Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Fee isn't his fault.
Feel like there is a bit of a witch hunt going on.
Thought he was OK yesterday in a pretty poor overall team performance.
Has a clean slate for me under Marti, let's see how he get on this season.
To play devil advocate the revenue a club makes on actually selling a shirt to fans is peanuts compared to what you get from the actually sponsor.
Clubs only get between 20-5% of the money generated from shirt sales.
The most important part of a shirt from a financial point of view is the sponsorship element.
Pretty sure that being happening at the club for a while, it was nothing new. Maybe it was something that was discussed when he signed and something was agreed?
Which probably take you out of the market for a lot of players, we had players comutting from as far a way as Manchester when we won the PL and FA Cup.
So why?
I'm not sure how much you are being paid is relevant.
So did we see a increase in performance when RVN brought this in from other players.
So that makes a difference but have a new born doesn't? I can understand why someone would want to be a home under those circumstances.
I'm not saying Winks was right or RVN was wrong, but one incident doesn't make you a bad egg.
I think it's very easy to make a judgement on snips of information. My observation would be he's attitude seem fine under Enzo and Cooper, which suggests there was more at play with RVN.
I'd agree he a very good championship player and probably a OK player in a PL team which can cover for his weakness which is physicality.
To honests that's not a massive rush for any of our players.
Some don't give a crap about playing games.
You come to me going I want me gone, I'm going to make you pay though the nose to get rid of me, that's exactly what there agents will do.
They go, but on there terms, you will not save a penny on wages.