Chrysalis

3-3 !!

Ipswich players given freedom to shoot on sight and really pays of for them.

This league is brilliant, what a goal "again".

2-2 !!

How was that not 2-2

What a goal.

For sure, more teams play more direct, so less tippy tappy, and no VAR as well.

I want Ipswich to win this one, I would like us, Norwich and Ipswich to go up, 1-1 Hull just scored.

Max punishment is realistically 8 points, if the claims are true and KP are not scared of spending, just ignore the rules, but this has to be all in. Build a squad so good alongside a suitable manager and the 8 points will be just a cost of doing business. If they would only spend a little over the limits, then comply as the rules are written whilst also continuing the legal action to get the game in a fairer state. Personally as an example I think selling KDH would make us a worse team, we would struggle to replace him with the money never mind buy multiple players alongside the replacement. In the case of compliance I would rather go down keeping the squad together, than bringing in some replacements who wont be up to the job anyway.

The EPL ironically doesnt need their agreement, as a vote of 14 does it, I expect there is all sorts of threats thrown across the room to prevent the other 14 voting it in, a bit like how they avoided punishment for the ESL. EFL of course also doesnt need the big 6 agreement, but the big 6 of course will be threatening to pull the solidarity payments. As you said there is many other alternatives, but the problem is FFP is a tool currently used to lock in the status quo under the guise of keeping football clubs safe.

Put it into player contracts, wages depend on the seasonal spending limits. A bit like relegation clauses. Bear in mind this would be a starting point, the end game would be a consistent low spending limit, but that would never get voted in from the off. Other sports as I have said before have fixed spending limits, having it based on turnover is not just unfair, but also weird. Also its based on tv income mostly, so it wont vary as much as you think. The rule will also encourage more equal spread of TV monies, as then the clubs having more TV income means the big clubs can spend more. I just honestly dont get it, how so many fans think basing on income is way to go.

Watched the Southampton game, they look so uncomfortable with the passing they being asked to do. Manager squad mismatch.

We not going to do better than FBS I think. Unless KP quadruple what they paid last we were in the EPL.

Doesnt it work the other way round that the CEO has to "let" the football side breach the rules?

I just dont want us to sell KDH, keep Fatawa also. Even if it means we come back down as a result of not strengthening so be it.

BBC version of the story. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cpeg7jq4xg7o

Norwich for sure, then only 2 relegation spots.

Finally some sense. Although nothing suggesting it will replace PSR, but its a step towards same limit for all clubs.

33% pos wins 5-0 over 66% pos. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/live/cv2dqg456n8t#MatchStats

When you think your own ideology and strategy is a mastermind, you need something else to blame, players are an easy target.

Do it the moment our status changes before any impeding embargo. Rudkin needs to work the fastest he has ever done.

Surreal experience, finally watch one of our great games this season. Felt Southampton was one of our easiest games, as they play possession, lots of passing back which allowed us to recover shape, tippy tappy etc. so easy to play against.

Of course, I only was aware when read on foxestalk and friend told me on whatsapp. I also turned off near end as the sky leeds love in was ridiculous.

Wow WSL level of dodgyness.