Twitcher

Strange. Don't you support Leicester then? 🤷

Leatherhead 😬 Living in Leeds, I'd love us to get Guiseley away.

That's the line-up. So why not yesterday?

Someone who hasn't failed in a previous role as a starting line in the sand. RM is the new Steve Bruce, and there's been plenty over the years. It's one of the only jobs where you can completely fail, and another club says when can you start? How about someone who hasn't failed, even if relatively raw.

I think they need to be kept for a while in a lower league with no prospect of promotion. Otherwise, it hands them a couple more trophies, (say League 1 and Championship) as you say, at the expense of another team being able to enjoy that. If we were lucky enough to be in that position with the chance to win a trophy, and they nicked it from us, I'd be annoyed. My grandson wasn't born when we won the league and is too young to remember the cup win. The one good thing of where we are now is he might see us lift a trophy. Man. City taking it from us 🤔 nah.

How's this thing work? Are we out now?

Ye, those making jokes about alopecia need to have a word with themselves. My young granddaughter suffers from it, and it's heartbraking. No need.

I think Chelsea have got off lightly, notwithstanding the admission. You commit murder, but then pop in to your local police station and admit it. Ye, new owners, but Chelsea's an entity. I also wonder how many other clubs are thinking that goodness we weren't hacked, and there but for the grace of God.

So you think the scale prevents the punishment being announced at the same time? I don't really see why the punishment couldn't have been announced.

A couple of questions:- Did we commit the same breach as City under psr, i.e. our ratio of income from the club wasn't enough to run the club in relation to outgoings, so the owner added income from his own pocket? And, why with every other judgment, I can remrmber, the outcome and punishment were announced in tandem, but with City, it's just the outcome? Is it because in every other one, guilt was pleaded? I just think with how this has been done, it opens the door to X2 appeals; one for the outcome, and then another for the punishment.

Based on what's been said, (probably not by Man.City) is it unusual that they are appealing the decision, rather than the sanctions? In most other scenarios, (e.g. like ours) wasn't the decision accepted but the sanctions appealed? Is that because normally the decision and sanctions happen together? Could we end up with an even more protracted situation, with two appeals? City appeal the outcome. Let's assume that fails, and sanctions are placed on them. Do they then launch a second appeal in relation to the level of the sanctions?

What's happened to Macfarlane; injured?

He'll probably drift off to Hoffenheim, have a good career, and represent his national side on a regular basis.

Was he booed by our fans?

Is the away end sold out?