MC Prussian Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Almost Word Of The Year for Leicester City Football Club. We always "almost" score.
Bryn Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 GOWAN JOE MATTOCK, 4 fooking men, when was the last time one of our players beat 4 men?! Why didn't we play the young lads earlier?
samingram_uk Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 GOWAN JOE MATTOCK, 4 fooking men, when was the last time one of our players beat 4 men?!Why didn't we play the young lads earlier? still in nappies
Wycombe Fox Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 How long has it been since a City player went past three players on the wing? Name him! What's the betting that it was either Glover or Weller?
Brainy Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, praising the 16 year old for some good skill Would you praise Hughes for that?
Wycombe Fox Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 GOWAN JOE MATTOCK, 4 fooking men, when was the last time one of our players beat 4 men?! Bugger - beat me to it! Was it four? Bloody hell!!
Stuliasz Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 We're winning on goal attempts 10:5, problem is we're losing 1:4 on shots on target.
Foxes 2 da grave Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Porter, sure iv sin him run by players on the wing at least 3 or more
hebangsthedrums Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, praising the 16 year old for some good skillWould you praise Hughes for that? I don't know he never gives me that dilemma
Bryn Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, praising the 16 year old for some good skillWould you praise Hughes for that? Would I praise Hughes if he beasted past 4 men? Yes I f'cking would, you cynical tw't.
Foxhateram Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Porter, sure iv sin him run by players on the wing at least 3 or more to the guy who sed would i praise hughes for that, the answer yes if he ever did it! but wat is odds he will!? he doesnt have the pace! or the ability. anyway yer this is much better even a goal will do comon just sommit to cheer about!
Flynny Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, praising the 16 year old for some good skillWould you praise Hughes for that? Insert something into your rectum, possibly your own penis. Cheers chap.
Wycombe Fox Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, praising the 16 year old for some good skillWould you praise Hughes for that? Yes I would but come on...Hughes? Beat four men? :laugh: He'd struggle to beat four eggs!
MC Prussian Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Judging from your comments, this must be a cracking game.
Foxhateram Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Yes I would but come on...Hughes? Beat four men? :laugh: He'd struggle to beat four eggs! Hello a shot on target!? wow!!! its looking better already!
samingram_uk Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Judging from your comments, this must be a cracking game. oh you've missed a corker
Brainy Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Oh look, it's Burnham - yet again calling me a twat. But not just a twat, a cynical twat.
Dames Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 You know how dire it is when we have Horsefield coming on.
MC Prussian Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 oh you've missed a corker I already have regrets.
Foxhateram Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Hello a shot on target!? wow!!! its looking better already! horsefield on for maybes? is he chucking everything into this? oh no mattock has gone back to LB. mmmmmm
Lineker's Left Foot Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 FOR fook SAKES YOU BUNCH OF WANKERS WHAT ARE YOU PLAYING AT SHOW SOME fooking FIGHT FOR THE TEAM DONT YOU fooking CARE ABOUT THE POSITION WE ARE IN OR THE CLUB OR ALL OF THE FANS AT THE START OF THE GAME THAT WERE TRYING TO SPUR YOU ON AT THE START OF THE GAME WE HAVENT EVEN HAD A SHOT ON TARGET FOR fook SAKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU fooking ****S!!!!! Glad I'm not at the game. Think I could personally do better
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.