Should McCarthy Replace McAuley?

[davieG]

I think not!

[Royston.]

Dont change a winning line up.

[Scow]

Why change a winning formula? (albeit not a convincing one)

[Royston.]

Unconvincing it may have been but what a fantastic result. 3 points at molineux!

Barnsley will probably over-defend and make it hard for our already weak attack.

I hope Kelly has prepared for that.

[Thracian]

Unconvincing it may have been but what a fantastic result. 3 points at molineux!

Barnsley will probably over-defend and make it hard for our already weak attack.

I hope Kelly has prepared for that.

Of course he has....it's the season of goodwill

[Dr The Singh]

Unconvincing it may have been but what a fantastic result. 3 points at molineux!

Barnsley will probably over-defend and make it hard for our already weak attack.

I hope Kelly has prepared for that.

I agree, so the question is, who is more of a attacking threat.........tough choice, but it would have to be McCauley due to his height etc!!

[syston_fox]

Unconvincing it may have been but what a fantastic result. 3 points at molineux!

Barnsley will probably over-defend and make it hard for our already weak attack.

I hope Kelly has prepared for that.

The defence never really looked troubled against Wolves despite all that second half pressure so stick with McAuley. And as for Barnsley playing a defensive game, McAuley's aerial pressence from free kicks and corners could prove useful!

[Bert]

No. But he will.

[Wils]

No,McAuley is a better player than Paddy,Rob will still play him though.

[Ultra]

The defence never really looked troubled against Wolves despite all that second half pressure so stick with McAuley. And as for Barnsley playing a defensive game, McAuley's aerial pressence from free kicks and corners could prove useful!

Like Paddy's wouldn't?

Who's scored more goals this season?

[Lord Nibblington]

In Short, Hell No.

Which doesn't mean that he won't be put back in the team.

What odds can I get for him getting a stupid booking in the first 10 minutes folks?

[Joe.]

No Way!

McCarthy doesn't deserve his place in th team

McAuley was simply outstanding against Wolves and should be able to keep his place

[lookwhaticando]

No Way!

McCarthy doesn't deserve his place in th team

McAuley was simply outstanding against Wolves and should be able to keep his place

I vote keep McAuley but I'm probably prejudiced.

[RowlattsFox]

mcauley should stay in without a doubt.

as for barnsley being defensive, i don't think they will, they have scored 28 goals compared to our 21. they usualy have a go at teams but their approach to games might be diferent now that ritchie is not there.

[Unabomber]

There isn't a logical reason to put Paddy back in the team, he is as consistant as McAuley and he doesn't seem as disiplined

[lookwhaticando]

It's a sad state of affairs when I Captain is only wanted back in the side by around 9% of the fans.

[Kilworthfox]

It's a sad state of affairs when I Captain is only wanted back in the side by around 9% of the fans.

I would like to see them play together all 3 central defenders but that means going against the 4-4-2 & there's no chance!

[Guest Gist]

McAuley should stay in the side, he deserves it.

[Leonisco]

No - McAuley was superb (from what I hear ) at Wolves, would not be right to just drop him.

I do like Paddy Mac, he's got great potential, but McAuley has been excellent whenever I've seen him, whereas Paddy is more erratic.

[gosfox]

Whilst McCauley is playing so well, Paddy should be made to fight for his place (not literally ) I'm sure it would do him good to realise that there is competition for the position