Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

urban.spaceman

Member
  • Posts

    30,363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    316

Everything posted by urban.spaceman

  1. I asked ChatGPT and it said this: The potential impact of AI is complex and multifaceted, and its consequences largely depend on how it is developed, deployed, and regulated. AI can be used for both good and harmful purposes, and its ethical implications have been a subject of considerable debate. On the positive side, AI has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, including healthcare, education, transportation, and many others, by enhancing efficiency, productivity, and innovation. It can aid in the development of life-saving medical technologies, improve disaster response, and help in the conservation of natural resources. AI can also automate tedious and dangerous tasks, freeing up humans to focus on more creative and intellectually stimulating endeavors. Additionally, AI can facilitate data analysis, leading to insights that can help solve complex problems and inform decision-making processes. However, AI also poses potential risks and challenges. There are concerns about job displacement due to automation, the potential for biased decision-making in AI algorithms, and the misuse of AI for malicious purposes, such as the spread of misinformation, surveillance, and warfare. Moreover, the rapid advancement of AI technology has raised ethical dilemmas regarding privacy, security, and the potential loss of human control over AI systems. To ensure that AI is a force for good, it is crucial to prioritize the development of ethical guidelines and regulations that promote transparency, accountability, and fairness in AI systems. Collaborative efforts between policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders are essential to address the potential risks associated with AI and to foster its responsible and beneficial deployment. It is imperative to promote a holistic approach that prioritizes the well-being of society and emphasizes the ethical use of AI technology to maximize its positive impact while mitigating its potential risks.
  2. There really can’t be a more useless bunch of twats than these people. I honestly think they would genuinely prefer being in perpetual opposition than have to compromise on some things to be in power. They don’t have a single brain cell between them.
  3. The good thing about this is that if everything goes wrong and the club has to fold then we have something to fall back on.
  4. PR Nightmare Before Christmas.
  5. It’s amazing to watch in real time as thousands of people collectively lose their ****ing minds.
  6. I miss lockdown.
  7. He deserves it.
  8. That’s the spirit.
  9. I can feel a yellow card coming.
  10. Let’s talk about God instead.
  11. Quick, change the subject.
  12. I’ve never understood the point of the argument about a 10 point deduction in 2002/3. There were no such rules in place until after that season and even if there had been, we still would have been automatically promoted anyway. And the other elephant in the room is what caused our administration in the first place - the trigger was Eric Hall suing us on behalf of D*nn*s W*s* for wrongful dismissal after he broke another player’s jaw in his ****ing sleep, but other mitigating circumstances were the brand new stadium, high wages with a PL squad after a relegation. Which could have been coped with were it not for ITV Digital’s collapse which affected every single club outside the Premier League. That was literally out of our hands and not something that could have been helped. And again with EFLFFP - we have it on record from the EFL that we absolutely did absolutely nothing wrong. Nothing. We were fully vindicated. Man City were “acquitted” by a CAS judging panel of whom they were allowed to appoint 66%. And they weren’t deemed to have done nothing wrong, in fact the evidence that they broke the rules is extremely damning. But they were let off because the rule breaking was deemed by CAS to be “time barred” by 5 years according to a UEFA technicality. And guess what? Man City absolutely and completely refused to cooperate with UEFA for 5 years. Their chairman is literally on record saying he would rather spend £50m on lawyers to sue UEFA than pay a £30m fine. They used the exact same methods with the Premier League, who actually started their investigation into them in 2018. They bogged the PL down in so much litigation that the papers weren’t even allowed to report on the court case until late 2021. Even when they finally did bring the 115 charges another 2 years later, they only pertained to 2008-2018. There’s rumours that they’re still investigating the period from then to present day, which they absolutely should, because they are the biggest cheats in football and need to be held accountable. There