BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 We were awful through April. All this play-off talk <_< Do you know why Rob Kelly was only given a 12 month contract?
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 because he's not good enough? No, that remains to be seen he may well be. However, the board as a whole don't have complete confidence in him.
Guest Gist Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 There was nothing to play for in April maybe the players should still have performed but when we had prevented relegation it didn't really matter.
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 There was nothing to play for in April maybe the players should still have performed but when we had prevented relegation it didn't really matter. What kind of excuse is that?
Fleckney Fox Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 you lot are fickle - just a few months ago Rob was our hero after ONE loss your saying all this...
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 you lot are fickle - just a few months ago Rob was our hero after ONE loss your saying all this... Ah but Fleckney not everyone got taken in by what unfolded, yes we stayed up but the football was shite and nothing has changed. In fact we have got worse.
Thracian Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 There was nothing to play for in April maybe the players should still have performed but when we had prevented relegation it didn't really matter. Kelly said it did. But he could have given experience to some of the young squad members as was suggested - and been forgiven if things went a little haywire. Now that experience has to be all be gained in the serious cut and thrust. But it has to happen sooner or later so better now than sometime later when our position might be worse.
Gamesmaster Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 No, that remains to be seen he may well be. However, the board as a whole don't have complete confidence in him. then why hire him...surely it would be better to hire someone they and we have confidence in.
l444ry Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 then why hire him...surely it would be better to hire someone they and we have confidence in. But surely you knew that a camel is a horse designed by a committee!!!!
Bluefoxtim Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 We were awful through April.All this play-off talk <_< Do you know why Rob Kelly was only given a 12 month contract? It is a rolling contract which is totally different
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 It is a rolling contract which is totally different Exactly, no confidence in him what-so-ever!!!
l444ry Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 TBF, martin has one. Probably on Martin's terms though. It'll be Martin who wants to go when he is ready.
Stevosevic Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 Who was talking about play-offs? hell of alot of people on this forum.
Ricey Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 hell of alot of people on this forum. Mainly chavy kids though, most respectable posters never mentioned the play-offs.
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 BartonFox = Andy from Long Eaton!!! That's the second time you've tried to make that claim and for the second time I'll tell you your are wrong. I live in South Leicester
Suffolk_fox Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 RK did well to get us out of relegation, but the board are obviously being very astute in giving him this one season to prove himself. Afterall, many a time a club sacks a manager and the team miraculously plays better.... It will be cheaper to sack him IF he turns out to be over-rated. If he does well this season, he will be rewarded with a longer deal, I reckon. (Ye Gods! Did I just praise a Board decision???)
Knighton Matt Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 That's the second time you've tried to make that claim and for the second time I'll tell you your are wrong. I live in South Leicester If you ever fancy popping in for a jar let me know
BartonFox Posted 5 August 2006 Author Posted 5 August 2006 If you ever fancy popping in for a jar let me know Only if there is Red Stripe on tap
lookwhaticando Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 RK did well to get us out of relegation, but the board are obviously being very astute in giving him this one season to prove himself. Afterall, many a time a club sacks a manager and the team miraculously plays better.... It will be cheaper to sack him IF he turns out to be over-rated. If he does well this season, he will be rewarded with a longer deal, I reckon. (Ye Gods! Did I just praise a Board decision???) But he doesn't really need a longer contract. His rolling contract is always a year long - it's exactly a year long today, and tomorrow it'll be exactly a year long still. The only time that changes is when he is sacked or he walks. The way to extend a rolling contract is to make it an 18 month or 24 month rolling contract. The only benefit that has is for the manager - he gets 18 months or 24 months of pay if he's sacked, rather than the 12 he would get at present.
Cat Burger Posted 5 August 2006 Posted 5 August 2006 I too was not suprised by the result, in fact I missed the first 5 minutes talking to a minor aquaintance/getting a sausage roll from Greggs, THAT'S how much I knew I was missing. I sat down and HEY, it's a goal...TRIFFIC. Well I'm hoping that performance has quelled any misplaced optimism our fans may have. Lets all get our knife-sharpening implements out and, not use them, but think about it, you know what I mean? Particularly for the players, not just Kelly for bumming Twatto (sooner we shit-bin him the better)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.