bmt

On the topic, I have only seen it once but 'Dr Strangelove' is ridiculously overrated.

In terms of impact on Covid, I agree it was a pretty unprecedented situation and nobody got it right. And to that end I think the recent inquest was pretty stupid in concentrating so much on what it did. But the bolded part of the quote holds and we should expect more. The actions of the tory Govt are so low that the most basic of expectations - not blatantly lying, not treating people like they are stupid, not making rules and immediately ignoring them themselves - are no longer expectations. I know I'm not disagreeing with you. And yes on the bear shitting in the woods, but they should still be called out for it (not the bear). Agree on the rest of your post.

I think our style would work really well in the prem, especially against the mid table teams.

Why would Leicester fans want to see you go to a Leicester game? We go ourselves

Gurkha New Delhi in Mountsorrel is the best nowadays (imo) by a mile.

Ipswich and Leeds both have horrible fixtures coming up. If Ipswich beat Leeds and we beat Ipswich we are going to be in a hell of a position.

I still don't think we should have conceded from this. Yes it's a mistake but think we defended the resulting position very poorly. I'd personally be happy to have him here longer if we go up, but think we should bed in better/younger players at the same time.

To be fair, last year's league one...

Leads to some great Daggers content to be fair so all for it.

Genuinely hope this is what stops them renewing their season tickets

How is that third goal not Ndidi?

How many of the last games do we have to extrapolate to the end of the season for Leeds to finish top?

If we win can someone go through and quote all the morons so we can laugh at them please

I live in South-East London and know a pub I am pretty confident will be playing this tonight. Pretty rough Millwall pub though and I have a pretty obvious Leicester accent. Not sure whether to go and watch or not!

Which then becomes a reason to further kill Palestinians which further entrenches feelings of injustice and hatred. This is why I so quickly used the word genocide. Israel knows killing people in Palestine isn't going to make young Palestinians less likely to become extremists. For me the escalation of this looks less about destroying Hamas (and worth noting Hamas isn't the only militant organisation in Gaza anyway) and more about destroying Palestine.

Agree. I also think, on the Kante>everyone else thing, that Mahrez's career post-Leicester has arguably been as/more impressive than Kante's. Anyway our team that year was an absolute joke. What a time to be alive

Warrants its own thread imo

Agree, it's a bit of a game theory conundrum to be honest. And of course the most selfish but best outcome (at least in the short term) for many countries would be if other countries reduce their emissions without them reducing theirs, so there is an additional free-rider problem. Added to that that governing parties terms usually last a shorter period than it would take to feel significant negative climate impacts (at least in high emitting countries), although there is at least now significant evidence around the importance and magnitude of the impacts of climate change. There are simple (I agree) solutions, but they require a level of collaboration that politics makes very difficult, particularly given the uneven distribution of benefits of fossil fuel usage and costs of climate change.

and on that note, I'm going 6 0 win.

If we win tonight can we redo the form analysis to prove how stupid extrapolating based on a tiny sample size is. Buuut buuut Leeds are surely the best team in the world.

To be fair COP1 was 28 years ago! But agree, you would have hoped this kind of wording would have been made shortly after the Paris agreement and would subsequently be strengthened. I do think it is very difficult though, particularly managing: i) less developed countries with fossil fuel resources who feel like they are once again being unfairly treated by developed countries who often already used exploitation of resources to develop. ii) trying to get developed countries to voluntarily (financially) support less developed countries to either forego fossil fuel revenues or to adapt to the impacts of climate change that (primarily) developed countries have caused. iii) rich countries with high O&G revenues who rightly see climate progress as against their current 'business model'. I think with all of these it is really difficult to see how the current approach to climate progress will get us anywhere near 2 degrees, never mind 1.5.

Agree with this and also think it pushes us to play better having a team neck and neck with us. I hope we finish top with record points but hope Ipswich push us right to the end.

Can't we get the table out where leeds are the best team in the world thoo

You lot are class, definitely should be where you are

This is such an utterly bizarre comment