is absolutely none, zero, zip, **** all, comparison with Manchester City abe our administration in 2002 or the 2014 EFL FFP accusations that we were fully acquitted of. None. Man City is a special case because they represent the authorities failure to hold them accountable but also their absolute fear of dealing with clubs with mega rich owners who couldn’t give a **** about the rules and have the means to thundergun their way through them. They missed their opportunity to stop Chelsea from doing it and we are going to see Newcastle do it from now on too. The PL/FA need to hand out the biggest punishment possible and take control of the league for once - expulsion from the league and a ban for 10 years with a 500 point fine would be nice.
  13. Saw a clip of that earlier and it’s the definition of a freak accident. The immediate reaction from the referee and players at the sheer amount of blood is harrowing. Just awful.
  14. A massive, massive part of my childhood. Gutted.
  15. If we hadn’t been denied our fair earnings and had our spending restricted for a decade, been denied fair entry to a lucrative competition twice because cheats were let off by a panel they were allowed to appoint 2/3rds of, or been relegated at the expense of a club that broke the same rules we adhered to - I would agree. Because you are right - we were absolutely shit last season. But you have to be 100% honest with yourself - we were never competing in a fair competition for the last decade. Not once. We were cheated. And I for one am ****ing sick of it. Which is why it’s so massive to see us continue with threats of legal action against Everton when they’re found guilty. We’ve all seen our club stand up for itself on the pitch but now we’re finally seeing us stand up for ourselves off the pitch too. I’m sick of being cheated.
  16. Just want to see these ****ers crying into their hovis.
  17. Chiseled.
  18. Dozy from Dozzell. Blatant red card. (Brilliant from Abdul )
  19. We were fully investigated by the EFL for 4 years and they have publicly vindicated us. Unequivocally. We didn’t do anything wrong. It should also be noted the *dozens* of clubs that have fallen foul of the EFL’s rules - for me, if that many clubs are finding themselves in in trouble with the authorities then there are clearly issues with the way the authorities are running the league. Just look at the difference in incomes between the Premier League and the EFL. The disparity, and the EFL’s rules, are designed to keep clubs like us down in the dirt while the big clubs cheat the league to their own benefit. We were shocking, yes, but there are reasons for that and you can take your pick from the denial of fair earnings after winning the league, the restriction on our ability to compete at the top, Man City’s Champions League ban being wrongly overturned and denying us a Champions League spot 2 seasons in a row, and Everton’s financial cheating over the last half a decade which kept them up at our expense last season. When the latter two are found guilty of cheating, we will be fully vindicated yet again. That, and we were shit.
  20. The money is out there, what isn’t out there is public understanding of the situation, mainly because the big clubs have such strength in numbers of plastic fans who don’t live anywhere near the club they’ve chosen and will defend their club’s cheating to the hilt because they have no understanding of their club’s wrongdoing, neither do they have any interest in changing a status quo that directly benefits their club. It was amusing to see their protests against the ESL but they’re happy with status quo which is just as corrupt. The way I see it, and I’m sorry to keep going on about it to you, but what fan groups like Foxes Trust should be doing is campaigning and raising awareness on the corruption in the league with the end goal being to remove the 3pm blackout and getting a fair and full deal for fans that doesn’t automatically benefit the “big” clubs. Start campaigning and informing fans that they’re paying 3X the price for Premier League football on TV than their global counterparts FOR HALF THE PRODUCT. Every single fan needs to know and understand that the only place in the world they have no legal right or means to watch every single English Premier League match is… England. You don’t even have to tell everyone what the endgame is. Just raise awareness and get people angry about the status quo and let it snowball. This is SO important for the sport we all love. It has quite literally been stolen by the wealthy and turned into a closed shop with fixed results. There’s a reason our title win shocked them so much, enough to manipulate the rules to punish us - it’s still impossible.
  21. Fully deserved. Great goal
  22. Last 5 basically. Clubs are allowed to lose £105m over 3 seasons, and over the last 5 they’ve lost £430m.
×
×
  • Create New...