and just had no ambition. If I watch this game will it be any better than the Palace performance?

Why is there a world cup during the season, the womens off season was really long.

Its interesting, someone like Liverpool moan and rules get changed, but when its not one of tbe big boys its a fine, or warning.

Top enjoys paying the interest and this is for funding the club to pay day to day bills.

What was progressive about it and what is good about been stubborn to one way of playing without having a squad built for it?

You used this pic in your last video, seen it haha.

Massively better goal difference as well.

People digging up for anything they can find to support their argument at this point, it will get more and more desperate as we keep ahead of the bottom 3.

I will take your word for it as didnt watch those games. I hope this palace performance isnt going to be a trend moving forward.

Why do you want us to play in one set way though? Thats the main reason Southampton are struggling, their manager is an idiot obsessed with possession football. Possession obsession is what got us relegated with the most expensive relegated squad ever. Enzo football also was 90% bore fest, we had a few good games. I dont know how people found it entertaining otherwise, and a lot of the good fast counter moments he disowned publically. He likely has the hand brake on for good reason. Whatever he is doing is currently working as we havent been in the bottom 3 yet. Hoping Russell doesnt get sacked as I can see Top going for him if he does.

This is what happens when a sport is governed by its participants instead of independent rule makers, and the laws of the country are not taken into account. All they need to do is a fixed spending limit equal for each club, but the league just keeps resisting, its desperate to lock in advantages to the status quo.

The family wont put the money in, I love how we keep pretending FFP is holding them back. Also if Saints sack Russell I can see him being daft and replacing cooper with him.

Awful, seem to have gone backwards massively since Kirk, would think we were the newly promoted team from that performance, we seemed unfit, not motivated, they closed us down effectively, we left open spaces, what a mess.

I think the commercial management has been a disaster for the women's team, what is more important to the club, bums on seats or revenue? All men's game ST holders should have free access to all women's games, and the prices should be no more than a few quid at the most. Also use the games to add points for members so they can get tickets easier for men's games.

Link?

Enzo was playing a team who were favourites to go up and had the most talent in the division, its a lot easier to commit bodies forward in that situation. We also often were so lumbered in getting the ball forward its easier to have forward players already up there in that situation. The few fast counters I remembered were usually 3 forward players.

The data that matters is results and the league table. I seem to remember being outplayed a lot in a season we won the biggest prize in English football.

I brought it up because of some nonsense about progress 7 games into a reign. Which is it you want to discuss?

I knew the fickle fans would be blaming cooper for poor management of the club. I am tempted to post a poll of 3 choices but I expect will be taken down. Vote - 3 options. Which do you prefer. A - Tippy tappy build up play, it looks elite and tactical boss, dont care if we lose 3+ nil every week, just want us to look good. B - Pragmatic fights for points and stay up, lots of backs to the wall to get there with the misbalanced squad. C - Neither of these two options I have unrealistic expectations.

Cant be compared to Rodgers, this is the start of Cooper's reign and the previous season under a different manager was in a much weaker league. The last time we were in the EPL, after 7 games we had 1 point with a -9 goal difference, a team where we still had barnes and maddison. So thats not progress then? It really does read like you want to see some fancy long passing build up play which makes you think its more tactical or something. Ironically saints fans are begging for a pragmatic manager right now, careful what you wish for.