HankMarvin

Should double check prices on eBay first, might be a few collectables especially during O’Neil era (play offs league cup etc) might pay for a few bottles of red

He isn’t coming here A Leeds move for the midfielder could be in doubt, as he is being offered a frankly shocking £100,000 a week by MLS side Toronto FC, according to GiveMeSport 15.9m 3 year deal

Their wages were paid by their loan clubs, so they wasn’t on the wage bill

Re the earners since we last was in the champ. we have also added the likes Skipp, Ayew, Bilal, Okoli, De Reid, Couibally, Soumare, Kristasen, Plus Souter, Choudary, Nelson from loans last year. I think quite a few will have to go, the annual amount for losses is now 13m and to caveat the worst losses falling out of the 3 year cycle, so did 22m in allowances for that year. To comply with 83m it needed Barnes pure profit to be sold, and to allow us to bend the rules and still not submit a business plan to sell more pure profit in the shape of KDH at the end of that window. Although we did spend £35m that year, so I guess a lot will depend of if we have any intention of strengthening.

That’s a bit harsh, and unfair some have a great touch

sign him up

He is running at pace 6 foot odd plus, nearly on his ankles before he makes contact.

They made 60m profit in 23-24 the 3rd best in the league, and have average gates of 62000 Last season their net spend was 80m after bringing in 35m this season they have spent 50m after bringing in 55m So comfortably can afford 20/30m

Thought Boro were favourites and have a bit of cash to spend

It’s only taken the club to be on its arse, a possible embargo and a points deduction

just from your article the 3 bottom teams on the list, equates to more than 15m for example Swansea 5m West Brom 7.8m Wrexham 4.1m https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/championship/transfers/wettbewerb/GB2 On transfer market in euros Arrivals: 207 Transfer expenses: €131,946,000 Expenditures per club: €5,497,750 Expenditures per player: €637,420

Most of his game time has been in the Prem, where he was encouraged to punt it long. What was Mads stats last season? Edit just seen not a huge difference 56%pass 27% long ball

more like 120m

Last time we were in the championship Mads had the second lowest percentage of launched passes. Depends how the manager decides to play I guess

Great for a club with an endless pot of money, not such a great negotiating chip for a club with a lack of funds. If you are telling the selling club, you’re in the market for 5 more players it doesn’t exactly allow for much manoeuvrability with negotiation

I don’t think anyone can say he didn’t have a purple patch but he also had a shit patch and when you break down the numbers in 10 of the 15 games he started in, he failed to score. He is very fortunate if he ends up leading the line this year, due to our financial situation. If he does have to play and there is no alternative, I hope he scores and does well. But it won’t paper over the cracks that he has been a terrible signing for the money and wages he has earned. It’s his fourth season, and now with no Vardy in front on him, and under his 6th different manager there can be no excuses if he fails to deliver in the league below what he was signed for.

Trafford to Man City for 27m Burnley will need a new keeper and Newcastle on the look out

He started 15 games and scored 4 goals from open play, plus 3 penalties, for a team that spent most of the season at the top of the table. Breaking it down further, across those 15 matches, in which he averaged over 71 minutes per game — he scored from open play in just 4 games. This was in a league winning team averaging 2 goals per game. The stats, all things considered, were far from “impressive”. A goal return in 33% of the matches he started and 26.7% from open play.

Butland took to Instagram (23 July) to share his happiness with the result, writing: “It’s good to be back home.” Rangers-linked defender Coady liked the post, along with Vaclav Cerny, who starred last season on loan with the Gers.

Slimani and Silva have some good highlight reels, prior to moving here

Last time we spent £40m we brought in over double. Plus 2 of those sales were significantly pure profit. Plus PSR is reduced for the season.

“There are transfer priorities, though they will not be easy to realise, with Leicester targeting a striker, a left-sided midfielder and a No6, as well as a goalkeeper if Mads Hermansen departs”

I don’t think anyone compares him to Vardy again an excuse that rolled out just like how know one said it about Nacho, even Ayew has come in last year and got more goals from playing out wide. Kasey Mcateer had similar numbers playing out wide in the Championship in less minutes. Lots of excuses season after season. Vardy has left now, as that was one rolled out regularly saying that playing second fiddle to a legend must be hard. I’d rather see Evan’s used and grow in experience and technical ability than a bloke with the biggest blooper reel the club has ever produced.

For a start I was responding to someone that said it’s worse now. The point which you seem to be choosing to ignore, is just like if attention was brought to the situation above. it could’ve drastically changed what followed, we went on to get promoted won the league etc etc and the ironic thing is in the years that followed, our fans and general fans of football thought we had the best owners ownership model in football despite what went on in the past. Does success matter more than ethics? These reports were dismissed by many at the time. It’s not just a logo on a shirt. It’s Sleeve sponsors LED boards pitchside Stadium naming rights App partnerships Pop-up odds during broadcasts Official betting partners” offering match previews Ads before, during, and after every game Removing gambling from the front of the shirt is just symbolic it won’t change the business model. It’s like removing cigarette machines from pubs in the 90s, while leaving tobacco leaflets on every table. Last season, over 50% of Premier League clubs had some form of gambling sponsorship on the front of their shirts. This isn’t a side gig anymore — it’s embedded and provides inflated sponsorship deals. As I said given the choice of facing PSR issues or having zero funds, MY personal preference is that I don’t care what’s on the shirts. If you feel like that’s trampling over your thread, maybe set up a WhatsApp group and don’t have an open debate in a public forum.