Chrysalis

Also claiming mitigating circumstances after buying Winks, Canon, Coady, and the loan players I think wont go down well.

Those loans were just stupid full stop, how does a club owned by a billionaire have enough cash flow issues to need to borrow from a commercial bank at commercial rates, what on earth has happened there.

If its not really a point then dont bring it up, simples.

Sadly we left speculating due to all the silence from the club. I guess they think with no statements, its a case of speculation is the worst it gets for them.

This same article states she is still involved in the financial side of whats going on including player transfers, and a lot of our problems are "financial". I think there will be "someone" above Rudkin regardless of the exact delegation of duties. I think you have misinterpreted what football decisions mean, it means things like picking the manager and the players, it doesnt mean not being involved in footballing related finances.

Not forgotten but I think there is clear differences, that was temporary on the way to higher riches, whilst the most recent breach is after we already got there and topped out our income. The 2013 example was also done with clear purpose, whilst whats happened now is a bit odd, in that if we do fail (yes its not confirmed yet) we did so whilst crippling ourselves that final summer. I think Vichai wouldnt have let that situation come about in the first place, but if it was there, he either would have stuck two fingers up at it, or made sure we didnt break it, not a weird middle ground. Trying to comply when you have already failed is probably going to be pointless.

Edited for you, as you seemed to be a bit picky on what she has overseen.

There does seem to be a disproportionate amount of blame being placed at Rudkin's door. I am ok accepting he oversee's the scouting setup, choice of player recruitment, maybe has a say on manager recruitment, But there is no way he is charge of player budget, financing, that sort of thing, there will be someone above him making those sort of decisions, whether its top, his brother, whelan or someone else. Also whelan supposedly not involved in football decisions, deciding how much money is available in a budget for things like transfers and wages is not a footballing deicision, its a financing decision, a footballing decision is things like whether to sack/hire a manager, sign players and so forth. It would be unusual for her as CEO to at the very least not be overseeing rudkin's department. I think the style of play desired by the club is something coming from top himself, I suspect it possibly goes further from the choice of manager to even being imposed on managers, I felt was odd the temporary managers last season started with a different style then suddenly changed afterwards. Would also explain why rodgers had a tendency to suddenly switch back after we ended a bad run of games.

That does seem overly restrictive on the club, if what you say is true then it adds a new tint to it.

Which is relevant to my post how? You gone from saying people are having a meltdown due to being concerned, and justifying that because we we have won some things, totally unrelated. Maybe what you meant is if it happens its all ok in your eyes because of past good times, then you should have said that in the first place.

Please tell me he is back next game.

They would insist any spending cap to be linked to revenue only, as they are pretty much assured a revenue advantage.

Is everything premature, until its umm happened? Relegation fears for last season, blowing CL twice, failing to get a fax sent and more.

I proposed same idea, but I keep being shot down for it, the main issue though is the big 6 would never agree to it, as they want FFP to protect their status quo. Same with the big EU clubs as well RM, Barca etc.

Yeah but its not that much extra footage, as he said there is the introduction at the start, and then much of that extra time is used on extra replays, so I do agree with lazy editing. I would like to see more of the non goal mouth action, more build up, more of what goes on in between the shots. But instead is a million replays of a few bits of goal mouth action.

In addition Foxes Trust are put under NDA as well.

We have done a Man City, found a technicality which will prevent them from proving we in breach of the rules. This is only a delay though as we will be found out later. If we was on track to be within the rules we would have complied.

Did Enzo provide a reason why we backed off so early in the game? That interview, no challenging questions. As if its pre scripted.

We played for about another 5-10 mins after we scored then that was it, very bizarre game. In the second half it was backs to the wall. How some think we would be an ok outfit in the EPL is beyond me. Even the LCFC TV guys couldnt hide their thought son what they were seeing. They thought it was a confidence issue why the team stopped playing.

Neutrals have them down as been quality tonight and another great comeback for them, they are definitely the story of the season.

We started on fire, though could win 4-0, but after we scored it was holding on for most of the rest of the game. What happened to Enzo having control of games, that was very nervy to watch, just couldnt get out at all in the second half and couldnt even keep it forward for the last minute after we gained possession.

Add some rocket boosters if still injured to his boots and its lift off to him and the team.

ndldi, just for the OP.

Athletico came in a season early for Soyuncu we turned it down, even though the manager didnt want to play him, I assume it was the usual "doesnt meet our valuation".

That was for cashflow not FFP, we have both FFP and cashflow issues.