st albans fox

Call me old fashioned but I don’t think it’s nonsense (and I’m not a labour voter) lord Ali has campaigned for years to get a labour PM. Why shouldn’t he want them to look a million dollars on the world stage now that they’re there. Look at the flak Boris used to get for not having a decent haircut ! the papers would have had a field day if the starmers hadn’t looked good. Lord Ali has many business interests - I’m sure he will get plenty of access to the govt with him already being in the House of Lords.

They’ll just say that they do the wide angle shows the green line drawn from Justin’s foot the close angle shows that same green line relative to mateta at the same frame time - clearly onside whose going to present actual evidence to say that’s not correct ?? Only PGMOL can do that and they aren’t going to !

They won’t acknowledge anything on this one they’ve already tweeted the evidence and they’ll stick with that dermot will be on ssn in the morning to say that it looks iffy but the tech is sound. That it’s an optical illusion. The two scousers will say that they’re amazed it’s onside but we have to accept the tech is correct because we don’t have any angle that shows it isn’t

On the flip side at least that means wolves are losing

for some it’s definitely this but he isn’t helping himself - if his starting line up is ok then his changes are poor and vice versa

They just don’t the furthest point forward on mateta You could argue that they can’t know where that is without a better angle - but surely they can mark knee, head, shoulder in turn and see what that delivers on the lines I’ve no idea how they gave the decision yesterday - it could be that they marked JJ’s foot and then superimposed the green line across the pitch. They then looked at the other angle close up on mateta with that green line position taken across on the same frame to that image. The judgment being that mateta wasn’t close to it. Looked a bit weird and if they’ve got the freeze point wrong then everything else is potentially wrong

Context ? a few dresses against a few billions

Arsenal body language is to keep it tight for 70 mins and maybe try and nick it late with sterling or Jesus off the bench ?

Another probable scam where value is created by linked accounts doing inflated deals in the hope that someone will be drawn into paying an outrageous amount for a common item thinking they are getting a great deal.

Apparently this is the third time in the last seven games at Selhurst where we’ve gone from 2-0 to 2-2

Thee does look to be some fish in the background…..

Disappointed that should have been a full on fight in a n london derby Dave mackay would be turning in his grave

The lack of an angle should make no difference to the tech The var is supposed to freeze the frame as the ball is played ( he got this wrong imo) and then just marks the furthest point forward on mateta’s body and back on Justin’s the tech does the rest what we haven’t seen is where mateta’s body has been marked. The incorrect freeze frame also extended the point backwards where JJ’s foot is .

Bouba would have actually been a better option to play that role hamza made no sense unless you were pulling him into a line of three defensive midfielders (which he didnt)

Someone needs to tell ange that bentancur isn’t ngolo !

Am I the only person seeing clothing adverts pop up on Facebook which are for the same item but under different trading names (generally with ‘London’ in the title) clearly these must be a scam of some kind - it’s not difficult to spot the same photo on each different advert. Facebook systems must be able to see this ? Only assumption is that they don’t care cos they’re earning money surely this is where trading standards should become involved via govt legislation ?

Palace were really good there - pulled us all over the place Mateta dragged wout wide and then VK has to come across to cover for okoli v eze which leaves the right side open faes did brilliantly to get across to cover the shot You need some help from your midfield/wide men to try and plug some gaps

Surely that’s a fake - you’d never put white wine with a feline dish ……

Enzo saw that he was a huge advantage higher up the pitch in forcing turnovers which meant our wingers got possession before the defence could double up on them. With him and KDH as 8’s we had pressing machines in the opposition half. I understand why cooper is picking him - at the. very least he offers security aerial defending set plays. My issue is that in the PL, you really need to make the most of those turnovers and he’s technically not good enough. (With consistency). His assists yesterday were first class - especially for mavs where most players would have attempted to score. I wasn’t one of those who couldn’t see how good he would be in enzo’s system this time last year. I’m hoping that he can do the same this season but at this level I think coupler should be finding a system where the three midfielders he clearly prefers can play and also space for one of facundo/el kanous behind a striker. That may mean the wingers don’t play.

The semi automated tech doesn’t arrive till sometime in November…. but don’t hold your breath because the point that the ball is kicked is still going to be determined by a freeze frame decided by a var. adidas hold the patent to the chip in the ball that shows exactly when the ball was kicked. so we’ll get a 3 D image of the scenario as per the euros but it will take longer cos a bloke still has to work out when the ball was struck - and that can be wring as we saw yesterday where the freeze was a frame too late. (Making JJ’s leg more outstretched)

They played exactly as cooper has against spurs and villa defend till the last thirty and then bring some attackers on they defended better than we have so were 0-0 at that point

Semi automated As I understand it, most will be disappointed

The tech doesn’t need a side on view

There isn’t one

That freeze frame isn’t the same as the var. JJ’s leg is more outstretched on the var one. (Which looks a frame too late imo)