Nod.E Posted 22 March 2008 Posted 22 March 2008 At the end of the day, we are shit. We're actually shit. Henderson - 7/8 Stearman - 6/7 Hayles - 6 They're Only players who deserve a rating, they seemed to want it, whereas the other players couldn't give a toss other than for their wages. Fryatt - slow Clapham - bottles 50-50's Hendrie - wasteful Howard - Lazy If we carry on with performances like today, we are down, and deservedly so. Sort this shit out, Ollie.
Uncle Monty Posted 22 March 2008 Posted 22 March 2008 Am i right in thinkin n'gotty was played in midfield?????????
C-man Posted 22 March 2008 Posted 22 March 2008 Am i right in thinkin n'gotty was played in midfield????????? He tried to be Claude Makalele and failed miserably.
Simon Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Better than okay! I was flabbergasted. Fair dos. That run down the left was pretty awesome in the first half. He certainly should have stayed there. I was in shock after yesterday. The only players deserving of wages are Hendo, Hayles and Hendrie after yesterday. Okay so Hendrie made some wasteful passes but at least he was TRYING to make them come off. He is probably the man that could create the goals that might keep us up. The people on here getting on his back for trying to create things is not going to help our cause.
Micky Ruddle Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Hendo 6 Clapham 4 Stearman 3 Kisnorbo - 4 McAuley - 4 Oakley 5 Hendrie 4 Bruno 5 Hayles 6 Fryatt 2 - hardly recognisable Howard 4 Etuhu 2 Campbell - n/a Mattock n/a
gosfox Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 The peno 'foul' was right in front of me and I don't think Hendo touched him. Lino looked very unsure giving it. I thought that too.... It was a hell of an acrobatic perfomance, but i suppose we would have done the same in the same situation Henderson - 7 The rest - Thanks for bothering to turn up
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Henderson - 6.5 Stearman - 4.5 Kisnorbo - 4 McAuley - 4 Clapham - 5 Hendrie - 5.5 Oakley - 4 N'Gotty - 5 Hayles - 6 (what a God this guy is) Matty Fryatt - 3.5 Howard - 4 Subs: Mattock - 3.5 Campbell - 3 (if he'd have performed at that level for the entire game) Kelvin - 3.5 (see Campbell) As an aside, match rating of +15 goes to the fans at the back of F1, including the legend that is Nev, for standing together and defeating the stewards in their quest to remove Andy from the ground. Quite brilliant stuff. Kevin Barkley is an absolute willy puller of the highest order, and I can imagine he was crying into his White Ace when he got home because his order was not carried out.
Daggers Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Kevin Barkley is an absolute willy puller of the highest order, and I can imagine he was crying into his White Ace when he got home because his order was not carried out. Is he the bald bloke in the flouro jacket down near us?
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Is he the bald bloke in the flouro jacket down near us? :laugh: oh God no! Kevin Barkley is the cretin that sits in the office with a smug grin, drinking cold-coffee and giving orders to his minions as and when he sees fit, so he escapes all blame and abuse for his actions. The bald bloke in the jacket down near your lot is one of Barkley's "chosen men", so to speak. He's the one who man-handled Andy yesterday and got a shed-load of abuse. He is also a willy puller. I'm guessing you're going to tell me he's actually a nice guy?!
lildave3 Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 He tried to be Claude Makalele and failed miserably. I personally thought he was quite good.
Daggers Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 I'm guessing you're going to tell me he's actually a nice guy?! Nah! I was told something about someone and their past associations and was just trying to link it to a face. BTW - get your Mum to explain to you the benefits of wrapping up warm when it's all parky outside.
Joe. Posted 23 March 2008 Author Posted 23 March 2008 I personally thought he was quite good. I didn't see him being worse than the others either unlike most on here.
Simi Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Nah! I was told something about someone and their past associations and was just trying to link it to a face.
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Nah! I was told something about someone and their past associations and was just trying to link it to a face. BTW - get your Mum to explain to you the benefits of wrapping up warm when it's all parky outside. Nah you'd know Barkley straight away if you saw him. "Sucking-a-lemon" type face, beachball sized head and an elephant sized jacket a different colour to everyone else complete with knuckle-dragging demeanour. Ahh I'll also get her to tell me what to do when people start threatening to remove items of clothing and run around a field full of men whilst I'm at it.
Fox in a Box Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 All the team and management get a big fat ZERO - 0 Whilst henderson is in goal we will lose everygame, he made a few decent saves today but to be honest I'd prefer no keeper at all to him. Hume was MOTM, for not turning up. Holloway -1 for 30,000 fans being up for the match and he gets a -1 for not even thinking a draw might be a decent return today. Failed Failed Failed Keep the faith, more like keep your sanity
Simi Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Hume was MOTM, for not turning up. Then surely he's been our MOTM for the last 3/4 games.
Fox in a Box Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Then surely he's been our MOTM for the last 3/4 games. correct hollway plays him out of position and anyone is a fool for not noticing it. he AINT the same person on the wing.
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Then surely he's been our MOTM for the last 3/4 games. Controversial. A wise man told me that Hume looks good not because of his pace, but because he's always moving and making passes available for us. Something which was horrifically lacking yesterday. Stop the Hume bashing. Iain, Iain Huuuuume, Iain, Iain Hume!!
Fox in a Box Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Controversial. A wise man told me that Hume looks good not because of his pace, but because he's always moving and making passes available for us. Something which was horrifically lacking yesterday. Stop the Hume bashing. Iain, Iain Huuuuume, Iain, Iain Hume!! were backing hume, but not on the wing, you fool.
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 were backing hume, but not on the wing, you fool. I'm guessing all strikers have to be Steve Howard-static and aren't allowed to move, then?? TAAAAAAAAAAAAAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FOR SALT
Fox in a Box Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 I'm guessing all strikers have to be Steve Howard-static and aren't allowed to move, then?? TAAAAAAAAAAAAAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FOR SALT are you thick?
lcfc_jme Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 are you thick? I'm a Leicester fan. Draw your own conclusions. Are you "special"?
C-man Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 I didn't see him being worse than the others either unlike most on here. N'Gotty was too slow on the ball and misplaced quite a few passes. So you're right, he wasn't worse than the others
Daggers Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 Ahh I'll also get her to tell me what to do when people start threatening to remove items of clothing and run around a field full of men whilst I'm at it. I receive money from the government to act as an example to young people about the dangers of drink.
Flynny Posted 23 March 2008 Posted 23 March 2008 N'Gotty was too slow on the ball and misplaced quite a few passes. So you're right, he wasn't worse than the others That's true, but just having a man in that position was a big help to us. Aerially he was excellent and a good deal of his wayward passing (nowhere near all before anyone jumps on me! That attempted pass to Clapham that got intercepted was diabolical!) was down to no-one giving him options. I kinda agree with Jamie, too. That could have been just the kind of scrappy game for Hume to prove his worth in, even in midfield. He should have been playing where Fryatt was. I'm a fan of Fryatt to an extent, but not up front or on a flank. If we're going to use him it's got to be through the middle behind the strikers/a striker or not at all.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.