foxesfan1 Posted 14 March 2007 Share Posted 14 March 2007 hi everyone i go every home game and away games but i still cannot see why steven hughes is playing ahead of mark yeates yeates: 1.he has more spark and creativity 2.he is quick 3.he was played full games when he arrived and played well and scored on debut 4.at the leeds game and the west brom games hughes played awfully he missed 4 shots :!: last night at the leeds game why is he still played before yeates? however i must say when hughes arrived he did have his spark too but i cant see why kelly messes the midfield round so much lets here your views , cheers for reading (not a fight) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 14 March 2007 Share Posted 14 March 2007 Would be the worst fight ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxesfan1 Posted 14 March 2007 Author Share Posted 14 March 2007 i just cant see why hes playing ahead of yeates i thought we brought yeates in to brighten up the midfield not to put on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simi Posted 14 March 2007 Share Posted 14 March 2007 i just cant see why hes playing ahead of yeates i thought we brought yeates in to brighten up the midfield not to put on the bench You were quite cleary mistaken. So is Danny Cadamarteri, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxesfan1 Posted 14 March 2007 Author Share Posted 14 March 2007 maybe its because i like yeates but still think hes worth more than the bench my team would be: hendo maybury mccauley kisnorbo johanson yeates newton jarret porter the horse humeeeee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STUHILL Posted 14 March 2007 Share Posted 14 March 2007 Well on last nights showing, anybody is better than Hughes. Although not been overly impressed with Yeates, he comes across as someone who thinks he's better than this league! To me both aren't good enough to start games! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxesfan1 Posted 14 March 2007 Author Share Posted 14 March 2007 a fair point but i think we should try and use players we get in and keep players in who are playing well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Nothing i've seen from Yeates suggest he's anything but lightweight. It's early to judge but on Tuesday's showing Newton is a far more accomplished right winger and should be first choice with Gradel on the bench getting proper involvement and 20/30 minutes whenever possible. We should have first choice and shadow in all positions by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Now Newton has arrived your question is out of date. It will probably be a case of Newton or Yeates, in which case based on the Leeds game, reputation & experience - No contest at the moment. As RK thinks he's a left winger you're really talking about Newton / Cadamartri / Gradel on the right Porter / Yeates / Tiatto on the left As for Hughes he's now competing for a CM position with with Johnson, Jarrett, Tiatto, Weso, maybe Porter and many would say Hume. With injuries and Rk's in ability to try anything different it's a case of Hughes, Jarrett, Johnson & Tiatto. with Tiatto only capable of playing left CM. Not a lot of choice really considering Johnson is consistently worse than Hughes you're down to Hughes, Jarrett Jarrett, Tiatto Hughes, Tiatto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 I've no idea of Weso's current level of fitness but get the impression City are going to get to safety before they use Weso again and I have no quarrel with that. Ignoring Weso on that basis the choice is stark. But Andy King would definitely play and I wish Tom Tejan-Sie was a bit older, stronger and more experienced because those two would suit me fine. There is no alternative for Porter on the left wing so bringing him into his best position would create a problem elsewhere unless Kelly went 4-3-3 which he wouldn't anyway and certainly won't now Newton's arrived. So considering I don't rate Johnson or Jarrett that leaves King and Tiatto or King and Hughes for me unless Hume is put into the equation (again unlikely given he's the only one scoring regularly). I have no great preference from the two choices. Tiatto's the sort who could keep King's confidence up and show an example in terms of effort but Hughes has the better engine and is, presumably playing for a future here. In the end I'd start King/Hughes and probably draft Tiatto in after an hour or 70 minutes if it suited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Hero Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Is this not a bit like Syphilis vs Gonorrhea? Burn to death vs Freeze to death? Etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo V Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Threads like this put a sense of perspective of what little option we have. One is an injury prone central midfielder who for some reason the gaffer prefers to play on the right and Yeates is according to some Spurs fan mates of mine a decent "striker" () who can play on the wing. From the little Ive seen of him I dont think that he is any better than Josh Low! I`d much rather we didnt play either one and tried one of the kids as it is a problem position for us. Signing Shawn Newton isnt a great move despite his decent enough start. Jeez we need a squad overhaul big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phlashman Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 The answer will also be Hughes while RK is in charge as Hughes has photos of RK at a swingers party which he'll put on the internet if he gets dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Is this not a bit like Syphilis vs Gonorrhea? Burn to death vs Freeze to death? Etc? They're both fairly easy questions though sir, Gonorrhea doesn't kill you, and if you frozen to death theres a chance that scientists may be able to bring you back to life in the future. This is more of "Who you you rather be locked in a small room with, Jimmy Saville or the Crankeys" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo V Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 They're both fairly easy questions though sir, Gonorrhea doesn't kill you, and if you frozen to death theres a chance that scientists may be able to bring you back to life in the future. This is more of "Who you you rather be locked in a small room with, Jimmy Saville or the Crankeys" Or Gary Gliiter and Johnathan King. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Hero Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 This is more of "Who you you rather be locked in a small room with, Jimmy Saville or the Crankeys" Is Stephen Hughes still an option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 There is no alternative for Porter on the left wing so bringing him into his best position would create a problem elsewhere. Yeates prefers LM, and Tiatto can play there too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcfc_jme Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Stephen Hughes or Mark Yeates? Hughes will be played everytime. But that's not to say I'd like to see it. If I had the choice, I'd play Yeates in CM with a fit Tiatto/Weso, so he can push forward and use his "spark" and "creativity" for the magical purposes they're for whilst Tiatto/Weso does the donkey work in the middle and disrupts all the attacks. I'm not Kelly though, so this will not be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asha Posted 15 March 2007 Share Posted 15 March 2007 Stephen Hughes was absolutely diabolical against Leeds. Hardly got a pass right and after being here two years now he still hasnt made a positive impact - really. His shooting was awful again against Leeds and three times it sat up nicely for him outside the box and mucked it up each time - where my female friends would have all hit the target - absolutely useless. Yeates i havent seen much of only at the home games and he looks distinctly average...i would hope that when the season starts in August neither of them are listen in the squad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.