Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

HankMarvin

Member
  • Posts

    15,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by HankMarvin

  1. The only reason he should be sold at this point is if we have a striker lined up. Can’t rely on Vardy and 1 goal in his last 22 Daka
  2. Nothing groundbreaking but at least the microscope is being aimed at rudkin, a bit tanner article athletic It was almost spontaneous. As the roar from the travelling Fulham fans started to fade after Emile Smith Rowe’s goal three minutes after the restart, the familiar chants began. “We want Rudkin out, say we want Rudkin out.” It has become a sporadic part of the chanting repertoire for some Leicester City supporters over the past three years as their club has gone from one that has challenged the elite of the Premier League to one that is just sinking in the quicksand to the Championship for the second time in three seasons. Jon Rudkin, the club’s director of football for the past 10 years, is seen as a key figure in that decline. The glory years of the Premier League title win in 2016, the Champions League, two more European campaigns and winning the FA Cup will never be forgotten, but they feel like a distant memory for the supporters who headed for the exits after Adama Traore drilled home the second goal to dampen Leicester’s fading survival hopes. Ruud van Nistelrooy’s side have lost seven consecutive league games for only the fourth time in their history. They have failed to score in four consecutive home league games for the first time since September 1983 (run of five) while they have drawn a blank in five of their nine Premier League games under Van Nistelrooy. They did so in just one of their first 13 matches of the season under Steve Cooper and caretaker Ben Dawson. With those numbers, it was not just Rudkin who was targeted by the chanting. There were chants for “Sack the board” and, when Van Nistelrooy took off the popular figure of Bilal El Khannoussjust four minutes before Traore’s strike, there was a chorus of boos and chants of: “You don’t know what you’re doing.” Van Nistelrooy’s side have lost seven league games in a row (Marc Atkins/Getty Images) Leicester have gone from being a model of how to compete with the top clubs to being characterised by poor decision-making and a lack of accountability. The supporters have every right to demand answers and action as they watch their club become a fading shadow of what it once was. Ten years ago, after a 1-0 home defeat to Stoke City, Leicester were bottom of the Premier League, three points from safety but three points better off than they are today. The managerial structure was generally as it is now, but there was one huge difference — the inspirational, much-mourned figure of Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha was at the helm. Back then, his son, Aiyawatt, worked closely at the club, reporting back to his father who looked over the King Power Empire from Thailand. He worked with Rudkin, who had just been promoted to director of football, while chief executive officer Susan Whelan managed the club’s general affairs. It was a winning formula at the time. Now, the gulf left by Khun Vichai’s tragic death in the 2018 helicopter crash has never seemed bigger. Khun Top has stepped into his father’s role to manage the entire King Power portfolio and has also started a family. Away from football, the family has also filed a £2.15billion fatal accident claimagainst the manufacturer of the helicopter in which his father died. An inquest into the deaths of the five people killed in the crash also began last week. Khun Top has much more on his plate than just Leicester, but he remains the chief decision-maker of its affairs. He needs more help. Rudkin is in charge of football affairs, although he delegates major decisions to Khun Top. But managing Leicester’s football matters has become a huge concern. Other clubs have appointed people to assist the director of football to manage the workload and speed up the decision-making, which has become too slow at Leicester. Recruitment has been a huge issue. It has become scattergun, with no clear vision. Rudkin, left, delegates the bigger decisions to Khun Top (Michael Regan/Getty Images) With five managers in the past three years, the ultimate decision on which players are brought in has been left to each of the individual managers. But with managers as diverse as Brendan Rodgers, Enzo Maresca, Steve Cooper and now Van Nistelrooy (Dean Smith did not get a transfer window), all have had different opinions on players, leading to no clearly defined philosophy on who is the right fit for the club. One check on signings has been profitability and sustainability rules (PSR). While no Premier League club has been charged with PSR breaches in the most recent assessment, Leicester remain in a legal battle with the Premier League over club losses incurred during the three-year accounting period ending in 2023-24. Instead of the club challenging a manager’s decision on a signing, it appears as though they have been given carte blanche. Jannik Vestergaard is a classic example. Wanted by Rodgers, and then unwanted, he was rewarded with a new three-year contract by Maresca, unused by Cooper, but is now back at the heart of Van Nistelrooy’s defence. Funds are precious with Leicester’s profit and sustainability concerns, but they tried to back Cooper last summer with an £80million gross spend. Only two of those