st albans fox

If the scorer goes down then it’s a red for ghehi and a pen for them as noted after a few minutes, we aren’t any better than previous games

Southgate has to make some subs to avoid a second yellow ted card for a few of them !

Nothing is any different no crispness in the passing not enough movement off the ball not brave enough

So proud of our country!

30m quid for Kiernan’s brother rudkin masterclass!

Surprised it’s that low ! I guess kids that age don’t sign for longer ??

Could argue the opposite if we’re trying to avoid an EFL breach then we’re worried about being in the EFL but clearly we’re not just going to wave wave flag

There’s no option for ‘spoiled paper’ or ‘not voting’

Is that definitive is there precedent ? company accounts can have amendments made post end date but that’s usually where events actually happened pre date but weren’t identified until post date.

And then you see newcastle have got 33m for minteh - unproven 19 y o clearly a good deal coming down the tracks for brighton from newcastle

At least she explains it clearly - unlike people like dermot Gallagher and the tnt ex ref it’s not her fault that the laws and use of var are crap

Possible they have a buy back at £50m ?

English ref getting sawn off by atwell …….. again

correct but when we have it this autumn in the prem, it will not be with the microchip in the ball because that’s adidas patent. The var will still freeze the frame You can’t stop - one of your legs must be moving at all times - however slow doesn’t matter

You see plenty of defenders challenge with their arms behind their backs the old toe nail offside call for denmarks goal

couldn’t see why he needed to swing with a run a ball needed looks like a tight ending

the selling club usually does the deal on their terms the shambles at our club means we have to sell the player on someone else’s terms !

These clubs have been doing deals in the same week - even one day apart ! they’ve also been questionable under ‘fair value’ if done sensibly it’s less obvious I mean we could have sold a player 14 June and bought one tomorrow. That’s a couple weeks apart and less likely to raise eyebrows the rules need addressing

Simply not putting one cross/clear mark inside one box spoils your paper Officially you have to mark a cross in a single box but if it’s obvious to the returning officer that you are voting for someone then they will likely count your vote (ie if you tick a box). Otherwise it’s counted as spoiled last time I wrote against each candidate why I couldnt vote for them 😀 made me feel better !

I may have to do the same as 2019 and spoil my paper

Occurs to me that there is an even simpler solution two clubs with ffp issues decide on a player in the other club that they would swap over for next season. Each club sells the player to the other buying club has to allocate 20% of the fee into year 1 psr selling club receives all the income in year 1 psr twelve months later the same deal happens in the opposite direction. Player not happy so wants to go back is the excuse - there is a buyback clause in place. It becomes like a psr loan where the benefit is all up front and the cost spread over five seasons the deals don’t have to be excessive away from fair market value how can they be challenged ?? Have I missed something ??

Nothing in life is free ! 😄 I understand where you’re coming from

He’s not an economist he’s a simple populist with little depth he will generally do ‘well’

Wouldn’t be 15m on the books because we’d still owe 12m would be 3m so the loan effective costs 3m benefits them across the next five years though

And there are existing rules around fair market value with transactions between multi owned clubs