blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 the LCFC history; P.......W.....D......L 4234 1571 1100 1558 not much to discuss more just a stat.
Manwell Pablo Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 the LCFC history;P.......W.....D......L 4234 1571 1100 1558 not much to discuss more just a stat. **** me that is interesting.
Leicester Lass Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 I find it interesting that the figures don't even add up
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 **** me that is interesting. sums up this season really.
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 I find it interesting that the figures don't even add up agreed that makes 4229 matches, blame wikipedia not me! it gives a ball part figure i suppose.
lookwhaticando Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 agreed that makes 4229 matches, blame wikipedia not me! it gives a ball part figure i suppose. They didn't account for incomplete/abandoned matches.
Guest Gist Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 I'm surprised to see we've won more overall compared to what we've lost.
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 They didn't account for incomplete/abandoned matches. impressive!!! i like the thinking outside the box
MC Prussian Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 the LCFC history;P.......W.....D......L 4234 1571 1100 1558 not much to discuss more just a stat. **** you are you a twat. Besides, anyone can visit wikipedia on their own.
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 **** you are you a twat.Besides, anyone can visit wikipedia on their own. say what????
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 **** you are you a twat.Besides, anyone can visit wikipedia on their own. clap fecking clap, like i give a flying feck
The Stig Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 **** you are you a twat.Besides, anyone can visit wikipedia on their own. bit harsh, not his fault he was given wrong info
Brainy Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 bit harsh, not his fault he was given wrong info they don't like each other because of this And as for Wikipedia, people can change information on it. Just ask the member who posted something about Man Utd where somebody added ''.. and wayne rooney is gay''
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 bit harsh, not his fault he was given wrong info dont worry, i think he got out of the wrong side of bed today.
MC Prussian Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 dont worry, i think he got out of the wrong side of bed today. I thought you were still asleep? Or are you a somnambulist?
Asha Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 the LCFC history;P.......W.....D......L 4234 1571 1100 1558 not much to discuss more just a stat. I would have thought being leicester it would have been a lot more draws Is this just on league games though because we've had cup successes in the past Also wouldnt like to see the goals conceded
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 I thought you were still asleep? Or are you a somnambulist? again assuming things, its bad because 4 u because when you assume you make an ass-u-me! Chris, i aint mad with anyone, its not in my nature.
MC Prussian Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 again assuming things, its bad because 4 u because when you assume you make an ass-u-me! Chris, i aint mad with anyone, its not in my nature. If only I could get to understand your play on words... Ooh... I know your type.
lookwhaticando Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 I thought you were still asleep? Or are you a somnambulist? * Grabs dictionary * That's quite clever!
blue blood Posted 11 April 2007 Author Posted 11 April 2007 I thought you were still asleep? Or are you a somnambulist? actually now you mention it, i used to be, well in a very diluted and part time form. Very interesting it was too.
MC Prussian Posted 11 April 2007 Posted 11 April 2007 actually now you mention it, i used to be, well in a very diluted and part time form. Very interesting it was too. Is that also why it took you so long to look it up in the dictionary?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.