Your argument for opposing this motion appears to be solely based on claim(s) that other Trusts don’t do it, which is a bit like shopping for a new car, only to buy a bicycle because your next door neighbour doesn’t drive. It’s daft, and the optics - at a critical juncture for the Trust as the AGM approaches - are rather bad to put it mildly.
You’re either not listening to, or not recognising, the critical need for reform. Which only makes the argument for reform ever stronger.