Cobbo Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Appeal rejected !! Where did you hear this? That's a bollocks decision.
He's not bald Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Appeal rejected !! Well it's better than missing the next 3 goals! Where did you hear this?That's a bollocks decision. Yeah where's the link?
Wezleylowski Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Fryatt won the appeal according to this Bottom part of the Leicester section.
Wherethefoxhat? Posted 27 November 2007 Author Posted 27 November 2007 Where did you hear this?That's a bollocks decision. LCFC Newspage.
He's not bald Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Fryatt won the appeal according to thisBottom part of the Leicester section. No mention...total bollox...slow afternoon ay guys?
SamL Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Matty Fryatt will begin a three-match suspension this weekend after the Club failed in their bid to have his red card against Bristol City overturned. The ban means that Fryatt has now been ruled out of upcoming fixtures against Southampton, Burnley and West Bromwich Albion. http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Lates...1177380,00.html
Joe. Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Disappointing really. Not a huge fan of his but his performance at Bristol encouraged me a lot.
Wezleylowski Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 No mention...total bollox...slow afternoon ay guys? Wiki said he was sent off against Bristol for violent conduct and won his appeal against it and played 2 days later against Cardiff. It must have been changed
Staf Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Good job we have got Ashley Chambers and when is Collins John back
He's not bald Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Wiki said he was sent off against Bristol for violent conduct and won his appeal against it and played 2 days later against Cardiff. It must have been changed No...the reason he played last night was because of the appeal....I had no doubt he would lose the appeal and I suspect the club did as well, but it brought more time to get the crocked strikers fit before he went missing!
maddog Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 YES!!!!!!! This is fantastic news. He's a shit player really although he does score the odd good goal. He never wins headers and is a lazy barstard. He is the most frustrating player to watch in our team as he just doesn't get to the ball in time or make a simple pass to set up a goal for us. Trys to do too much all the time. I just think we would be better off without him. Get Sappleton in! He's scored a lot more goals than Chambers in the reserves so how was Chambers ahead of him yeterday? Unless Sappleton was injured
Ric Flair Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 YES!!!!!!! This is fantastic news. He's a shit player really although he does score the odd good goal. He never wins headers and is a lazy barstard. He is the most frustrating player to watch in our team as he just doesn't get to the ball in time or make a simple pass to set up a goal for us. Trys to do too much all the time. I just think we would be better off without him. Get Sappleton in! He's scored a lot more goals than Chambers in the reserves so how was Chambers ahead of him yeterday? Unless Sappleton was injured That my friend is why people think you're a goober.
potter3 Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 YES!!!!!!! This is fantastic news. He's a shit player really although he does score the odd good goal. He never wins headers and is a lazy barstard. He is the most frustrating player to watch in our team as he just doesn't get to the ball in time or make a simple pass to set up a goal for us. Trys to do too much all the time. I just think we would be better off without him. Get Sappleton in! He's scored a lot more goals than Chambers in the reserves so how was Chambers ahead of him yeterday? Unless Sappleton was injured You're a moron.
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 You're a moron. The definition of a "moron" is an adult with a mental age of around 12, If I was 12 ("IF? You are" haha very funny Ultra hahah, cock), I'd be pretty insulted by that Potter.
General Smuts Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 You're a moron. Yeah but he's right about Sappleton. It's all about The Sappletiser.
Joe. Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Looks like Chambers (or Sappleton ) has got his chance. Quite pleased about that too, Chambers looked quite impressive last night. Let's hope he can take his chance.
mancunianfox Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 Don't think John or Campbell are out for long. Can't see Chambers or Sappleton getting a look in yet.
gosfox Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 YES!!!!!!! This is fantastic news. He's a shit player really although he does score the odd good goal. He never wins headers and is a lazy barstard. He is the most frustrating player to watch in our team as he just doesn't get to the ball in time or make a simple pass to set up a goal for us. Trys to do too much all the time. I just think we would be better off without him. Get Sappleton in! He's scored a lot more goals than Chambers in the reserves so how was Chambers ahead of him yeterday? Unless Sappleton was injured nice to see the lads getting the support of all our committed fans
Ultra Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 The definition of a "moron" is an adult with a mental age of around 12, If I was 12 ("IF? You are" haha very funny Ultra hahah, cock), I'd be pretty insulted by that Potter. 12? Yu flatter yourself (again..) Given by what you've written in the last few days (which have evidently excited your little band of acolytes ), I'd say you're yet to clear infants school..
Ric Flair Posted 27 November 2007 Posted 27 November 2007 I was surprised Sappleton didn't get a chance last night, but obviously the coaching staff must feel Chambers was more appropriate. If none of the strikers are fit for Saturday who are currently injured, i'm sure both Chambers and Sappleton will be involved. I'm concerned that Hume & Chambers together up front will be painful if we continue to launch the ball up from the back. But if we look to pass the ball from defence to midfield and then on to the attack then it could be dangerous. Sappleton will have his uses if we require a big man for McAuley and Kisnorbo to launch the ball at.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.