signings started against Fulham — El Khannouss and Jordan Ayew. Caleb Okoli and Oliver Skipp were recruited for a combined total of £33million. They may prove to be sound investments, but right now they are squad players and for a challenge as great as remaining in the Premier League, Leicester needed players who can overwhelmingly improve the starting XI. The decision to use up one of Leicester’s two Premier League loan spots on striker Odsonne Edouard has been a disaster. He cannot even get into the matchday squad and would be extremely expensive to send back to Crystal Palace. They need reinforcements desperately in this January transfer window. With two weeks to go, only one has arrived: full-back Woyo Coulibaly, for £3million, from Parma. With PSR still potentially an issue, Leicester are struggling to do any other deals without generating more funds. Tom Cannon was recalled from his loan at Stoke City and Leicester are trying to sell him to generate funds to be reinvested. Several clubs have expressed an interest in taking Cannon on loan, and Van Nistelrooy has said Leicester are “looking in this window at his situation, what would be best for him and for the club”. But Leicester need to move much quicker. But to many, there appears to be a lethargy that is out of place with the club’s precarious predicament. Unlike in 2014-15, when Leicester signed Robert Huth on loan and Andrej Kramaric for £9million, there are no funds to play with. Leicester need to conjure up something special or Van Nistelrooy, who said funds and the January window were part of his negotiations with the club when he agreed to join, will be left to play the hand he has been dealt. He stressed publicly after the Fulham game nothing had changed. In 2015, Nigel Pearson decided to make changes in his approach and personnel. It paid off. Leicester survived and so began an incredible era in the club’s history. Ten years on, it feels very different. But changes are needed at Leicester City just as much if they are to survive.
  3. Heavily linked hadn’t played for 2 at the time, I was taking about the first time
  4. Looks like we dodged a bullet with 12m Zaha rumoured to be going to the MLS
  5. I’m sure a lot of teams want around 5 players this month
  6. He said it’s a good start when talking about the new RB
  7. Have they though, if you look individually who has improved? Possibly just Bilal, which was probably likely to happen with more game time irrespective of who the manager was. Yeah Ruud has stopped the 20 plus shots per game, but at the cost of being able to score goals.
  8. Thats not a huge surprise when you consider it’s a small sample size of 5 games which have all been defeats in arguably the strongest league of the 5. Using Post-Shot Expected Goals minus Goals Allowed Positive numbers suggest better luck or an above average ability to stop shots. In the Prem per 90 Jacub 34th/39 -1.8 Mads 4th/39 +0.37 if you Hide non-qualifiers less that 10 games for rate stats Mads is Top Stolarczyk has been thrown in the deep end, he definitely needs more experience before becoming our first choice should/when mads leave
  9. Having a gk that has a save percentage of 75% helps in the top 22 of the big 5 leagues. Ward has experience that didn’t help him
  10. Let’s in 50 percent of shots faced, given that is a relatively small sample size it’s only worse in one gk at 40% guess who
  11. No he didn’t
  12. Plenty of younger talent to be hovered up from champ, Palace seem to be doing a good job just adding the Millwall player to that list
  13. To think the amount of people that turned their nose up at Moyes
  14. Defender James Justin insisted Leicester fans are 'entitled' to boo after the side's losing streak extended to seven. He told the BBC: 'They pay their money to watch their club and we're not doing the club any good at the moment. 'They can boo if they want to be honest. They are entitled to do that. It doesn't help anything I don't think, but we're the ones getting them there at the minute so we need to do something to change that.'
  15. 2 wins 2 draws from 11 .73 per game
  16. I don’t I hope he leaves or is sacked there is nothing about us at the moment he doesn’t even have a coaching support network to really change things.
  17. Neither will less attendance on the gates, if results don’t improve
  18. RVN trying to get Vardy back he wants 12
  19. If you’re not scoring goals it’s kinda wishful thinking to think a different goalkeeper is going to repeatedly earn you points at 0-0. He only has a save percentage in the lower end of 60% Not to mention said goalkeeper only has one clean sheet.
  20. Agreed those teams were camped so deep in their half, with the our 2 central defenders and winks pinging passes back and fourth inviting pressure
  21. It’s not a great stat? But you rate a player with 4 points from 15 games. Makes sense
  22. Don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, but last time I checked the goalkeeper wasn’t scoring goals up the other end
  23. He isn’t really going to last to next season at this rate, fans will stop going to the matches. You can’t lose week on week score a goal every 5 hours and expect there not to be consequences. He either gets a 10th match to show something or is given the boot
  24. Shock horror, attacking player looks honking in team that loses 7 back to back and generally doesn’t create much
  25. 0.82 points per game Vs 0.44 points per game We are getting worse
×
×
  • Create New...