Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Mark

Match Ratings: Leicester City 4-0 Newcastle - Vote Now

Leicester City 4-0 Newcastle

You do not have permission to vote. Please login to vote.
  1. 6.9

    Total Average Rating

    155 votes
  2. Highest Rated Player

    James Maddison 8.4
  3. Lowest Rated Player

    Timothy Castagne 6.0
  4. Manager Confidence 90% +38%

Recommended Posts

Posted

Season: 2021/22
Voting Starts: 12/12/21
Voting Ends: 17/12/21

  1. Kasper Schmeichel
  2. Timothy Castagne
  3. Jonny Evans
  4. Çağlar Söyüncü
  5. Luke Thomas
  6. Wilfred Ndidi
  7. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall
  8. Youri Tielemans
  9. James Maddison
  10. Patson Daka
  11. Harvey Barnes
  12. Boubakary Soumaré (sub)
  13. Marc Albrighton (sub)

Guest kristianity77
Posted

Think it's a bit harsh to say Johnny Evans is disabled, even if he is getting injured every five minutes..

Posted

The display doesn't warrant a 6.9 team average. It was a very average display with a lot of average to poor spells of play. Timmy was particularly poor, although he did almost score a goal. 

Posted

Although we played against a very poor side, I like the style of our play and setup better and hopefully the result gives us a bit more belief in playing this style (ie. mix it up a bit and not just do sideway or backward passes). 

Posted
8 hours ago, Bazly said:

The display doesn't warrant a 6.9 team average. It was a very average display with a lot of average to poor spells of play. Timmy was particularly poor, although he did almost score a goal. 

I think you’re being overly harsh there, a very average 4 - 0 win deserves a slightly better than average, average score.

Madders being involved in four goals today, Tielemans scoring twice deserve an 8 at least, and decent performances from KDH, Thomas Daka, Soyuncu and Wilf all deserving of at least 7s.

I didn’t think anyone was below a 6. It was a decent performance without being flashy where we did the basics well and never gave them a look in. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...