Match Ratings : Bournemouth 1-1 Leicester - Results & Man of the Match

[Stuliasz]

First MotM for Schlupp as Unbeaten Run Continues

lcfcratings.wordpress.com

 

Saturday 29 August 2015, 15:00
Barclays Premier League
Vitality Stadium, Bournemouth

 

 

Bournemouth 1
Wilson 24′

 

Leicester City 1
Vardy 86′ (pen)

 

 

Total Votes : 128

 

LCFC Ratings Man of the Match : Jeff Schlupp

1. Jeff Schlupp : 7.44
2. N'Golo Kanté : 7.21
3. Jamie Vardy : 7.07
4. Wes Morgan : 6.10
5. (SUB) Shinji Okazaki : 5.95
6. Kasper Schmeichel : 5.77
7. Marc Albrighton : 5.45
8. Robert Huth : 5.37
9. Andy King : 5.10
10. Danny Drinkwater : 4.94
11. (SUB) Joe Dodoo : 4.88
12. Riyad Mahrez : 4.62
13. (SUB) Yohan Benalouane : 4.39
14. Ritchie De Laet : 3.78

Team Performance : 5.73 (5/5)

 

Manager Performance : 4.88 (5/5)

 

Opposition Performance : 5.79 (3/5)

 

Officials Performance (Ref: Neil Swarbrick) : 3.78 (5/5)

 

Overall Manager Confidence : 96.75% (-3.25%)

[Fox42]

[C-man]

I'm sorry but anyone rating Swarbrick above a 1, defined as 'shocking', cannot have been at the game.

[Rasmic123]

I'm sorry but anyone rating Swarbrick above a 1, defined as 'shocking', cannot have been at the game.

i struggled to give him a 1 tbh, horrible refereeing performance

[Spicer]

Bit harsh on Drinkwater. A bit like Kante he got better as the match went on.

[Guest]

Bit harsh on Drinkwater. A bit like Kante he got better as the match went on.

 

We didn't win so the haterz are hating.

[foxfanazer]

Glad Schlupp got the recognition he deserves. Very good performance Jeff

[Wymsey]

Was De Laet really that crap?

[LCCFox96]

Drinkwater was better than King on Saturday imo.

[The Doctor]

Was De Laet really that crap?

Torrid time until gradel went off but that score's partly because he's scapegoat of the month

[enmac]

RDL was better than either of Wham's FBs last week.

[Dan]

Was De Laet really that crap?

 

He was beyond hopeless. One of the worst individual displays I've seen from one player in a long time. Ripped apart by Gradel (who's technique is so average) time and time again and gave the ball away regularly. Slightly better second half but that first half was absolutely frightening viewing.

[enmac]

Really don't like picking on individuals. Think TEAM.

Full backs on here always get a hard time. Can't be easy. Half the the time spent marking an olympic sprinter, the other half the time playing like a winger yourself. Sounds tough to me.

[Dan]

Whilst you are right, that doesn't excuse aimlessly hoofing the ball constantly.

[inckley fox]

Really don't like picking on individuals. Think TEAM.

Full backs on here always get a hard time. Can't be easy. Half the the time spent marking an olympic sprinter, the other half the time playing like a winger yourself. Sounds tough to me.

 

We don't have a great history where it comes to full backs, not in the past 25 years. Our best full backs have often been conversions - Grayson was a utility, settled at right back and right wing back and won two player-of-the-year awards. Mills was a converted right back. Under O'Neill we played wing backs rather than out-and-out right backs, often with Impey or Savage in the role. Under Pearson we struggled with loan players, Neilson, Solano, Peltier, De Laet were all heavily questioned. In his first spell Morrison, a CB, settled into the role. In his second spell his period of greatest success was, again, with wing backs with Albrighton filling in.

 

On the left we've fared a little better with Whitlow in the early to mid 90s, and then converting to wing backs with Guppy in the role. But we've also had the likes of Rogers, Stewart to moan about. Konchesky, for many years one of our clearly weakest links, was something of a blessing.

 

But on this occasion, seeing as the man-of-the-match was our left back, I think it's hard to say we're being unduly hard on full backs!

[Guest]

Right three got the best ratings.

 

Albrighton was atrocious and got a generous mark here.

 

at people voting him the sack already with us unbeaten and near top of the prem.