Guppys Love Child

For me it's the reason why we're actually in that particular situation that seriously boils my pi$$. The non existent accountability for the numerous fvck up's, ( is my biggest beef) be that poor acquisitions of players or managers, the stupid contracts, the allowing of players to run down the said lucrative contracts, the list of woe's whilst not endless is sadly quite long, and we keep on repeating the same mistakes and the circle continues. The financial pressure we are under at present IMO was avoidable to some degree, but only if we had had a more competent board running the show, and until the 'spoilt attention seeking man-child' grows up, takes look at the situation and asks " why are we in the sh1t?" like his father or an adult with two brain cell's would do, then takes some responsibility and does something about it, we will just stagnate or sadly get worse really quickly due to the drastically reduced revenue steming from relegation. For me the best option for the club is for him/KP to sell up and fook off ASAP. Hopefully the new owners will install a competent board to run the club but this time responsibly... yes I appreciate there is a risk when adopting a change like this, but it's pretty hard for it to get much worst.

TBH. I'd much rather have Soutter in with Okoli and Nelson. Faes - we've all said it all.before. just get rid ASAP. Vesty - yes, the championship suits him a bit better, but like Faes he's a tw@t and I Just don't rate him overall. Coady - Talks a great game, but is seriously overrated and IMO he can't back up all the BS that dribbles out of his chop's

I stand corrected with regards to Dyche's availability when Cooper was sacked, but the reason behind my post was more to quantify my belief that a half decent manager with better tactical awareness, team selections etc. but most importantly more experience would have done better then RvN and that it wasn't a foregone conclusion of our demise once Cooper was sacked. That was my real intention. My post was more about the better "attributes" needed and if we had actually found them in a manager, ( I suppose to back up my statment,) and how we could hypothetically have faired better, then suggesting a name of one. I think you may have taken my use of Dyches name a little but to literally here my friend.

Agreed. Also we get off to a half decent start post Cooper, with better a performances or two, and we gain a bit of momentum and you never know.. Yes it's "If's, But's and Maybe's" but we are a better team than we showed last season, and due to the continued incompetence of our board we never gave ourselves a chance.

Mmmmm. I'm not sure I agree with you there my friend. I think even a half decent, experienced manager, who unlike RvN actually understood team selections, tactics and in game management would have had a better points tally. I'm not implying we would have stayed up by the way, just that we would have stood a better chance of a bigger points tally. I've always maintained that the team was seriously underperforming with both Cooper and RvN in charge and were nowhere near getting the true potential out of the available squad. I agree that Coopers appointment did cause an horrendous amount of damage though. OK let's use a name being branded about at the moment and say we appointed Dyche once Cooper was sacked, would we have lost as many, looked as disjointed and devoid of an actual identity, with him in charge as we did with RvD in the dug out ? IMO No.. bearing in mind we were 13 points from safety, so 5 games ( let's say we realistically took them from the teams around us) out of the 17 we lost under RvN, maybe not such a lost cause as I thought. You also have to remember we weren't in the bottom 3 when Cooper was given his marching orders. I must point out I'm not a Dyche for LCFC Manager advocate, but hypothetically he was available at the time of RvN's appointment hence me using his name as an example.

Sorry, but RvN is just a cr@p manager. After watching his abhorrent attempt too manage us so far, he's just never shown me even a glimmer of hope that he has the skill set to be affective even at Championship level. I certainly wouldn’t trust him with a rebuild, and even with a step-down in quality I think we would be treated to much of the same sh1t as last season, with a similar results record.

Get some coffee down your neck kid 😀😃

Wind up, yes?

I'm glad it's not just me then.

Spot on. Totally agree with your points, plus the fact he's also an lying, egotistical, backstabbing, narcissistic, selfish little troll, and therefore the reason why he will always be my most hated LCFC manager...Period. Peter Taylor is Mother Teresa re-incarnate compared to him for what he did to our club.

I used to go to these games quite regularly with my god children. Also it was a good way to see 1st team players coming back from injuries get some match time in their legs. Luckily the company I worked for at the time also had a hospitality box so I managed to get a few games in there. It was a blessing in the winter with a moaning 8 year old saying they're cold on the way into the ground. God I miss Filbert Street.....

