CornwallFox

Stick a bunch of windmills on it to gain from windy Scotland

Unbelievable we haven't given anybody from the youth set up a go up top. I'm 90% sure I could do a better job that Ayew or Daka, let alone an actual footballer.

So is it a good thing or bad thing? Too much sounds bad. Being paid to use electricity doesn't. Telegraph can't decide which way to attack so tries everything at once.

Bring back the foxy ladies to use the t-shirt cannons

The "light shows" are awful anyway. It's like a family all having switches to different rooms of a house just turning them on and off. When the first one arrived I expected lasers and coloured lights and drones. No, just the normal lights flickering on and off.

Rules and regs around large public events is getting ever tighter so I wouldn't just look at the club for this.

Unfortunately we're on the same path with a personality cult and compliant media pursuing a narrative that undermines democracy

No words necessary.

Just be glad you didn't read he'd two-fingered the pope.

Every election and every single poll showing older voters are voting for the parties that support oil drilling and argue against net zero - Tories and reform. You can't seriously be pretending you don't know that.

They need Burnham. But starmar made sure that ship's sailed

I know it's not all of you para, think I alluded to that later. But unfortunately it is the rest of the older generation keeping climate denialism as tenable election strategy.

Looking forward to seeing the orange idiot losing his shit on truth social later

I realise not all boomers/older people have the same view. It's just unfortunate that it is that section of society essentially keeping the anti-climate brigade in business. If only the youngest generations voted at the same levels it wouldn't matter, but unfortunately they don't, so it does. I was reading the other day that Norway sells around 97% electric cars now, admittedly I think through force of legislation, but it can be done. But Britain, as usual, outsources it's infrastructure to the private sector so we don't have enough chargers etc. Our state needs to be much more involved and leading on building infrastructure.

Jesus come on. She was the bloody CEO, of course she's a decent way responsible.

Essentially I think the last bit is it. The very wealthy oil billionaires are happy to f the world by paying for media underhandedness and political stagnation. But ordinary people allowing themselves to fall for the narrative that it's uneconomic, unachievable, or even not required, do so willingly. It's blindly obvious that the climate is changing. We all know it snows less than when we were kids. We all know summer temperatures are far higher. We all know the seasons seem messed up. We all know there's less dead insects on cars than 30 years ago. So there's no sensible reason why anybody would believe a non scientist over a scientist. Countries across Europe and the world are operating with much high levels of renewables than the UK. There are countries operating with next to zero fossil fuels. So it's clearly very possible. Yeah we still get nonsense about needing a practical plan as if it's some unachievable thing, as if sticking some relatively cheap and easy in install solar panels and wind farms up it's somehow more difficult than exploring and extracting fossil fuels from miles under a sea. As if Britain has loads of days when the sun doesn't rise (because it doesn't need to be sunny) or the wind doesn't blow off the coast of Scotland or wherever. It's disingenuous, unambitious nonsense by people that don't want to slightest change in how they live. Predictably led by the older generations. Well the reality they need to be awake to is that things are changing. Climatically. They're changing rapidly and if it isn't anyway too late even the elderly will see extreme results within their lifetimes.

Sorry, I accept that we are utter trash, the leadership have let us down, players have let us down, we are at a stupidly low ebb. But the whole point of supporting a football that isn't man utd or Liverpool is that it isn't easy. We've had amazing times. We should be angry at how we've fallen. But ashamed of our club because we've become rubbish? No. Sorry but no. That's the language of glory supporters.

Now apparently the green party are banning horse racing. All the right wing rags on it, jenrick and co tweeting about it. Is it a policy? No. A single tweet from 2018 is the sole rationale for the latest pile on. All just honest journalism though, I'm sure

Anybody got a way to watch this? Fancy an afternoon of misery

You could also mention it's just utter, utter nonsense. As proven by all the countries that don't use it. Such a blatantly transparently nonsense argument.

Why will we need gas? Our neighbours are showing us we really don't need gas. So why do people continue to say we're going to need it.... Based on what? The fact that fossil fuel investors in the British media keep telling us we need it? Clearly we don't. Also, has does this conversation fit with your thought that the greens would apparently destroy the economy with net zero policies?

My only real issue with this is Kemi Badenoch claiming the Tories have forced Labour down when it was the Tories that negotiated 95% of the deal. Really not a fan of dishonesty in media or politics.

The cost of energy here is all pegged to gas. Net zero has nothing to do with it. You can clearly see in your graph that we have the highest prices excluding taxation. Renewables are the cheapest form of energy. What we need to do is unpick the link between energy pricing and gas. Finland is shown as having the cheapest energy. In 2025, they were 42% renewables, 20% nuclear and 34% fossil fuel. Of the total, gas is 3% and coal 6.4%. In Sweden, in 2025 they were 99% low carbon energy. Nuclear is 27%, hydropower 41%, wind 23%. Oil is 0.1% and coal 0.3%. France was 97% low carbon Slovakia 86%. Denmark 86%. Portugal 70% Spain 79%. Britain had 0 coal used but gas fluctuated and at times could be up to 50% of the total. At other times renewables accounted for 60%. This is the reason our energy is costly. We need to go further and faster as getting away from expensive fossil fuels, and in particular gas. Fortunately, we have a government that are committed to doing this.

As I say, if it's policy or involves direct quotes from a leader then it's fair game to discuss and disagree over. Why do you think net zero would destroy the economy out of interest? There are huge economic opportunities through net zero.

I have zero faith in Glover to come up with any useful signings