SydneyFC Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 What has happened to young Weso? Last I heard of him he had knock in October and haven't heard of him since. Does he have some sort of bone disease that leaves him on the sidelines with the lightest tackle?
SydneyFC Posted 19 November 2006 Author Posted 19 November 2006 Australia can't afford to have him end his career so early.
Jimmy Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 he like williams and o'grady returned to training after injury last week after injury, yesterday was obviously too soon, they may be availible for derby next week
Joe. Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 he like williams and o'grady returned to training after injury last week after injury, yesterday was obviously too soon, they may be availible for derby next week We hope...
ithuriel Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 im not holding my breath , i just fear that just like matty piper injuries will ruin his career before it gets started.
lcfc_jme Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 Weso is still on the treatment table and was pushing for a place in yesterday's match squad, but it came too soon for him and he is preparing himself for Derby.. I'd rate him at 50/50. Hopefully he doesn't get too many more injuries, it'd be sad to see him ruined like that before he has a chance to shine.
Thracian Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 He looked chirpy enough at the Academy match. I'm never sure if Kelly's being justifiably cautious with him or whether he uses the situation as another excuse to keep his pals in the team. Even if he returns fit though Kelly will still have a problem because he wants to use Hughes and Tiatto, not to mention Stearman and that's far too negative. Truth is we have too many of the wrong players and not enough of the right ones. The squad is too big and RK doesn't seem prepared to make decisions which might make him unpopular with his senior players.
Bert Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 He looked chirpy enough at the Academy match. I'm never sure if Kelly's being justifiably cautious with him or whether he uses the situation as another excuse to keep his pals in the team. Even if he returns fit though Kelly will still have a problem because he wants to use Hughes and Tiatto, not to mention Stearman and that's far too negative. Truth is we have too many of the wrong players and not enough of the right ones. The squad is too big and RK doesn't seem prepared to make decisions which might make him unpopular with his senior players. But it's fine when your pals get selected.
Graz Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 Our squad is too big!? Yesterday we apparently only had 16 fit professional players! If our squad was smaller we wouldn't be able to field a team. Or it would be a team of 15 year olds, which you'd probably love, but would see us do worse.
SilverFox Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 He looked chirpy enough at the Academy match. I'm never sure if Kelly's being justifiably cautious with him or whether he uses the situation as another excuse to keep his pals in the team. Even if he returns fit though Kelly will still have a problem because he wants to use Hughes and Tiatto, not to mention Stearman and that's far too negative. Truth is we have too many of the wrong players and not enough of the right ones. The squad is too big and RK doesn't seem prepared to make decisions which might make him unpopular with his senior players. What is your problem?
Daggers Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 The squad is too big :laugh: C'mon Thracian...fess up; which of the FoxesTalk nominations are you hunting with this post? Most humorous or most controversial?
Thracian Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 I seem to remember even Kelly remarked on it once...it's far too big even considering our unusual spate of injuries lately. If we had to pick a team today, here's the choice, given that Weso and O'Grady are back training: Douglas, Maybury, Kisorbo, McAuley, McCarthy, Hughes, Hume, Tiatto, Fryatt, Henderson, Low, Stearman, Hammond, O'Grady, Wesolowski, Sylla, Welsh, Logan, Porter. That's 19. It's only our own fault that Dodds is unavailable which would make 20. Gradel's got a squad number and Andy King could slot in anytime. So 22 to pick from - or two complete teams if our squad were properly balanced. On top I doubt I doubt that Sheehan, Johnson or Kenton are particularly long term injuries. With no reserve side to speak of it's too many. And that is shown in the problems we're having keeping all of them fit. At least three of those players could be shed and probably four of the remaining squad would need replacing to give us any chance of success this year. Twenty/21 decent players is plenty and much easier to keep harmonious. A couple of Academy names could be listed for emergency cover such as Odhiambo and Lycett, who's there anyway.
Swedging Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 I seem to remember even Kelly remarked on it once...it's far too big even considering our unusual spate of injuries lately. If we had to pick a team today, here's the choice, given that Weso and O'Grady are back training: Douglas, Maybury, Kisorbo, McAuley, McCarthy, Hughes, Hume, Tiatto, Fryatt, Henderson, Low, Stearman, Hammond, O'Grady, Wesolowski, Sylla, Welsh, Logan, Porter. That's 19. It's only our own fault that Dodds is unavailable which would make 20. Gradel's got a squad number and Andy King could slot in anytime. So 22 to pick from - or two complete teams if our squad were properly balanced. So, 16 then. Given that Weso and O'Grady weren't fit to play, and you're not normally looking for 3 goalkeepers in your final 16...
Joe. Posted 19 November 2006 Posted 19 November 2006 I saw Weso earlier in town at the turn on of the Christmas lights in Leicester! Didn't speak to him though. just thought I would say...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.