I can see your point and understand your reasoning, but going safe with Dyche would hinder us mid to long term. To satisfy Dyches brand of footfball I have a hunch that any transfers into the club would be of a similar mold to Cooper. Uninspiring ' journeymen' looking for a last payday with next to no re-sell value who in turn are and not up to playing in the Premiership ant longer, and if by some 5000 -1 miracle they got us promoted playing Dycheball. We need someone who will promote the youth and get the best our of the players who do stay. Adapting to what we have and not trying to force sub standard players acquired to fit into a drab, and dated way of playing. Going Dycheball will only IMO add to our existing financial mess, sap what funds we do have on dross, and not give us the ability to make profits on players.

Wow, another 30+, injury prone with no resale value player incoming, what could possibly go wrong? Well at least Pereira will have someone to talk to in the Injury Suite at 'Spa de Seagrave' If this goes through then it just re-enforces the fact that this club is a weapons grade sh1t show, willing to spaff wages to a player who potentially will.have limited game time, but not £2.5m (according to sources) release clause for Rohl.

Who does - Carrick?

No he wouldn't. Martin is a arrogant, egotistical 'Rodger's wanna be,' who would bore us all to death with a possession at all costs style of football Whilst Carrick isn't on my wanted list he has non of the "wonderful qualities " of Martin listed above. He'd actually make us go forward at least, which is a plus.

Oh, you just had to say it didn't you. Lol Pls LCFC Board just fvcking act, come out and either back RvN or go get Rohl. The release clause is naff all compared to prospective player fee's we will spaff up the wall. I'd rather miss out on a mediocre defensive midfielder that we don't need and actually some youth instead, than miss out on Rohl.

No from me, I'm not a big fan of "Mr Charisma" Did you see how lifeless and boring England were under him.

Maybe not, but as I posted, he's flexible and unlike Enzo or a Dyche ridged to one system or set up.

I agree. It's a bit embarrassing really, as well highly disrespectful to Ruud. The longer it goes on with the media outlets all reporting 'The tw@ts in the LCFC Board have yet to sit down with Ruud to discuss what the fook is going on' the worse it will become. It just hi-lights how unprofessional they are, and it doesn't send out a good message to any prospective managers. But hey, its Leicester we are talking about....

Really? Polar opposite IMO. He, unlike Cooper and especially Ruud has tactical flexibility and adaptability. He likes a 5-4-1 formation, which can change to a 3-4-3 when in possession, emphasising wing-backs for width and fluidity. Rohl's teams also have a high press, aiming to force mistakes in midfield and win the ball back in central areas. So no pissing around with the ball in our 18yd area inviting pressure and waiting for the inevitable mistake. I don't think he's wedded to and stuck hell bend with a single main style, Cooper was and Dyche definitely is. At least we would hopefully see a bit of entertaining football on the pitch.

The players are here and paid to win matches, and IMO shouldn't have a say in the matter. If the remit of RvN staying is them "being happy" with him then we are doomed. Player power of this level, dictating decisions of this importance can't happen. Ever. Also, what makes you think we can actually clear out the non-committed players anyway, We seem to have failed hideously so far.. RvN was a brilliant player, but will never be a manager as long as he has a hole in his @rse.. we need shot ASAP.

It saddens me to say it but I agree 100% Brilliant when fit...but that's the problem. If we get 10 games out of him next season we would have done well.

God I hope not. Nothing will change, he lacks all the management qualities we need. The loss stats alone are enough to part ways with him. He lacks in tactical awareness, his team selections were (and no doubt will continue too be) shocking. His style of play is...well rubbish. His in game management was shockingly poor. OK he'll be afforded a bit of slack with us dropping down a league and the quality of the opposition we will.face, but even so he will IMO still be found wanting next season if he stays.

That my friend is spot on. The problem we have is its very hard to actually identify and implement something that will get a reaction and be effective. Match Boycotts and Sit In's will never happen, as, and this is our biggest problem, the fan base isn't pulling in the same direction. We have the KPFC brigade who don't see the problems smacking them in their faces, and the "well its a good day out" crew who if we loose or put in another sh1t performance aren't bothered. The plane message did start tongues wagging, but needed Sky (or any other large broadcaster) to actually show it, the same goes for banners in the ground, and if the club have "had a word" with Sky, the BBC etc. Its dead in the water. We are in a sorry state.....

100% agree. We are just a source of income, nothing more. They don't give a flying Fvck.